• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Fender predictions for 2024?

Rosewood (Dalbergia Latifolia) is still on the CITES list. However, in 2019, the list was amended with an annotation that made some exceptions:

a) Leaves, flowers, pollen, fruits, and seeds;

b) Finished products to a maximum weight of wood of the listed species of up to 10 kg per shipment;

c) Finished musical instruments, finished musical instrument parts and finished musical instrument accessories;

d) Parts and derivatives of Dalbergia cochinchinensis, which are covered by Annotation # 4; and

e) Parts and derivatives of Dalbergia spp. originating and exported from Mexico, which are covered by Annotation # 6.

It might be worth noting that other species of rosewood (some of them commonly used in guitars) are also on the CITES list but with no exceptions for musical instruments. The exception is only for Dalbergia latifolia, commonly referred to as East Indian rosewood. Dalbergia latifolia is "only" listed in the CITES Appendix II, which still makes it possible to import/export for other uses if you have the correct documentation (basically a paper trail all the way back to where the tree was cut...).

Dalbergia nigra (commonly referred to as Brazilian rosewood) which is used on LOTS of vintage instruments, is listed in CITES Appendix I, which has MUCH tighter restrictions. If you travel across borders with a vintage instrument containing Brazilian rosewood you will (at least theoretically) need the same type of permit/documentation you would need to export/import a rhinoceros. In reality, you can't legally bring a guitar containing Brazilian rosewood across international borders these days. You will probably get away with it, but you also run the risk of your guitar being confiscated (and destroyed).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: JakobT
Now that I think of it, they should definitely do a mapleglo signature model.

HKavatar copy.jpg
 
The stealth retainers are great... if you've got the right type of tuners. Unfortunately they won't work with all types of tuners, like the ones Fender use on the Player or Vintera series. I usually remove the standard Fender string tree and install a bar retainer for A-D-G on my "workhorse" Fenders. I wouldn't do it on a valuable vintage instrument though... It works great, and the tonal improvement on an open A is VERY noticable. It also makes it much easier to file the nut slot for the A-string VERY low, without compromising the tone of an open A or getting buzz from the fret slot.

Yeah, the neck profiles on the Pro/Pro II P-basses are VERY nice. Especially the first Pro series, that's a PERFECT neck for my taste. Unfortunately the rest of my Pro sucked. And not just the V-Mod and the fluted tuners but the general build quality. Bumpy fretboard (needed levelling out of the box, not jus the frets but the FRETBOARD), nasty tool marks along the edge of the fretboard and wires sticking out under the pickguard (permanently disfiguring it). How that bass passed QC is beyond me. After levelling the fretboard/frets and replacing the pickup (practically anything would be an upgrade on the anemic E-string you get with the V-Mod I) it has become a decent bass. I'll still have to replace those nasty fluted tuners at some point. I keep breaking strings when I bring the strings back up to tension after loosening them. It's not a problem with normaly day-to-day use but very annoying if I need to loosen the strings for maintenance, or simply want to test different strings.

I'll say ONE positive thing about my Pro though (in addition to the lovely neck profile): The weight is absolutely PERFECT. Not too light, not too heavy. It balances PERFECTLY, which after all my repairs/upgrades makes it an absolute joy to play!

Sorry to hear about the crap with your Pro. I've got a 2014 American Standard P, a 2017 American Pro P, a 2019 Pro P V and a 2021 Pro II P V. The Pro II neck is subtly different from the Pro, slightly more rounded edges. They’re all perfect, minus the VMod pickups, and yes the bass side is anemic. The VMod II is actually quite a bit better, but I replaced the stock on the Pro 4-string with an SPB-1 - might switch to a Pure Vintage 63 I have on a shelf. The VMod on the P V Pro will also be replaced - I wouldn’t call it good for nothing, just good for nothing that I do. Unfortunately 5-string drop in P pickups aren’t readily available, especially where I live, so I’m now waiting six weeks for a Nordstrand NP5F to be delivered. If I like it, I may put a set in the Pro II as well, but I really have no complaints on the VMod II, and my guitar player actually likes it a lot.

The 2014 neck is different for sure, but I actually like it every bit as much, and don’t find it feels at all the same as other Fender “Modern C” profile necks such as the MIM Standard or Player. It does feel the same as other American Standard P necks I’ve owned, including a 2006, a 2008, and a 2010, so I assume the rolled fretboards make that difference, or maybe they’re really just different profile dimensions with the same shape. Anyway, the American “standard” necks (either Standard, Pro, or Pro II) are my favourite bass necks ever, whether in IV or V string configs.

All but the Pro V have had a Stealth retainer added. I need to order another one, but I’ll do the pickup swap first.

