Do you have a specific router bit you like for that?I really like the precision and perfect result you get with a router sled. Everyone should try it at some point, they're very useful...
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Do you have a specific router bit you like for that?I really like the precision and perfect result you get with a router sled. Everyone should try it at some point, they're very useful...
A true luthier is willing to sacrifice.Don't your balls get sore?......

Thanks @dwizum, so that's a "mortising" bit right?Yeah, I have the Freud 1 1/4" bit for router planing - the one that seems really popular on here.
I've had good (but slow) luck using a belt sander and a random orbital. But that was on a multi laminate dresser top. So it was all flat, rather than with the fretboard sticking up. I'm the king of "slow and steady" building, which is why I don't have a business doing it.So as you can imagine, the body wings are not perfectly level with the neck-thru portion. using the hand plane isn't working so well because the multi-lam neck-thru portion has grain running in opposite directions and then the wings have grain also running all kinds of wonky directions. Yay Zebrawood! If anyone ever says "I'mma build my very first ever build out of Zebrawood!" I'm gonna slap 'em right in the mouth, Buford T, Justice style!
I'm thinking maybe setting up a planing sled for the router out of this MDF I have on hand would be the better idea here, no? Or is there a way to hand sand this thing level? I'm all ears! Altho, the planing sled may need to wait, because it would mean dragging out the table saw and kicking the garage door open. And I don't know if you've heard the news about our air quality up here just a bit south of Seattle, but.....
View attachment 3981720
![]()
![]()
![]()
Thanks @dwizum, so that's a "mortising" bit right?

Jeez... I hope not.I assume this will get less nerve wracking at some point. Man I hope so. Somebody tell me it does!

