Service manual guy, what is the "true" power of the 200?
First let me say I'm glad to see your post, and that you're not: dead; imprisoned, or abducted by aliens in a UFO.
'True Power Ratings' are huge bone of contention. A massive thread addressing such has recently exploded. As was explained to me by an engineer that must remain anonymous,
RMS (Root Means Square) is an old way of rating that only applies to class A and A/B tube amps. Modern solid state amps are best and most honestly rated in
'clean continuous watts'. This what Fender does. Clean Continuous Wattage is measured at 100Hz and 1,000Hz at both 8 ohms and 4 ohms. Other methods include variations on peak watts at very high levels of distortion. This is sometimes called '
burst' or 'duty cycle' rating. If you want wildly exaggerated wattage ratings while engaged in Voodoo engineering, this is your huckleberry. This is why a Rumble 500 is more powerful than an dampig pf800, or a 1000 watt sleazy or a messy D800 or a benzler 800.
So to actually answer your question, your Rumble 200 has all the
Clean Continuous Watts that Fender's Principal Engineer, Dave Lewis says it has. Which is 140 watts @8ohms and 200 @4ohms. But in Voodoo
'duty cycle' watts it would be rated at 300 and 600. A Rumble 500 would easily be rated at 1,111 Voodoo Watts.
And there is a yorkville 410 in the practice space, so I tested it that way first, but both cab and combo at knee blast floor height. Master now has to come down from noon to between 1/4-1/3 and subtractive bass eq is needed.
Sound guy had me really pull the volume and low eq down, I had the 15" on top so I could hear the mids really well.
Rumble 410 would surely be similar
Indeed! The Rumble 210 cabinet would also work well.