• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Fodera Club Part XIX

Status
Not open for further replies.
What do you think about this (used) ash Imperial

http://www.fodera.com/Main/NewBornDetails.aspx?FeaturedItemID=266

compared to this walnut Emperor II ?

http://www.fodera.com/Main/NewBornDetails.aspx?FeaturedItemID=589

[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]

[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]


I don't even think you could call that Imperial USED, I talked to the store about that bass, it was my second pick if my olive imperial fell through, To me in the world of exotic basses, that wood combo is like a breath of fresh air.
 
I guess your second Fodera will be ash/maple ;)


2 differents basses...

Maybe you should asking you if you want a 5 or a 6 strings.

Anyway I am sure both are excelent basses.

In Thailande people says :

same-same, but different....
I would adding : but good !

I spend a couples of months wondering should I go ash/maple FB or walnut/ebony FB...

And gone for the walnut/ebony...

The result is I started to think about the spec for a second Fodera....:bawl:
(if Jason find enought patience...:D)
 
This was one of my fav's when I was shopping but I couldn't get the boss to go for it.

Link Removed
 

Attachments

  • 4500 front.jpg
    4500 front.jpg
    38.7 KB · Views: 106
We have done that to one Alembic. In the end it still sounding more Alembic than Fodera. The reality is that the design of Alembics (woods, mass, PUP spacing, PUP's) have as much to do with their tone as the preamp...IMHO, of course.

J

that actually always interested me, if you put Fodera electronics in another bass, how far will it be from actual Fodera.

And all that woods, mass, PUP spacing, have a lot to do with character of the bass.

Man one day I will save all your interesting quotes and put it somewhere for safe keeping... again thanks for sharing all your knowledge and experience!!
 
Nothing is going to change the inherent quality of the design of the Alembic, its woods, pickup spacing and pickups. Mike's rack mount is a GREAT unit, but remember, the underlying sound of an instrument is always there...

J

Thanks for your opinion, I'll just leave it at that. Maybe I'll have to try the rack-mount Pope preamp=)
 
Thanks for the kind words. I really want to reiterate that Joey, Vinny and I all believe that EVERY major aspect of a build makes an important difference in the final tone of an instrument. The choice of woods, the mass of the woods, the pickup spacing, the mass of the bridge, the mass of the tuners, the kind of pickups, the electronics, the thickness of the neck...literally every major decision that is made changes the overall sound of the instrument.

The reality is that the LAST piece of the puzzle is the preamp. Every other decision (many of which cannot be changed) comes before the preamp and if you don't like the sum total of what the instrument sounds like passively, you'll never really love it no matter what preamp / amp combination you go with.

Again, this is our thinking and the way that we approach building. There are many out there that do not believe in this philosophy. That said, I trust what my ears tell me more than anything I read...

I hope that this makes some kind of sense.

Regards,

J

that actually always interested me, if you put Fodera electronics in another bass, how far will it be from actual Fodera.

And all that woods, mass, PUP spacing, have a lot to do with character of the bass.

Man one day I will save all your interesting quotes and put it somewhere for safe keeping... again thanks for sharing all your knowledge and experience!!
 
Thanks for the kind words. I really want to reiterate that Joey, Vinny and I all believe that EVERY major aspect of a build makes an important difference in the final tone of an instrument. The choice of woods, the mass of the woods, the pickup spacing, the mass of the bridge, the mass of the tuners, the kind of pickups, the electronics, the thickness of the neck...literally every major decision that is made changes the overall sound of the instrument.

The reality is that the LAST piece of the puzzle is the preamp. Every other decision (many of which cannot be changed) comes before the preamp and if you don't like the sum total of what the instrument sounds like passively, you'll never really love it no matter what preamp / amp combination you go with.

Again, this is our thinking and the way that we approach building. There are many out there that do not believe in this philosophy. That said, I trust what my ears tell me more than anything I read...

I hope that this makes some kind of sense.

Regards,

J


+ 1 on all that Jason.....
 
Thanks for the kind words. I really want to reiterate that Joey, Vinny and I all believe that EVERY major aspect of a build makes an important difference in the final tone of an instrument. The choice of woods, the mass of the woods, the pickup spacing, the mass of the bridge, the mass of the tuners, the kind of pickups, the electronics, the thickness of the neck...literally every major decision that is made changes the overall sound of the instrument.

The reality is that the LAST piece of the puzzle is the preamp. Every other decision (many of which cannot be changed) comes before the preamp and if you don't like the sum total of what the instrument sounds like passively, you'll never really love it no matter what preamp / amp combination you go with.

Again, this is our thinking and the way that we approach building. There are many out there that do not believe in this philosophy. That said, I trust what my ears tell me more than anything I read...

I hope that this makes some kind of sense.

Regards,

J



That's why there is only one and nothing else come close
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts