Turock said:
I don't know what world you live in, but you have been proclaiming you were right all along. You even supplied documentation in an attempt to prove you were right, but if you read it and understood it, it actually proved that you were wrong.
I'd be more inclined to explain, except for when I suggested that you check your facts, you replied that you couldn't be bothered.
I'm not "hung up" on your poorly written comment. Here's the deal, you are spreading misinformation (and insisting that it is correct) on a site where people come for accurate information. Do you get that?
Read Fresh Eddie's post (that you quoted) and try to let that sink in.
Okay, I'm out.
Yeah, I just went back and read the comment I wrote and your right, I was definitely wrong and wrote it completely wrong.
I didn't just poorly write it, I completely fudged the information up all together.
I wish I had gone back to read what I wrote from the start, but was convinced that I wrote it differently and stubbornly decided I had nothing prove, I'll admit that.
So, my apologies, you were definitely 100% correct, well you didn't really share an opposing view, or add any useful information, so you were right about me not being right, if that makes sense.
However,
I'm sorry but get real with this nonsense about information, and your acting as if your objective was in any way to make sure other people were not misinformed, when they read it. Your goal was to prove me wrong.
Nothing more nothing less.
If we're gonna be real here, be real.
And yes that's what you've been hung up on since last night almost incessantly.
You've provided nothing useful in regards to information since your mission to prove me wrong started.
And I'm sorry, but if making sure people coming here for information got only 100% factual information, one would be inclined to think you'd offer some, even a little.
My very first response to you right from the start was NOT that I couldn't be bothered.
It was that I wasn't going to go on some wild goose chase because you pop up and make a claim with absolutely NOTHING informative to back it up.
I then asked you if you had information to show
I was wrong & to please feel free and share it.
You chose not to.
This would have been where you could have easily avoided any further carrying on between us by just explaining yourself, and providing some facts for those readers you claim to be so concerned about. But you didn't, you continued to just worry about making sure I knew I was wrong, but I don't buy your intent was for anyone's satisfaction but your own.
So again, my apologies to you for arguing I was definitely wrong, no doubt about it. And my apologies to the community for providing incorrect information.
This all in regards to how & why Fender purchased Squier.
This doesn't change the point from that original comment that Fender is Squier & Squier is Fender.