You are doing great.![]()
Wow!.....This should be a sticky or something......Brilliant!....This bears repeating!
You've started with a really difficult combination of body shape, neck style, and wood choice. You're using some challenging techniques for the first time, and you're pulling it off. That's really impressive!
If I were in your shoes, and had the body at that state, I'd probably stop routing and use a half round rasp to finish shaping the horns down to the lines.
In terms of routing technique, All those little pointy bits on your horns are begging for tearout, or for the pointy bit to be ripped right off - but you managed to cut them pretty cleanly, in zebrawood, which is pretty brittle. I have some thoughts on your comments regarding how the routing went, but really just has helpful suggestions (which you may already know) and not critically in any sense - because, again, you did a great job.
Working with a plunge router is great when you really need to be able to plunge, but when cutting an outside template like this, it's a lot easier (IME) to just lock it in place and pretend it's a fixed base router. Then you're not fighting to keep the springs compressed while you're routing. Most plunge bases have a lever to lock the router in the down position. That's what I would do for this. Maybe you were already doing that, but it bears mentioning.
You talked about having a bit as thick as the body and doing it in a single pass - I find it's less nerve wracking (and less chance of tearout) if you use a shorter bit and do it in two passes. This is easiest with a top bearing and a template mounted on top. The first pass has the bearing riding on the template and you cut the top "half" of the depth. Then you remove the template, let the router ride on the body, and use the already-cut portion as your template to cut the bottom half. Only half as much wood in each bite means the router will be easier to control and less chance of tearout. Two good things, especially when you're just starting.
You mentioned the bit wanting to jump when it touched the end grain. I wonder if you were climb cutting there? Perhaps unintentionally? For an outside template like this (as opposed to an inside template like a pickup cavity), when viewed from above, conventional cutting would be moving the router in a counter clockwise direction, and climb cutting would be clockwise. The difference has to do with the relationship between the direction the bit is spinning and the direction you're moving the router.
In a conventional cut, the blade is coming up out of the workpiece on the leading edge. This leads to a much, much more stable feel in holding the router, since the blade is basically pulling the router into the workpiece, which keeps things steady. The downside is, because the blade is coming up out of the wood, tearout is much more likely.
A climb cut has the blade biting down into the workpiece on the leading edge. It tends to compress the fibers as it cuts, instead of ripping them out. So, less tearout. But, the blade will also be constantly trying to pull the router away from the work, which makes it feel jumpy. It'll feel like the router is trying to run away (and it can, literally, run away - I once watched someone who was climb cutting and not really paying attention, and the router pulled right out of their hands and spun off into the wall).
Climb cutting can be really scary, but when you get the hang of it, and you realize all it takes is a good solid commanding grip on the router, it can be your best friend for avoiding tearout. The thing is though, you need to know which you're doing at any point in time so you're not surprised when you either rip off a chunk of wood (because you were conventional cutting and maybe should have been climb cutting) or the router tries to bounce off the workpiece (climb cutting and not paying attention!)
So the trick is picking where you do each style of cut. When conventional cutting, wood tears out when you're approaching an outside corner or point - a spot where you're coming up to the tangent between the grain and the curve. If you're cutting "down" across grain, you're fine. When you're cutting "up" across the line of the grain, and you're approaching a spot where you're going to change direction (a curve or a point), that's where tearout will happen. So those are the spots I tend to climb. Basically, I start out conventional cutting the perimeter, and as I approach a spot where I want to climb cut, I slide the router away from the workpiece so the bit stops cutting, go past the area in question, and bring it back down into the work - then climb cut "backwards" to where I lifted off. Then I slide away again, back past the area I just cut, and re-engage so I can continue conventional cutting. This is easier shown that written.
I tried to draw out how I would approach your body. Pink is conventional cutting, purple is climb cutting. I numbered the segments in the order I would do them.
View attachment 3982970
I also did a zoomed in explanation of moving the router past a section to climb cut. Orange is cutting, green is not cutting, numbered in order:
View attachment 3982971
And I know this has probably been beaten to death by now, but you can always cut off less in each pass if you've got enough waste to remove that the router is misbehaving. Each of those cuts I have a line for could be two or three or four passes, if the waste was thick enough. You don't need to push the bearing against the template and just cut, you can let the bit just barely graze the waste and just go over the spot doing that until the bearing touches. Sometimes it is easier to just push the bearing to the template, since it gives you a way to steady the router. If I think that's going to be the case (like, cutting across your wenge neck stripes) I try to leave as little waste as possible.
One final "bit" of advice - smaller bits are easier to control! Above I mentioned using a shorter bit to cut off less waste in each pass. That helps since there's less bit in the wood so there's less leverage for the bit to fight you. A bit with a smaller diameter will reduce the torque the cutting edge is able to exert on the wood, and again reduce the leverage it has to fight you. Smaller bits are slower to work with, but IME it's worth it for the reduced stress. I'd rather have 8 minutes of low stress routing than 4 minutes of terrifying routing!
All that said, you've done the most difficult part so you can take a break. Pickup cavities aren't as tough IME. The router is supported all the way around, so you don't have to fight to keep it level. And there's really nowhere for it to tear out, since you're basically cutting straight across or parallel to the grain. I use a shallow bit for pickup cavities and take many passes - probably cutting 1/8" to 3/16" of depth in each pass, until I get to the final depth. Hog it out with a forstner bit to within 1/16" of final depth and it really just becomes a game of making circles around and around shaving off just a bit of wood until the bearing is riding on the template. Then drop the depth down a step and repeat...

