they are, and feel great in hand. I had 2 of the gold ones, both had a twist in the neck though....
And they say Gibson has bad quality control...
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
they are, and feel great in hand. I had 2 of the gold ones, both had a twist in the neck though....
Great video/tip! One of those things that makes you think you should’ve thought of it 15 years ago![]()
Yeah. I remember struggling with a friend’s oddball bass back in the 70s. Some weird import. I think it was Russian. And it neck dived harder and faster than Dracula.
One of my band’s guitarists was buddies with people in Aerosmith. I was moaning about the bass and one of their roadies said “Hey man! Don’t you know about the belt trick?”
It was a life altering lesson.
I was surprised when I stumbled across the YT video. There it was. The Belt Trick.![]()
A friend played in Santana in the late 70's-early 80's using an Embassy Deluxe (headstock just as big as a t-bird and using the same tuning machines - and smaller and lighter body than a t-bird) and he did the other old trick of hanging a bag with weights off the rear strap button. I've got both a 60's Embassy and t-bird and the wide leather strap works just fine with no added weight!
IIRC the Flying V guitar was designed to be played like a classical guitar; the opening of the V is to be leant on the right thigh (left thigh for a left-handed player). This way the neck is further away from your body, making higher frets more accessible.Playing it sitting down.
Over time I had 3 EB-3's: Gibson short scale and Epi Long scale. The Epi dove like a Stuka, my THUNDERBIRD has never dived at all. Nor has my Les Paul 5er.I'm sure there are exceptions, but I have never picked up an SG style or T-bird that didn't dive like a submarine, and I mean literally never. Where are all these balanced Gibsons? Are there certain models or years where they are more likely to balance? I can picture a long scale SG balancing, but that huge headstock on a T-Bird would have to be offset by a heavier than standard body.
Where are all these balanced Gibsons?
Are there certain models or years where they are more likely to balance?
IIRC the Flying V guitar was designed to be played like a classical guitar; the opening of the V is to be leant on the right thigh (left thigh for a left-handed player). This way the neck is further away from your body, making higher frets more accessible.
On a bass, it will probably make the lower frets out of reach. No wonder they made the first batch short-scale.![]()
Well, my SG balances now with the Ultralites. As my issues with it stock went beyond just the neckdive though, I can’t say that all the upgrades involved weren’t expensive. They definitely added up, so I’m really glad I bought the bass used.The belt trick works, I've done it myself, but the other part of the equation is how a bass balances for seated play, which, if you are like most people, is how you will spend most of your time playing the bass, seated without a strap. Nothing drives me crazier than fighting a diving bass while I'm practicing, it's literally the first thing I check on any new bass I try, and an immediate disqualifier unless it seems like it could be fixed with ultralites. There are plenty of well balanced basses out there that sound great and were designed with basic ergonomics in mind, no need to put up with basses that were designed with aesthetics only, features that don't work, or that require expensive upgrades. That's my primary beef with Gibson, they have been around long enough to know better, and yet continue to use some pretty questionable design elements. If I could find an SG style bass that actually balances right off the shelf, I'd probably buy it, or build my own. I always was a sucker for that reddish mahogany finish.
The belt trick works, I've done it myself, but the other part of the equation is how a bass balances for seated play, which, if you are like most people, is how you will spend most of your time playing the bass, seated without a strap.
I always was a sucker for that reddish mahogany finish.

I just started last year playing semi-seated on a stool. My knees seem to be older than the rest of me. Before that, I always stood-since 1967.The belt trick works, I've done it myself, but the other part of the equation is how a bass balances for seated play, which, if you are like most people, is how you will spend most of your time playing the bass, seated without a strap. Nothing drives me crazier than fighting a diving bass while I'm practicing, it's literally the first thing I check on any new bass I try, and an immediate disqualifier unless it seems like it could be fixed with ultralites. There are plenty of well balanced basses out there that sound great and were designed with basic ergonomics in mind, no need to put up with basses that were designed with aesthetics only, features that don't work, or that require expensive upgrades. That's my primary beef with Gibson, they have been around long enough to know better, and yet continue to use some pretty questionable design elements. If I could find an SG style bass that actually balances right off the shelf, I'd probably buy it, or build my own. I always was a sucker for that reddish mahogany finish.
Dark.Playing seating, even a long-scale slothead is perfectly fine *for me*. I could think of a couple of other basses that I had issues with playing that way, mostly ThunderBird (never bought one for that reason) and Thumb (gave up after my second one).
Light or dark ?
View attachment 3897558
Dark, Absolutely!Playing seated, even a long-scale slothead is perfectly fine *for me*. I could think of a couple of other basses that I had issues with playing that way, mostly ThunderBird (never bought one for that reason) and Thumb (gave up after my second one).
Light or dark ?
View attachment 3897558
Dark.
Dark, Absolutely!
changed the pickups for some sweet aftermarket PAF-style ones, and shielded the cavities and re-did all the electronics.
Peter Florence Voodoo ‘59s. Bought ‘em almost 20 years ago now though, and unfortunately, Mr. Florence is no longer with us. Tonally, they’re definitely on the clear and sweet side of the PAF range. Sometimes I wish they were a bit more aggressive, but I’d have to get another guitar for that as these are never coming out.No love for my "reverse-tanned" - a phrase coined by our friend @dmt in another thread - '63? Nevermind, that one's going to my bass-playing-son anyway. The dark one gets buried with me.
Thread derail warning: which pickups did you put in the Les Paul ?

Peter Florence Voodoo ‘59s. Bought ‘em almost 20 years ago now though, and unfortunately, Mr. Florence is no longer with us. Tonally, they’re definitely on the clear and sweet side of the PAF range.
Come to think of it, I’m not sure what the heck humbuckers were doing in a Tele in the first place, but that’s a different topic entirely!![]()
Who’s that? I don’t recognize himNever heard those in action anywhere. Would love to, given how you describe them.
I can think of at least one amazing guitar player who had a Gibson humbucker in his Tele, may he RIP...
View attachment 3897652