Laughing! +1. Very well said.
I might be guilty of this -- at least a little. But take a bass with 60s specs (pickup positions, alder body, rosewood board) and it's tone inspires different choices in me than a 70s spec bass (pickup positions, ash body, maple board).
I wouldn't say I "need" the tone to be inspired, but I am definitely affected by it.
It's like I want to stay within the character of the bass -- unless, of course the idea is to deliberately go contrary to it. But a bass's tone affects me and I like to use that if the situation allows me to.
However, I used to play French horn, trumpet and bass clarinet too in younger days, and while the notes I played were not my choice, they were the notes the composer or arranger wrote for me to play, I did notice that the arrangers and composers likewise seemed affected by the tones each instrument had because they would make very different choices for each instrument in the same piece. Consequently, I have never questioned the concept of letting an instrument's tone inspire my play. Until right now anyway.
Then again, I haven't had the luxury of playing original music much, like you get to do, Joe. When it is original, you get MUCH more leeway in what voice you want to have for your music.
But back to your earlier point, I strongly agree.
When a bass player plays to impress rather than express, then his bad musical choices pretty much make me not care if his tone was good or not.
i dont ever really play any of my own stuff. i split my time playing in a cover band playing 70's/80's funk and r&b and an original pop act. i definitely think about tone but its only really to the extent of "do i use treble or turn it down"
hows that for a stupid-ass reason to buy something. 2500 or 2800 or something for an emperor 5 bolt on with duncan duals. those were the days!