• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Fodera Club Part XIV

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeah I got small hands too. I used to play an MTD 6 string and those basses are waaaay 2 big. I started going down in size from that bass, went to a warwick 4 then to a ken smith 6 (which was big too but not as much as the MTD) and now the only 2 basses I own are a P bass and a MG 5 fodera which is a 33". So far my fodera feels the most comfortable.
 
roadkill2309 said:
I shouldn't like that. I'm not into singlecuts, tight string spacing or shortscales.

But, seeing as I have freakishly small hands and am just starting to explore chording, that bass makes me wish I had an extra 10 large sitting around.

I am into singlecuts, like tight spacing on a 5 and short scales.

Don't have freakishly small hands not exploring chording.

However, I also wish I had some spare cash sitting around. . .
 
Yeah I got small hands too. I used to play an MTD 6 string and those basses are waaaay 2 big. I started going down in size from that bass, went to a warwick 4 then to a ken smith 6 (which was big too but not as much as the MTD) and now the only 2 basses I own are a P bass and a MG 5 fodera which is a 33". So far my fodera feels the most comfortable.

For straight-up trad bass playing (as in, not chording), I'm good with 35" scales because I spend most of my time between frets 5 and 12 -- though my Sadowsky and Fender are both 34. I buy the concept that the 35" B-string is best, though I'm not convinced that it's better enough to count, compared to my Sadowsky or my P Bass.

For chording, I'm finding even my 34s to be a bit of a stretch.

I'm not convinced that I'm going about the chords properly, though. I'm just going on basic chord shapes rather than using any sort of bass-specific resource.

I am into singlecuts, like tight spacing on a 5 and short scales.

Don't have freakishly small hands not exploring chording.

However, I also wish I had some spare cash sitting around. . .

So you and I epitomise the 'different strokes for different folks' concept, then. What do you play as your main bass?
 
roadkill2309 said:
For straight-up trad bass playing (as in, not chording), I'm good with 35" scales, though my Sadowsky and Fender are both 34. I buy the concept that the 35" B-string is best, though I'm not convinced that it's better enough to count, compared to my Sadowsky or my P Bass.

For chording, I'm finding even my 34s to be a bit of a stretch.

I'm not convinced that I'm going about the chords properly, though. I'm just going on basic chord shapes rather than using any sort of bass-specific resource.

So you and I epitomise the 'different strokes for different folks' concept, then. What do you play as your main bass?

Tough call - main choice I between:

'63 Fender Jazz
Ritter Cora 4 - 33" scale
Old '86 Monarch 4 with PJ

The Ritter is the easiest the play and amazingly flexible, the J just has a killer core tone and the Monarch is an all round solid gigging bass that covers a lot of ground.

If I had to choose just one it would be the Ritter with the Jazz a close 2nd . . .
 
Molan said:
Tough call - main choice I between:

'63 Fender Jazz
Ritter Cora 4 - 33" scale
Old '86 Monarch 4 with PJ

The Ritter is the easiest the play and amazingly flexible, the J just has a killer core tone and the Monarch is an all round solid gigging bass that covers a lot of ground.

If I had to choose just one it would be the Ritter with the Jazz a close 2nd . . .

Ritter, eh? I could never get with the aesthetics, but from the sound clips I've heard, can't fault the sound. I also hear tell that the ergonomics are amazing.

I've been playing my Sadowsky exclusively lately, as it's only 8 lbs and I blew my back building a hunting blind three months ago. I'd put my P as number two otherwise. For all these fancy basses we like, sometimes a nice Fender is just food for the soul.

I still really want an Emperor one day, though...
 
roadkill2309 said:
Ritter, eh? I could never get with the aesthetics, but from the sound clips I've heard, can't fault the sound. I also hear tell that the ergonomics are amazing.

I've been playing my Sadowsky exclusively lately, as it's only 8 lbs and I blew my back building a hunting blind three months ago. I'd put my P as number two otherwise. For all these fancy basses we like, sometimes a nice Fender is just food for the soul.

I still really want an Emperor one day, though...

Fender+1 food for the soul. Perfectly said.
 
Hey guys,

I'm looking to trade for a 34" Chestnut bass if anyone is interested...

7488282202_f4fe45fb78.jpg


7488303140_88032d618c.jpg


Thanks!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.