• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Fender Rumble Club

New owner of an Rumble 40 as of yesterday. My efforts to hold off on splashing out on one for a bit longer were hampered by the fact there were only 2 left in stock and I didn't want to miss out :-) Pictured here with a Yamaha TRBX174 which is working fine for me as a beginner to the bass since a couple of months ago.

The Rumble has had a couple of hours play and seems fine, and can certainly cope better than the pictured THR10 which didn't really have the ooomph. And the 40 seems to have been the right choice as gain and volume at 12 gets loose things rattling in the room, but below that is giving lots of variation from very quiet to loud enough for fun without being annoying to my family.

I need to spend a bit of time playing with tone controls to suit the room which can be a bit echoey and boomy, but so far it seems like a good purchase :-)

IMG_20190919_114541_2.jpg
 
New owner of an Rumble 40 as of yesterday. My efforts to hold off on splashing out on one for a bit longer were hampered by the fact there were only 2 left in stock and I didn't want to miss out :) Pictured here with a Yamaha TRBX174 which is working fine for me as a beginner to the bass since a couple of months ago.

The Rumble has had a couple of hours play and seems fine, and can certainly cope better than the pictured THR10 which didn't really have the ooomph. And the 40 seems to have been the right choice as gain and volume at 12 gets loose things rattling in the room, but below that is giving lots of variation from very quiet to loud enough for fun without being annoying to my family.

I need to spend a bit of time playing with tone controls to suit the room which can be a bit echoey and boomy, but so far it seems like a good purchase :)

View attachment 3542784


Welcome, @Mark White, you are member #1116 in the Fender Rumble Club. Looks like your Rumble 40 fits right in there, where it belongs. Thanks for sharing. We look forward to your further Rumbling exploits.
.
 
New member - hello all. Need an upgrade to my amp — been looking at the Rumble 800 HD and the Stage 800 Combo. Apart from the physical characteristics, I’m trying to understand how to decide which is the better choice for me. I like the creative aspects of the Combo but appreciate the mix & match potential in going with the HD. That said, my real curiosity is the sound comparison between the HD and Combo (with all effects, cabs, models turned off). Better/worse is relative and in the eye of the beholder ... is it possible to quantify or describe the difference. Hopefully this isn’t an impossible question. Thank you in advance for any guidance or insight.
Well... the HD doesn’t have a cabinet or effects. Otherwise they sound the same! I got the head because I already have cabinets and effects.
 
Hey guys. I joined Talk Bass after finding this forum. I really dig my Rumble 100 V3. I play in a 3 piece band that does kind of a rockin R&B thing. The 100 is perfect for me. I'm mostly playing a 2000 MIM Jazz Bass or an old Silvertone 1444. I'm excited to dive into this forum and learn more about these great amps.

Im not sure what it means to be a member of one of these forums but I know I want one of those numbers. So may I be in your club, fellas?
20190919_102118.jpg
 
New member - hello all. Need an upgrade to my amp — been looking at the Rumble 800 HD and the Stage 800 Combo. ...


Welcome, new TB member! You're in the right place to discuss Rumbles. :thumbsup:
.
... Apart from the physical characteristics, I’m trying to understand how to decide which is the better choice for me. I like the creative aspects of the [Stage 800] Combo but appreciate the mix & match potential in going with the [800] HD. ...


Stage 800 creative aspects = modelng + looper 800 HD
  • Modeling and looping, at gig-level volume, is why one buys the Stage 800. The 800 HD simply doesn't have that. ;)
800 HD mix & match potential = multiple cabs Stage 800
  • Both can mix & match with multiple cabs. The Stage 800, of course, always has its built-in 210 8-ohm cab, but can also add a 4-ohm cab or two 8-ohm cabs. The 800 HD can push up to two 4-ohm cabs or four 8-ohm cabs. :cool:
.
... That said, my real curiosity is the sound comparison between the HD and Combo (with all effects, cabs, models turned off). ...


Hmmm, ... I don't know of a way to turn off amp & cab models on the Stage & Studio. But there is a "X FX" button to disable all effects, which doesn't apply to the amp & cab models. Plugging another pre-amp signal into the left channel (mono) Effects Return can bypass the entire digital pre-amp of the Stage & Studio, but then you get the sound of that other pre-amp.

At the very least you have to select an amp model on the Stage & Studio. But you don't have to use any effects or cabs, if you don't want to. In this mode I would expect the Stage 800, using the "Rumble V3" amp model, to sound exactly like the 800 HD thru a Rumble 210 cab. But, of course, the Stage & Studio can sound like a lot of other classic and modern amps, too. Without additional effects, the 800 HD will always sound like itself, or other analog Rumbles.
.
... Better or worse is relative and in the eye of the beholder ... is it possible to quantify or describe the difference. Hopefully this isn’t an impossible question. Thank you in advance for any guidance or insight.


