• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Fender Rumble Club

The 500 head puts out "only" 350 watts at 8 ohms (one Rumble cab), or 500 watts at 4 ohms (two Rumble cabs). You could get a single 4 ohm cab somewhere else.



All the Rumble cabs are 8 ohms. Other brands and configurations may be almost anything.



IF you wish to save money and/or weight the combo costs less and weighs less and gives the same result as the head and cab. Both are only 350 watts "straight up" with no additional cabs. Both need one additional 8 ohm cab to get the full 500 watts.

ok thanks for this. What sounds better the 500 combo or 500 head and cab? the head and cab will have more headroom. a lot of people recon head and cabs better than combos. combos are good for light and compact. but this will be my amp for gigging so i only move it once in a blue moon, otherwise it sits in my room so head and cab idea doesnt worry me too much. i already have a r100 combo for practice and jamming with friends so i think its good to get a head and cab now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GonePlaid
and do tubes sound better? are they clearer? personally never had chance to try a tube amp.
does the bassman offer anything tonally and in versatility and quality over the rumble?
or is it not worth the extra few bucks.

cos i was also looking at bassman 500 head with 410 neo enclosure, or a rumble 500?
Are tubes better? Hmm. They're "warmer" but it kinda depends on whether you want to get a start on a double hernia. If you're recording, the sound difference Might matter. If you're playing out, the audience won't know Or care. My SVT/810 bottom weighed over 200#(??kilos)and I was glad to never have to shlep that monster again. Dunno what the B500 head/N410 would weigh but I'm not moving it!:rollno: Addendum:B500/N410-36.7 kilos/81 #
 
Last edited:
Are tubes better? Hmm. They're "warmer" but it kinda depends on whether you want to get a start on a double hernia. If you're recording, the sound difference Might matter. If you're playing out, the audience won't know Or care. My SVT/810 bottom weighed over 200#(??kilos)and I was glad to never have to shlep that monster again. Dunno what the B500 head/N410 would weigh but I'm not moving it!:rollno: Addendum:B500/N410-36.7 kilos/81 #

ok thanks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GonePlaid
ok so ur saying the 500 head needs 2 cabs to actually reach 500 watts, and that it's actually 350 watts?

with what cabinet are you referring to?

are u saying i should get a 500 combo? is it 500 watt straight up with no additional cabs?


Head and combo both only give 350w. You need additional cab for combo or 2 cabs for the head to get the 500w
 
do tubes sound better?
To the tube amp connoisseurs & aficionados, yes, indubitably. They have greater natural harmonic distortion. Tubes also have a naturally occurring compression as they amplify the signal. If you can afford the $1,800 Fender Super Bassman head, by all means get one. Add a cabinet or two and you're very quickly talking $3,000 USD. Well worth it. :thumbsup:
 
ok thanks for this. What sounds better the 500 combo or 500 head and cab? the head and cab will have more headroom. a lot of people recon head and cabs better than combos. combos are good for light and compact. but this will be my amp for gigging so i only move it once in a blue moon, otherwise it sits in my room so head and cab idea doesnt worry me too much. i already have a r100 combo for practice and jamming with friends so i think its good to get a head and cab now.
What makes you think an amp and head have more headroom? I used a 500c with no extension for about a year before I added a 2x10.
Please don't fall into the trap of thinking combos are not for serious musicians. IMHO, the combo sound the same and is less stuff to carry around.
 
i have heard some people complaining that the rumble doesnt sound good to record. Via the XLR through to an interface or whatever. I read somewhere i think that someone said the rumbles dont sound good recording
You need to stop listening to naysayers, and pay strict attention to the hands on experience of the Rumble owners. There is one in particular that went into a recording studio, and the engineer mic'd the cab and ran the XLR out to the board. He was going to mix the two. He was so pleased with the quality of the XLR signal that he chose to use that for the entire recording. His account is right here within the many pages of the Fender Rumble Club.
 
What makes you think an amp and head have more headroom? I used a 500c with no extension for about a year before I added a 2x10.
Please don't fall into the trap of thinking combos are not for serious musicians. IMHO, the combo sound the same and is less stuff to carry around.


Oh yeah, combos are great! Only reason I needed up with head and cab is ba3cause I was going to to do the 410 cab, but they sold out of that cab. So I went 1 210 and finally ordered a second 210. So now I hav3 my 410, lol.

But I've done a huge chunk of my gigging with a GK MB212II combo and the MB115II for small gigs before I grabbed a rumble get up.
 
To the tube amp connoisseurs & aficionados, yes, indubitably. They have greater natural harmonic distortion. Tubes also have a naturally occurring compression as they amplify the signal. If you can afford the $1,800 Fender Super Bassman head, by all means get one. Add a cabinet or two and you're very quickly talking $3,000 USD. Well worth it. :thumbsup:
Do I detect a note of sarcasm there, brother?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Giffro

Latest posts