Well put.
I don't think anyone really believes her accomplishments should be completely overshadowed by her problems. We should recognize her accomplishments, which for some of us are pretty profound, including myself. I have several Whitney CDs on the shelf, and as a club DJ back in the day I used to play her music several times a night.
But we're talking about what should be considered a very special form of recognition that some of us feel should be reserved for very special people. Some of the entertainers and other notables mentioned on this thread who have had state and national recognition with rituals of flag lowering and such, I'm not sure they deserved it either. I'm not sure they are truly "national treasures."
And even if you think they are, for their devastating lifestyle choices to be swept under the carpet so we can have a warm fuzzy feel good send-off party is the the real issue. Her drug problems and the destruction they caused should be highlighted and used as a warning to others. Instead of the American flag, we should be talking about the red warning flag.
People who sell records, do some charity, and then spend a couple of decades destroying themselves, I'm not sure that qualifies as a national treasure as much as it qualifies as a warning call and negative example. But all we're getting is the warm fuzzy, and flag lowering is kinda over the top for many of us.
I watched a VH1 special about Whitney. 99% on her achievements, 1% about how she spent 25 years deteriorating and unable to get clean.
By declaring Whitney a national treasure and shining example, we're sending the wrong message.