Excellent diagram, one picture being literally more useful than 100 words. I've been wondering if the finely graded bearing wheels LMI and Stewmac sell for binding channels (metered in .010" increments) would help with multiple passes on wild grain. That way you could always keep the bearing tight to template, and gradually "sneak" up to your final cut in .010" passes.
Thanks Rock! Means a lot....You are doing great.![]()
Thanks Rock! Means a lot.
I feel like sometimes the bar is pretty high here in the LC. You guys are amazing and turn out some insane work.
Thanks @dwizum! This is an amazingly awesome post, and I appreciate you just taking the time to just type all this, much less share the info.This bears repeating!
You've started with a really difficult combination of body shape, neck style, and wood choice. You're using some challenging techniques for the first time, and you're pulling it off. That's really impressive!...
Yeah, I was kind of thinking the same thing, just because I don't really want to wait until I go out to the woodshed again and I have a half-round file on hand and have become pretty good friends with it....If I were in your shoes, and had the body at that state, I'd probably stop routing and use a half round rasp to finish shaping the horns down to the lines....
Yup, I did use the plunge lock (I think that's what they called it in the manual). Took me some time to set the depth stop exactly where I wanted it, then I'd push it down and lock it before I started trying to make it cut. I saw zero way that I was gonna be able to hold it down while moving it around. Looking back on it, this is one of those things where I'm really good at making my life harder because I could have just put it in the stationary base and set the depth and went to town. I'm still not sure why I didn't consider switching bases. Probably because my brain was thinking "you need the bit not exposed when you turn the thing on, because fingers are cool" or something like that. I don't know....
In terms of routing technique, All those little pointy bits on your horns are begging for tearout, or for the pointy bit to be ripped right off - but you managed to cut them pretty cleanly, in zebrawood, which is pretty brittle. I have some thoughts on your comments regarding how the routing went, but really just has helpful suggestions (which you may already know) and not critically in any sense - because, again, you did a great job.
Working with a plunge router is great when you really need to be able to plunge, but when cutting an outside template like this, it's a lot easier (IME) to just lock it in place and pretend it's a fixed base router. Then you're not fighting to keep the springs compressed while you're routing. Most plunge bases have a lever to lock the router in the down position. That's what I would do for this. Maybe you were already doing that, but it bears mentioning....
I totally agree here. This was just a case of "Tim didn't want to wait" and the pile of bits I had on hand were all rather long bottom bearing stuff, no short top bearing bit. I will FOR SURE be adding something like a 1/2" length top bearing bit to my "collection" soon. I would much rather do it exactly like you described. But like I said, sometimes I just run out of patience....
You talked about having a bit as thick as the body and doing it in a single pass - I find it's less nerve wracking (and less chance of tearout) if you use a shorter bit and do it in two passes. This is easiest with a top bearing and a template mounted on top. The first pass has the bearing riding on the template and you cut the top "half" of the depth. Then you remove the template, let the router ride on the body, and use the already-cut portion as your template to cut the bottom half. Only half as much wood in each bite means the router will be easier to control and less chance of tearout. Two good things, especially when you're just starting....
Wow, this is amazing info, thank you for all of that. I need some time to read it a few times and digest all of it before I will fully understand, but this is great stuff!...
You mentioned the bit wanting to jump when it touched the end grain. I wonder if you were climb cutting there? Perhaps unintentionally? For an outside template like this (as opposed to an inside template like a pickup cavity), when viewed from above, conventional cutting would be moving the router in a counter clockwise direction, and climb cutting would be clockwise. The difference has to do with the relationship between the direction the bit is spinning and the direction you're moving the router.
In a conventional cut, the blade is coming up out of the workpiece on the leading edge. This leads to a much, much more stable feel in holding the router, since the blade is basically pulling the router into the workpiece, which keeps things steady. The downside is, because the blade is coming up out of the wood, tearout is much more likely.
A climb cut has the blade biting down into the workpiece on the leading edge. It tends to compress the fibers as it cuts, instead of ripping them out. So, less tearout. But, the blade will also be constantly trying to pull the router away from the work, which makes it feel jumpy. It'll feel like the router is trying to run away (and it can, literally, run away - I once watched someone who was climb cutting and not really paying attention, and the router pulled right out of their hands and spun off into the wall).
Climb cutting can be really scary, but when you get the hang of it, and you realize all it takes is a good solid commanding grip on the router, it can be your best friend for avoiding tearout. The thing is though, you need to know which you're doing at any point in time so you're not surprised when you either rip off a chunk of wood (because you were conventional cutting and maybe should have been climb cutting) or the router tries to bounce off the workpiece (climb cutting and not paying attention!)
So the trick is picking where you do each style of cut. When conventional cutting, wood tears out when you're approaching an outside corner or point - a spot where you're coming up to the tangent between the grain and the curve. If you're cutting "down" across grain, you're fine. When you're cutting "up" across the line of the grain, and you're approaching a spot where you're going to change direction (a curve or a point), that's where tearout will happen. So those are the spots I tend to climb. Basically, I start out conventional cutting the perimeter, and as I approach a spot where I want to climb cut, I slide the router away from the workpiece so the bit stops cutting, go past the area in question, and bring it back down into the work - then climb cut "backwards" to where I lifted off. Then I slide away again, back past the area I just cut, and re-engage so I can continue conventional cutting. This is easier shown that written.
I tried to draw out how I would approach your body. Pink is conventional cutting, purple is climb cutting. I numbered the segments in the order I would do them.
View attachment 3982970
I also did a zoomed in explanation of moving the router past a section to climb cut. Orange is cutting, green is not cutting, numbered in order:
View attachment 3982971
...

You just use a fixed base for pup and control cavities? Hog it out with the forstner and then fixed base router?I use the plunge base on my router for my circle cutting jig, to cut soundholes and rosettes on acoustic instruments. I don't think I've ever used it on a solid body instrument!