• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Fleabasses sound better than Stingrays

May 29, 2006
2,348
33
Yes, Im talking about the stingray knockoffs sounding better than the real thing itself. No doubt the real Rays are made of more expensive components and is prolly ahead of the fleabass in terms of finish and (maybe) playability. But I find that I consistently find the sound of a fleabass more appealing.

What I feel generally:

Stingray: clicky/sizzly high end, high mids pronounced, thin sounding g string, can still get low end from onboard eq but lacking low mids. Growly.

Fleabass: smoother treble, high mids still present but with a much stronger low mid presence, and a bassier G string. I would describe it as punchy

I found some clips on youtube for comparison, below is 2 bassists playing the same song. First the stingray:

YouTube - ‪Evolution - BECK [OST] [Bass cover]‬‏

Then, the fleabass:

YouTube - ‪Beck - EVOLUTION [Bass Cover]‬‏

Granted the 2nd bassist is arguably more proficient, the difference in the bass sound is pretty prominent.
 
MM sounds better IMO

It's just a simple eq issue with the amp or bass, I don't even need 10 mins to get it sounding like it should, 1 min tops, just a couple twists of the knobs

The flea sounds pretty good in that environment, but put it through a system with that tone and it will sound muddy and will get lost.
 
He used rays to begin with, but doesn't use them anymore.

Proof he uses fleabasses:
YouTube - ‪Red Hot Chili Peppers - Under the Bridge [Live at Slane Castle] HD‬‏

You get a good view at 3:55

I actually only liked his Jazz and Modulas tones

That IS his Modulus. The Slane Castle show was recorded seven or eight years ago, LONG before the Flea Bass came about.

And personally I think his Wal tone was far better than any other of his tones, live or recorded.

That goes for Geddy Lee too.
 
Yes, Im talking about the stingray knockoffs sounding better than the real thing itself. No doubt the real Rays are made of more expensive components and is prolly ahead of the fleabass in terms of finish and (maybe) playability. But I find that I consistently find the sound of a fleabass more appealing.

What I feel generally:

Stingray: clicky/sizzly high end, high mids pronounced, thin sounding g string, can still get low end from onboard eq but lacking low mids. Growly.

Fleabass: smoother treble, high mids still present but with a much stronger low mid presence, and a bassier G string. I would describe it as punchy

I found some clips on youtube for comparison, below is 2 bassists playing the same song. First the stingray:

YouTube - ‪Evolution - BECK [OST] [Bass cover]‬‏

Then, the fleabass:

YouTube - ‪Beck - EVOLUTION [Bass Cover]‬‏

Granted the 2nd bassist is arguably more proficient, the difference in the bass sound is pretty prominent.

Hey, whatever does it for you!

But if you judge two basses by youtube videos... :rolleyes:

My Stingray experience is different from what you describe, and is my favourite.
I suggest you try the actual basses, if possible with similar equipment... and if you still prefer the Fleabass, then power to you! Win! :bassist:
 
Hey, that's me playing on the first vid. I agree though that ken is a better player than me.
But I would like to say that on that video, I have my eq set flat on bass on my board. I can easily have a tone like him if I wanted to, but it's not the tone that I really dig.
 

Latest posts