From left to right:
Pro II V - Stealth on low B, stock E-A retainer
Pro V - E-A string retainer, no Stealth - B string needs a hand
Pro IV - not visible, but Stealth on A
AmStand - Stealth on A

71623645389__558E8247-3F06-4913-AD3A-6A321C7DD9B3.jpeg


And just for fun:
66924A81-AB72-4791-8256-B747F99B006B.jpeg


71623670030__E8A167EA-814E-4E28-A748-19328B1CB006.jpeg

71623672571__42203223-796E-415C-A7EF-4DD27B80BF1B.jpeg

IMG_4644.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Rosewood (Dalbergia Latifolia) is still on the CITES list. However, in 2019, the list was amended with an annotation that made some exceptions:

a) Leaves, flowers, pollen, fruits, and seeds;

b) Finished products to a maximum weight of wood of the listed species of up to 10 kg per shipment;

c) Finished musical instruments, finished musical instrument parts and finished musical instrument accessories;

d) Parts and derivatives of Dalbergia cochinchinensis, which are covered by Annotation # 4; and

e) Parts and derivatives of Dalbergia spp. originating and exported from Mexico, which are covered by Annotation # 6.
Thanks, Jakob.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JakobT
It might be worth noting that other species of rosewood (some of them commonly used in guitars) are also on the CITES list but with no exceptions for musical instruments. The exception is only for Dalbergia latifolia, commonly referred to as East Indian rosewood. Dalbergia latifolia is "only" listed in the CITES Appendix II, which still makes it possible to import/export for other uses if you have the correct documentation (basically a paper trail all the way back to where the tree was cut...).

Dalbergia nigra (commonly referred to as Brazilian rosewood) which is used on LOTS of vintage instruments, is listed in CITES Appendix I, which has MUCH tighter restrictions. If you travel across borders with a vintage instrument containing Brazilian rosewood you will (at least theoretically) need the same type of permit/documentation you would need to export/import a rhinoceros. In reality, you can't legally bring a guitar containing Brazilian rosewood across international borders these days. You will probably get away with it, but you also run the risk of your guitar being confiscated (and destroyed).
This is perfectly true - the exception only applies to Dalbergia Latifolia, of course. Thanks for the clarification. :thumbsup:
 
Last edited:
Eh, idk.....maybe a Cabronita with twin pickups, 32" scale, or maybe even 30"? Might be interesting with a couple cool color options, but I wouldn't be paying what they'd want for a USA one, or probably even a MIM one. I guess that would leave Squier for the price to be okay. Likely MIC....meh.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Naviiin
Agree that the Player series seems most ripe for updates, especially given that they're all on sale now.

I also agree that Fender is in a unique and difficult position. They have to walk a fine line of both honoring and innovating on their legacy. Other popular but smaller builders don't have to do that.

Based on stories about sales issues and the recoil effects of all that demand Covid pulled forward, it looks like the next couple years might be tricky to navigate. Anecdotally, you can see it here in the classifieds over recent months. So maybe they just tinker around the edges and streamline things? They may simply have to endure a few talkbass threads that decry boring old Fender.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DJ Bebop
I predict Fender will do something, a whole lot of people will whine about it regardless of what it is, whether it’s a P or J variant or something nobody else has ever done, and they’ll still be just as big as ever, and I’ll once again comment about how if anyone on here ran Fender, they’d be bankrupt within a year.

Seems pretty obvious to me that Fender knows what sells, and how to sell it, better than anyone else in the business. It's Fender, then "everyone else" vying for a bigger slice of the market. It's those "others" who need to innovate to gain traction, not Fender. Fender has the inertia and momentum to maintain the status quo.

I could imagine being a fly on the wall at a Fender MI boardroom meeting...

Q: "Should we be devoting more R&D on new guiter models?"
A: "Why?"
 
Seems pretty obvious to me that Fender knows what sells, and how to sell it, better than anyone else in the business. It's Fender, then "everyone else" vying for a bigger slice of the market. It's those "others" who need to innovate to gain traction, not Fender. Fender has the inertia and momentum to maintain the status quo.

I could imagine being a fly on the wall at a Fender MI boardroom meeting...

Q: "Should we be devoting more R&D on new guiter models?"
A: "Why?"

And creating new models only complicate matters as the marketing guys would have to come up more clever names for them, like "Nuevo Retro Redux"...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jeff Scott
Seems pretty obvious to me that Fender knows what sells, and how to sell it, better than anyone else in the business. It's Fender, then "everyone else" vying for a bigger slice of the market. It's those "others" who need to innovate to gain traction, not Fender. Fender has the inertia and momentum to maintain the status quo.

I could imagine being a fly on the wall at a Fender MI boardroom meeting...

Q: "Should we be devoting more R&D on new guiter models?"
A: "Why?"
Funny? Yes. But Fender still does their best to come up with new ideas and models and always has. Most don’t work out, but they do try.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DJ Bebop
Maybe this thread should be called "Predictions of TalkBassers' Reactions to Fender in 2024?"

I predict that they will continue to dominate the bass guitar market in sales. They'll sell more P and J basses than anything else they will offer (at any point in time, forever). We will continue to nitpick what they "should be doing." We will collectively gripe about lack of QC, yet will also continue to buy more new Fender basses. Fender will not care what we all think. We will not care that Fender does not care what we all think. And we will still love them no matter what. And we will still hate them no matter what.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jim C
And creating new models only complicate matters as the marketing guys would have to come up more clever names for them, like "Nuevo Retro Redux"...

You do have to wonder sometimes. Was Fender aware of all the ways a name like "Cabronita" could be taken?

The classic though has to be G&L's "Placentia" line. Really?....they couldn't foresee the jokes coming? lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: jd56hawk