Quantification of sounds is best left to scientists. As a musician, I've loved the sounds of my Rumble 500 combo for almost 5 years, now. I’ve also enjoyed many, though not all, of the sounds of my Fender B-DEC 30 (their 1st generation modeling bass amp) for over 10 years! I only got the Studio 40 a few months ago, but it's easy to see they have made great progress since the B-DEC.

Hopefully, others here will describe the differences they see between the Stage 800 and the 800 HD.
.
 
Last edited:
Hey guys. I joined Talk Bass after finding this forum. I really dig my Rumble 100 V3. I play in a 3 piece band that does kind of a rockin R&B thing. The 100 is perfect for me. I'm mostly playing a 2000 MIM Jazz Bass or an old Silvertone 1444. I'm excited to dive into this forum and learn more about these great amps.

Im not sure what it means to be a member of one of these forums but I know I want one of those numbers. So may I be in your club, fellas?View attachment 3542975


Welcome, new TB member! And welcome, @Basspopper, you are member #1117 in the Fender Rumble Club. That's a fine rig you've got there! And a vintage Silvertone 1444, to boot? Neat-o!

Feel free to browse The Club thread and the Rumble Club Wiki page linked in my signature to learn more about Rumbles. Please don't hesitate to ask about anything you don't find the answers to. If no one here knows the answers, I'm sure you'll get some opinions! :D
.
 
Re: the discussion of Horn On/Off, I am doing a Climate Rally gig tomorrow and will be doing a bass intro for Neil Young’s Mother Earth. Rather than his Farm Aid fuzzed out bigsby barred LP intro, I am playing my MIM JB fretless w/D’Add tapes. Trying to get a more Jaco or Michael Hedges ‘mwah’ for that. Turns out, for this intro, I and the Jugband (1acoustic 6, a cajon, a washboard, a singer) really prefer the R200v3 set with Bright + horn, bridge pup 90%,neck pup -0- Once the intro is done I roll the neck to 100 and bridge to 75. Normally, I would run Vintage, no horn. But that is why we have these options, to get the sound that fits what we are doing, eh?
 
New member - hello all. Need an upgrade to my amp — been looking at the Rumble 800 HD and the Stage 800 Combo. Apart from the physical characteristics, I’m trying to understand how to decide which is the better choice for me. I like the creative aspects of the Combo but appreciate the mix & match potential in going with the HD. That said, my real curiosity is the sound comparison between the HD and Combo (with all effects, cabs, models turned off). Better/worse is relative and in the eye of the beholder ... is it possible to quantify or describe the difference. Hopefully this isn’t an impossible question. Thank you in advance for any guidance or insight.
Welcome to TalkBass, Mitch. I think this is a very intriguing question.
I don't have the R800 HD to directly compare the two; but, I do have the Stage 800.

@G-Dog's correct is saying that you are going to be using some kind of amp model on the Stage 800. You must choose an amp model in order to create a preset. So, at the very least, you would be using the solid-state or tube pre-amp model. This makes sense since all bass amplifiers have a pre-amp section. However, you do not have to assign a cabinet model; nor do you need add any effects.

So, given this, your question infers...
What does the hardware amp itself sound like with just a preamp (with no amp, and no cab)?
What does it sound like without cabinet models (with an amp, but no cab)?
What do the different cabinet models add (when using an amp, and a cab)?

I messed around a bit this morning on my Stage 800. When comparing models I set all the controls to the mid-point (5.5). This is by no means a scientific study; but, these are my general observations:

The solid-state pre-amp model alone is rather thin and trebly. It doesn't sound too bad, but you would certainly not want to play through the amp using it; unless you were using an acoustic or double bass, and you just wanted the added volume (and that's what the Acoustasonic model is for). The solid-state preamp model is described as "studio purity with clean, uncolored tonal response". I would agree with this assessment. It probably works great as an "$800 DI" ;), but it doesn't sound great through the amp.

The tube pre-amp model alone actually sounds pretty good through the amp even with all the settings "nickled". It has just some basic "harmonic coloration", but it sounds fairly full-bodied. It's certainly playable in its own right; but it's very basic.

Without cab models, the other amps are very much like enhanced versions of the tube preamp. They sound good through the physical cab without a cab model; but, the cabs add a degree of fullness and tonal refinement that I don't think one would choose to forego.

I used the basic preamp models and went through the different cabinets to see what differences they made. I would grossly oversimplify my findings like this:

Firstly, the 1x8" speaker should be called an "pizza box" effect, not a cabinet. It's kinda like the "telephone" effect on vocals. If you intentionally want to sound that effect, use it; otherwise, avoid it.

