I am thinking that a lot of people viewing this thread don't really care about your bickering about hair and vocal attributes. I, for one, wish you could take your differences to PM and allow us to get back to Mustang discussions. Just a thought.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I am thinking that a lot of people viewing this thread don't really care about your bickering about hair and vocal attributes. I, for one, wish you could take your differences to PM and allow us to get back to Mustang discussions. Just a thought.
I agree and I've tried my best.
Great, so can we just move on?
Exactly take that talk to the pmI am thinking that a lot of people viewing this thread don't really care about your bickering about hair and vocal attributes. I, for one, wish you could take your differences to PM and allow us to get back to Mustang discussions. Just a thought.

Sure. What prompted you personally to consider a Mustang over other options?
Sure. What prompted you personally to consider a Mustang over other options?
Sure. What prompted you personally to consider a Mustang over other options?

~
Indeed I did !
Cannot say that I've ever had that experience with a song, though there have been some which WE in the band wished would stop getting requested.
Buck Owens once recorded a song about not playing a certain song.
It was called 'Please Don't Play A-Eleven'.
[A11] was the jukebox code for the song in question.
~
~UPDATED: Invalid Link Removed Buck actually recorded it [A-11] before Johnny Paycheck by a little over a year, but JP launched his solo career singing/playing it.
~
Yes, that's what my followup research also led me to believe.
So I wonder how many venues with jukeboxes showed the sense of humour to put that record into the A-11 slot of their box ?
~
~....What prompted you personally to consider a Mustang over other options?
And the Duncans are out, I took my Mustang to rehearsal and with the Duncans I just felt like sonically something was missing, the stock pickups in the Mustang have a really nice airy brightness to them and just the right amount of scoop with both pickups on and the Duncans were missing thatThey are good pickups, I like them a lot, they are ballsy and they have a lot of rasp to them which seems to be a characteristic of Duncan pickups (I have SPB-2 in another bass and they are a lot less bright but they have that rasp to them as well albeit in the midrange frequencies)
Buy used if you are unsure, that way if you don't get on with it you can sell and not lose money~
As my other posts have indicated, I'm still at the 'considering' phase, and have not yet bought a Mustang.
Like some of you, what first got me interested in short scale basses in general, 3 or 4 years ago, was the need and desire for a lighter weight bass, and it turns out that a lot of shorter scale basses tick that box.
During that period, I was diagnosed with a deterioration of the discs and whatnot of the lumbar region of my back [rather than the bones themselves, and it shows in the X-rays], not to the point of surgery so far, but I wish to avoid/postpone that for as long as possible.
So an attitude of prevention, with lighter weight gear all around, not just the bass, and a general newfound care as to how much I lift at a time, how far I should try to carry it, and moving more slowly and deliberately whenever I do lift anything at all, with less twisting and stretching even when not lifting stuff.
That all said, also deciding to sit down while playing has reduced my actual need for a lighter weight bass, but with the door now having been opened to short and medium scale basses after decades with my Ric 4001, I have nonetheless bought several, and have discovered/decided that I like them for other reasons than simply the weight factor.
So the Mustang has been a natural candidate, though I still have my overall preferences in basses, such as a wider nut width neck, Maple fretboard, and certain body finishes, which limit my choice of models - or do a parts bass Mustang as certain of y'all have done.
As for the electronics, I'm still mulling over which of the stock offerings may suit me best, or whether to go directly to modding one of them.
I'm considering the models with with the original small split pickup design, but if I ended up with a PJ Mustang, I would either not use the J pickup much, or would change it for one which cancels hum, " 'cause ah HATES hum !" [spoken in Yosemite Sam's voice], and possibly a blend control instead of a pickup switch, just because I want to try one.
Alternate tuners and bridge are a possibility but not a certainty, however definitely will go to flatwound strings of some sort, in not too light of a gauge, which eliminates some brands.
That would be MY kind of Mustang.![]()
![]()
~
Your ears are working well, they sound on par because it's the same pickup.@shoulderpet the stock P pickup is, to my ears, on par with the pickup in the 50s Classic & Vintera Precision basses. I've got a 50s Classic already or I might've kept my Mustang with stock pups.
The funny thing is I managed to mangle the original pickup when I briefly swapped it for a Duncan pickup(don't ask how) anyway I brought a pickup that came from an American Standard p bass from someone to replace it (I went Fender because I wanted something similar or the same as the stock pickup) and guess what, exact same pickupYour ears are working well, they sound on par because it's the same pickup.![]()