I replaced the V-Mods in my American Pro 1 with a stock-wound Lindy Fralin set. I am MUCH happier with the Fralins than the V-mods. Just another data point . . .
Last edited:
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I agree with this 100%. I don't like the V-Mods because they're too polite and mid-scoopy. I've compared them to a P bass with Geezer and the Geezer smoked it as far as I'm concerned because it sounds like a proper early 60's P pickup (cloned from the pickup in Bobby Vega's 1960 Precision). The SPB-1 is also a great choice if you like that type of sound but want to cut down slightly on the upper mids. Lollar and Lindy Fralin also make cool pickups, but the Geezers are my jam, and would be even if I didn't endorse EMG![]()
Now, the P-bass’ role to counter that and give me variety. I intend yo switch from the doomish 5 to the presicion 4 depending on the song, project, show. In a way, I want the P-bass gentle, less aggressive.
Geezers easily do gentle. You play gentle, they sound gentle. They just don't force you into sounding gentle when you don't want that. They're not everyone's favorite and no one pickup is, but they totally do gentle.Now, this gets me thinking, but in a quite opposite direction than you probably intended.
I play extremely different music, ranging from industrial metal to improv jazz. My main bass is the heavily modded active Sterling 5, where I have installed Delano ceramic pickups and the Darkglass preamp. Combined with heavier string gauge, the thing sounds like a weapon of mass destruction, which is exactly what I intended.
Now, the P-bass’ role to counter that and give me variety. I intend yo switch from the doomish 5 to the presicion 4 depending on the song, project, show. In a way, I want the P-bass gentle, less aggressive.
Given, I’m itching for the GZR’s, but I don’t want to miss my own point.
Are the V-Mod II a real improvement over the I?
I am not familiar with the stock pickups of that bass, but the EMG Geezer Butler P pickup is amazing.
The EMG Geezer Butler P pickup leans towards a vintage P tone (in fact it is actually supposed to be a pretty faithful recreation of the original pickup of Bobby Vega's '63 Fender P Bass), but is slightly more aggressive and slightly hotter than your typical vintage P pickup, overall it has an extraordinary clarity and definition and is exceptionally articulated, a quite balanced open kind of tone, but with a slight emphasis of the upper mids spectrum, which gives it a nice amount of bite and snap, it also has a very well defined top end without in any way sounding harsh, which contribute to the pickup's exceptional clarity.
Not sure where you heard that these p/u's are from BV's P bass. Especially, since the blurb on the EMG mentions nothing about it . . . Invalid Link Removed I can imagine that they've used BY's J basses on a few occasions to come up with some of their more vintage sounding p/u's so, maybe that's what you're thinking
. . . ?
I agree with this 100%. I don't like the V-Mods because they're too polite and mid-scoopy. I've compared them to a P bass with Geezer and the Geezer smoked it as far as I'm concerned because it sounds like a proper early 60's P pickup (cloned from the pickup in Bobby Vega's 1960 Precision). The SPB-1 is also a great choice if you like that type of sound but want to cut down slightly on the upper mids. Lollar and Lindy Fralin also make cool pickups, but the Geezers are my jam, and would be even if I didn't endorse EMG![]()
Not sure where you heard that these p/u's are from BV's P bass. Especially, since the blurb on the EMG mentions nothing about it . . . Invalid Link Removed I can imagine that they've used BY's J basses on a few occasions to come up with some of their more vintage sounding p/u's so, maybe that's what you're thinking
. . . ?
Yes, ask me. I heard it from two people...Ask @JimmyM , or search on Google ("EMG Geezer Butler P pickup Bobby Vega P Bass").
Yes, ask me. I heard it from two people...
1. Chrys Johnson, who used to work at Ampeg and EMG as head of artist relations. He brokered the entire EMG/Geezer deal, and asked me to relay info about the pickups to address some concerns that TB'ers had in exchange for a couple sets two months before they came out.
2. Bobby Vega. He used to work at EMG, and did a clinic at Ampeg's room during NAMM 2019, after which I stopped him and thanked him for "sacrificing" his 60 P-Bass for the Geezers. He then spent about a minute and a half briefly describing the process.
So I believe it.
First he said, "Man, those are some wide sounding pickups!" Then he said basically that Rob Turner measured them, made a couple prototypes and gave them to Bobby, and he'd give feedback on what he thought they needed to sound like his 60 pickup, and after a couple tries he hit on it. Pretty much the exact story you'd expect about pickup development, except told in the inimitable Bobby Vega style.Out of curiosity, what did Bobby say about the process?
First he said, "Man, those are some wide sounding pickups!" Then he said basically that Rob Turner measured them, made a couple prototypes and gave them to Bobby, and he'd give feedback on what he thought they needed to sound like his 60 pickup, and after a couple tries he hit on it. Pretty much the exact story you'd expect about pickup development, except told in the inimitable Bobby Vega style.
BTW, I should clarify that it was the 60 P Bobby has, not the 63. I don't know what the differences are tonally between them, but they used the 60 for the design.
Just so we're perfectly clear, it was a 1960 P Bass, not just a 60's eraThanks.
I kind of had hoped for a bit more detailed description of the technical aspect of it, but I did also suspect that it would not be, Bobby is a great storyteller, but the finer nuances of technicalities is, to put it mildly, not what he does best (well obviously when playing bass it is, but he does seem to struggle a bit with putting it into words, probably because it doesn't really interests him).
Also thanks for clarifying it was the '60s P Bass, I have read the '63 mentioned in relation to the Geezers.
Just so we're perfectly clear, it was a 1960 P Bass, not just a 60's era
And I caught him as he was leaving and he was walking like he had to be somewhere, so I didn't get an in depth with him. I was there at the clinic, but I got called out in the middle by Hodgy from Ampeg, who wanted me to make an appearance of my own...
View attachment 4360292
Makin' the gravy, as Bobby says![]()

3610. Jeff Pilson from Dokken and Foreigner was there that day too, and was really excited to see it again because he commissioned them for a Monsters Of Rock tour back in the day. On top is an SVT-CL preamp powered by two 300w SVT power sections.I know.
I edited the '60s to '60.
That's quite the cabinet there.![]()
Yes, ask me. I heard it from two people...
1. Chrys Johnson, who used to work at Ampeg and EMG as head of artist relations. He brokered the entire EMG/Geezer deal, and asked me to relay info about the pickups to address some concerns that TB'ers had in exchange for a couple sets two months before they came out.
2. Bobby Vega. He used to work at EMG, and did a clinic at Ampeg's room during NAMM 2019, after which I stopped him and thanked him for "sacrificing" his 60 P-Bass for the Geezers. He then spent about a minute and a half briefly describing the process.
So I believe it.