• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Fodera Club Part XIX

Status
Not open for further replies.
Interesting three headstock styles for the 5 string basses...

Shortest B...
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]

Longer B, the style I like best, and the style I'm getting...
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]

Longest B... can't get used to the looks on this one myself...
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
 
Interesting three headstock styles for the 5 string basses...

Shortest B...
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]

Longer B, the style I like best, and the style I'm getting...
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]

Longest B... can't get used to the looks on this one myself...
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]

Yeah option number 3 somehow doesn't look right. For me either of option 1 or 2 is fine. Still thinking of
my "Son of AJ" idea presentation shape in a 5 string version. Single sweet spot SD dual coil, still toying
with the full electronics vs none. Gotta have the flamed maple top and pau ferro FB to match my E5S.
Scale length at 35" because the 36" would hav emy left hand begging for mercy. One can dream. LOL
 
Interesting three headstock styles for the 5 string basses...

Shortest B...
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]

Longer B, the style I like best, and the style I'm getting...
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]

Longest B... can't get used to the looks on this one myself...
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]

I'm with you. I love the look on that second one. The extended B looks *really* off to me.
 
Thanks for the kind words. I really want to reiterate that Joey, Vinny and I all believe that EVERY major aspect of a build makes an important difference in the final tone of an instrument. The choice of woods, the mass of the woods, the pickup spacing, the mass of the bridge, the mass of the tuners, the kind of pickups, the electronics, the thickness of the neck...literally every major decision that is made changes the overall sound of the instrument.

The reality is that the LAST piece of the puzzle is the preamp. Every other decision (many of which cannot be changed) comes before the preamp and if you don't like the sum total of what the instrument sounds like passively, you'll never really love it no matter what preamp / amp combination you go with.

Again, this is our thinking and the way that we approach building. There are many out there that do not believe in this philosophy. That said, I trust what my ears tell me more than anything I read...

I hope that this makes some kind of sense.

Regards,

J


I thinks that's right on the money, cause when I got my bass I probably played in just passive for a few days before even messing with the active, and even than I still really, really dig the tone in Passive, I don't think I've been a fan of passive for a long time, Thanks Fodera=) I'm converted.
 
I like the idea and feel (perceived or otherwise) of the extended B, but I hate the look. It seems to ruin the flawless flow of the rest of the design. Purely IMO of course, as it seems that some dig that look.
 
I like the idea and feel (perceived or otherwise) of the extended B, but I hate the look. It seems to ruin the flawless flow of the rest of the design. Purely IMO of course, as it seems that some dig that look.
I don't wanna' seem harsh, but I agree. Looks REALLY wonky to me, and honestly, I can't imagine the B having any issues whatsoever on the other two designs. The ES5 I played had a superb B string, and it was the median B (2+3... the one I'm getting), and a 34" scale. Needed absolutely no improvement whatsoever... at least IMHO.
 
Looks super wonky to me, too (not that there is a more elegant way to do that, however). But given that the best Fodera B's I've experienced were all older Foderas with regular headstocks and mostly 34" scale, and that the extended B's I've tried were nothing special...I can't do it.

The engineer in me REALLY can't do it, though. I did a couple experiments relating to this (and separately, bridge mass) ~5-6 years back, and found if anything changed, it had to do with the contact patch of the string over the nut changing, and there was some minor differences in the decay constants as a result. The differences were not statistically significant.

But as with most things, if someone digs it, who cares. Variety of life and all that.
 
+1.

But the world would be a very boring place if we all liked the same thing. Every bassist playing a black/maple Precision comes to mind.;)
Well... even if that were the case, there are definitely worse things. Phil rocked the hell out of that format. :)

Phil_Lynott_by_IamElvis.jpg


tumblr_m74ac2KuDW1rvyadto1_400.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.