• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

fEARful part 13: the bad luck's done, son

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsorship/endorsements come in a lot of different flavors. For all but the top name players, an endorsement is typically just a free rig, or a 'wholesale price' on a given piece of gear. I would say this represents 95%+ of all endorsements.

I am lucky enough to have two pretty good friends who have major endorsements (i.e., one is a top tier 'fusion artist', and the other is a longtime bassist for a stadium level pop/rock act). Neither are payed for endorsing a product, and one of the key decision criterion used by both of them is the ability for the gear to be available around the world in many different cities, etc., so that when they show up and play, for example, a side gig at a club in Detroit, the company can easily provide a backline for them, or if a piece of gear fails, they will be sure to have a new rig by the next day.

This is part of the reason why you see so few 'boutique' sort of rigs on stage with this level of player. Players of that level can work with many different amps/cabs to get their sound. It is mostly about the 'company service' and 'distribution network' that allows a company to easily provide backline across a wide geographic area.

FYI and IME!

seems reasonable for live sound reasons. any insight on studio work?
 
seems reasonable for live sound reasons. any insight on studio work?

Most studio's of that level would have their own deal... massive high end preamps, old tube amps that they are totally comfortable mic'ing, etc. I don't think many top notch players would bring their rigs to a studio gig.

Of course, there are the hard rockers, etc. that do all sort of crazy stuff with overdriver, etc., so I'm sure it happens.
 
I suppose that would beg the question: are there any such studios using these cabs?

Well, if its a cab that presents something that is representative of a DI send, then I can't see that you're gaining anything by micing it? I mean, you're just adding complexity and potential bleed to your recordings. The cabs stay clean and clear by their nature, if you want amp tone, then post EQ DI or DI from the speaker send and it amounts to the same thing.
 
I'm not looking to argue the pros and cons, or theory. Just wondering if anyone has seen a major label band on stage or in the studio with a fEARful.

edit, regarding pro/con issues - not all DI is a replication of the sound of a mic'd cab, and often not even close. and some people want the sound and feel of the air, the mic, the room reverb, or the live sound of a full band. too many variables to include in this with no real winning answer, other than it is art and the end product should satisfy the artist as a representation of his/her vision.
 
I'd say most well funded studios and sound reinforcement companies are not building their own cabs out in the warehouse.

Many high profile acts travel light. The stage/production company in each city gets the tech rider and provides the specified amps, keys, drums, mikes and monitors, and any other stage equipment or isolation gear. You wouldn't do yourself any favors asking for hard to find stuff.

Remember, this is mostly a community of DIY'ers building a great design generously shared.

I could probably source a cab that would do a very similar job of what my fEarful does, but I think it's safe to say the price would put most people off. It's not like there's a shortage of high end, full range sound gear.

What I can't do is download the design of that high end gear, with a construction plan and details, and the specs for the drivers and crossovers. Then go out in the garage, crank up some tunes and the table saw, and build it for not too much dough. With off the shelf, easy to source components.

I've taken mine over to a club and back lined the blues jam, but no major label players showed up. There were some small label guys. Close but no cigar.

For recording, I'd lean towards a di and an isolated track with no rattling gear or noises creeping in. Straight into a good preamp and on to the board.
 
last time, and i'll let go of the bone, with no hurt feelings or ill will. i don't care where, how, or why, or what would get the best results. just asking if anyone has ever seen it done. "yes" or "no," has any big name artist ever been seen packing a fearful on stage or studio, for any reason, at any time ever?

(i'm already assuming "no" based on the replies above, so feel free not to reply unless you have a "yes")


...on to other topics.
 
Yes. Let me check my to-do list:
1-Finish my recovery from neck-down paralysis.
2-Obtain a fEARful.
3-Sign major record contract and tour the world.

Seems like a short enough list that I should be able to fit it all in by the end of 2012 ;)

Well, let us know when you're rockin' a fEARful on tour or in the studio then. About Dec. 2012 you say? Cool.

Seriously best of luck with your recovery. I'm only paralyzed from the neck up. ;)
 
last time, and i'll let go of the bone, with no hurt feelings or ill will. i don't care where, how, or why, or what would get the best results. just asking if anyone has ever seen it done. "yes" or "no," has any big name artist ever been seen packing a fearful on stage or studio, for any reason, at any time ever?

(i'm already assuming "no" based on the replies above, so feel free not to reply unless you have a "yes")


...on to other topics.

No, never!!!

1-Finish my recovery from neck-down paralysis.

Wow, that is a bummer - I hope you recover soon. BTW, how do you type - do you have use of your hands or are you using a pencil in your mouth or voice command software or something else? Just curious.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.