The 10" and 12" cabinets to me essentially provide variations that I would call "EQ spectra-focused". The 10" seem to enhance the mids and highs; and the 2x and 4x models both sizes provide more lower mids and additional bass, respectively. That is not to say they don't have unique characteristics among them (e.g. the extreme clarity of the Redhead cabs; the differences between sealed/open and vintage/neo). (I did admit this was oversimplified.)

The 15" and 18" speakers are where I think the speaker models truly result in added "apparent girth". (Especially the 2x15 JBL D130F cab model. It's a bottom-end monster.) These models really do make the physical 2x10 in the Stage 800 combo seem bigger than it is.

Beyond the cabs, if you replace the pre-amp with an amp model, you get all the other goodness of a full amplifier: power amp effects (sag, bias), channel overdrive, increased EQ functions (vintage, bright, scooping, contour), etc. Additionally, the output of the amp models seem better matched to the physical power amp of the Stage 800.

Having said all of this, I would again agree with @G-Dog in saying, to compare them, running the Rumble V3 amp model with the 2x10 Rumble V3 should produce the standard modern Rumble sound.

The deciding factor for me, as many know, is the recallable presets. I like being able to instantly retrieve a prior tone. But I also like the onboard effects. Aside from compression, I don't use a lot of effect, but when I want them I don't need a separate pedalboard. The all-in-one form-factor is nice, too.

Hope this helps.
 
@Droopy_TX and @G-Dog:
Thanks for the insightful answers - I appreciate your time in constructing those.

I like effects for creativity but would imagine probably only using a few playing out. My fear, I think, is that I might not find a “straight up” sound that I like. The “pizza box” and “telephone” comparisons didn’t add to confidence but I know there is more offered in this box and there must be at least 98 other reasons why this combo gets such good reviews.

I play multiple genres - mostly on a Jazz but sometimes on a P-Bass too. It was good to learn that plugging in another preamp into the Effects Return would bypass the digital pre ... just as an option as I have been playing through a Sansamp PSA-1 for years.

At end of the day, I also agree with Droopy_TX about having instant recall of patches.

Thanks a million times over for the thoughts and inspiration.
 
Hi Guys! Happy Friday! I have a question...I've got a 500c and after reading all the comments about turning off the horn I decided to try it.....there was no difference in the sound. I have my volume very very low because I have neighbors on both sides of me. Is it something that would only be noticed when running at volume?
I felt the same way about both the 200c and 500c in my in store demos. Curious about what the owners say. I have noticed most say the preference is off, so there must some noticeable difference (or placebo effect ;) )
 
Hi Guys! Happy Friday! I have a question...I've got a 500c and after reading all the comments about turning off the horn I decided to try it.....there was no difference in the sound. I have my volume very very low because I have neighbors on both sides of me. Is it something that would only be noticed when running at volume?
You're probably not going to notice much of a difference at a whisper volume. Ramp it up a bit and see if you notice a difference. The Rumble cabs have a 3 position rocker switch for the horn which includes; off, full, and -6dB cut. Not sure why the R500Cs didn't include that. It's a nice option.
 
You're probably not going to notice much of a difference at a whisper volume. Ramp it up a bit and see if you notice a difference. The Rumble cabs have a 3 position rocker switch for the horn which includes; off, full, and -6dB cut. Not sure why the R500Cs didn't include that. It's a nice option.
Thanks Kip!
 
The “pizza box” and “telephone” comparisons didn’t add to confidence...
Don't get me wrong. I am referring to just the 1x8 cab model with this analogy.

The docs describe the model as an "under-powered vintage small-speaker". So, the distorted tone is purposeful. Bear in mind, the physical speaker is not actually distorting; the cab model just sounds like it is. I guess it has its uses. I just don't think it'll get a lot of mileage from me.

The rest of the cab models are all perfectly usable.

I have tended to favor the "4x10 Pro" and "2x10 Rumble V3" cab models for my live use; but, I will likely try out that "2x15 D130" (based on the Fender Showman cab w/JBL D130F speakers) when we perform tomorrow night.

From the reviews of both models, I don't think you can go wrong either way. For many, "optionality" seems to be the deciding factor versus "performance". To me, it seems that folks who already have (or know) the extension cabs they like, and use only a few tonal settings tend to favor the 800HD. For folks like me that need a cab to go with it, and like the tonal variation and recall of the modeling world, they lean toward the combo. I think price performance weighs into the decision of those going with the latter, too.

Good luck to you in your own testing and review, and with your ultimate direction.
 
Last edited: