I like the look of the Fender logo. When I build a Warmoth, it will be my dream bass that Fender never built. I'll have a Fender logo there because, well, honestly it fits the headstock. I don't find it "cheesy" at all, and would not be embarrassed whatsoever to tell everyone that is not in fact a Fender.
My situation exactly. A few years ago when Warmoth offered the Antigua finish, a light went off in my head. It took me a few years to get it all together, but my dream build is almost complete, and it's gone through a bunch of changes, but currently it involves:
Warmoth mahogany Jazz body and pickguard in Antigua
Allparts pearloid blocked maple neck
real 1978 Jazz pickups
Hipshot vintage bridge
Real Mexi Fender tuners
Real "F" neck plate
What would Fender charge me to build it for me... five grand?
Since the body and neck are Fender licensed parts, I have no problem at all in having a Fender Jazz 70's logo on the headstock. It basically completes the project. Why should there be any objection at all?
Surely Fender must know people are going to be putting repro Fender logos on the licensed parts.
I consider my bass to be more Fender than some Chinese-outsourced maker having the official Fender logo on theirs, even if it's for Fender.
Man, I can't believe how defensive some of you guys get on this topic.
Obviously if someone is slapping a Fender logo on a non-licensed product, that's a different issue altogether.
Had Fender offered a replacement body in mahogany and Antigua, as well as a replacement neck in pearloid/maple, and these parts were priced competitively, I would have considered that. But they don't. And the fact that they don't offer what I wanted... sorry, I can't make any apologies. But I did go with licensed parts.
The Warmoth logo is stamped on the body, and the Allparts logo is stamped on the neck heel. I'm not conning anybody. It's my project, and I'm perfectly happy with it.
Did I mention... it's MY project?