I think GlennA was using a Rumble 500 head for the test, but I don't remember. It's back there quite far.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
It does appear to be a Rumble 500 and that all makes sense, thanks!I think GlennA was using a Rumble 500 head for the test, but I don't remember. It's back there quite far.

. . . . I'm gonna take some time today to play with effects and EQ.![]()
I'm definitely going to check out some of these. My settings are usually just more mids with or without a lot of overdrive. But maybe there's something I can contribute.May I recommend that you consult the Fender Rumble Club TONE POOL for suggested settings? You're also welcome to add your own settings. We love to share.
I had already tried a Studio 40 at the Fender dealer when I read "studio quality digital effects" on here, which is why I was laughing & had to respond to that (which I think is when Linnin blocked me)!
That claim is wildly inaccurate!
but he also claims Rumbles aren't scooped:

Rumble Stage did an amazing job tonight.
What does "scooped" mean and why would Fender build this in?
See the 4 dB dip at 600 Hertz?
I'm not sure why almost every amp on Earth is scooped either![]()
IMO, it’s because the baked-in basic tone of an amp is what captures a potential buyer.
How many posts do we see on this and other forums that say, “It was easy to get my tone with a [such-and-such] amp. Didn’t need to twiddle any knobs.” Most people don’t know what their EQ controls do, nor what the effect is on the sound when any of them are changed. Add to that the understanding that many tone stacks - with some exceptions - have controls that are interactive (changes on one control affects the other controls), and it becomes confusing to many players.
Some players have a predisposition to learn about these things. Most players, in my experience, don’t. They like “plug and play”, especially when there’s no time at a gig to optimize their tone for a particular room.
That’s why you have “Ampeg guys”, “Fender guys”, “Aguilar guys”, “GK guys”, “MarkBass guys”, etc. The baked-in amp tone suits their needs, wants, and likes.
Don't get me wrong guys, I love my Studio 40 & like it just a little better than the Rumble 40 that came before it, but I don't want folks to think those effects are going to free them from their pedal boards.
stand-alone effects are just better, but I suppose that wouldn't be a surprise to most
I figured out how to use the pitch-shifter for drop-tuning, but using the DigiTech Drop just sounds better.
and it sounds nothing like a Whammy with an expression pedal
Maybe someone who is gigging with the Stage 800 can chime in, if the effects are satisfactory for them.
Apparently it is a popcorn question where anyone's opinion is just that!
Have you ever tried using the expression pedal with yours?
Not in the case of the Rumble graph I posted. You feed a flat signal in & get that U shape out = not flat, but scooped.
I'm not saying Fender is the only one, many brands do it & the only one I know that doesn't is Aguilar, but they drop off the curve after 3 kHz, which puzzles me as well. My Aguilar head sounded awful for guitar, now I know why.
G-K also scoops by default & the knob settings for "real flat" have been posted in the huge G-K thread.
It's not a matter of opinions, it's facts that have been supported with graphs.
I'm going through mine right, you've got:
<presets> loading & editing installed presets
<setlists>
<download>
<settings>:
tuner
EQ settings (global ones like "bright boost" or "low cut")
backup/restore
Tips
Inside presets you can do all the manipulation of the controls.