I was thinking today about a punk artist who I've shared a bill with a few times. He's a solo guitarist who usually was put on as filler between other acts. I shared a bill with him twice:
First Time - 15 minutes into his set he broke a string and had no backup guitar or spare string. He had to end his set.
Second Time - He had to start late because he was waiting for another band to show up so that he could borrow a guitar because he left his someplace else and apparently didn't factor that into the fact that he had to play that night.
When I questioned someone about this they just said "It's punk credibility man..."
Could someone explain this to me? How is lack of preparedness on par with credibility?
First Time - 15 minutes into his set he broke a string and had no backup guitar or spare string. He had to end his set.
Second Time - He had to start late because he was waiting for another band to show up so that he could borrow a guitar because he left his someplace else and apparently didn't factor that into the fact that he had to play that night.
When I questioned someone about this they just said "It's punk credibility man..."
Could someone explain this to me? How is lack of preparedness on par with credibility?
I always find that pretty funny, because I always think about how nice Rancid's gear has always been; and Rancid is probably 100x more credible than that guitarist can ever hope to be.