16lbs... 200watts all usable great tone.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
The 2-6 is actually the Minimark. I got mine in the mid '00s, been a wonderful amp all these years.V
Also adding that little Vox and maybe a used Micromark 2x6 to the contenders.
Thanks, guys. I looked at the Rumble 100 as well. I really want to stay under 20 pounds with minimal bulk (remember, difficult low back issues). Besides the amp, I'd be lugging an instrument and a cable/misc bag.
Regarding a preamp with the Markbass, both of my axes have active EMG pickups (onboard preamps). Would that cut it, or might I need an additional outboard preamp?
As for the sound of the Rumble, I'm not totally sure I'd like it. Just speculating based on a couple of other Fender combos I've had. Most recently was a 1x10 Fender Bassman 25 from the early 2000s. Kinda hissy but nice tone. And too heavy for my needs now.
I had the same experience with the Rumble 40. By contrast, I found the Ampeg BA110v2 to offer up more balance. I bought the Ampeg. Yes, it's heavier at 34 lbs but it was the superior tone machine, IMHO.I’ve got a Rumble 40 and have used it in situations just like you’re describing. I know a lot of people like them, but for me it’s too muddy. (The problem was never volume.) I now have it in the practice room of my vacation house and clean up the sound with a preamp that I have on hand.
A HUGE advantage to the Markbass amps mentioned here is that you can pop them on top of another cabinet and plug them in. I once did a loud blues gig with the 2x6 on top of my SWR 4x10 Goliath cabinet, with the MB 2x6 powering the whole thing. While it clearly did not have the punchy headroom of one of my 500w heads, it definitely cut the gig. A Rumble cannot do that trick, there is no extension speaker output jack option. So to me, the small MB amps are the clear choice.
Thanks for the offer, but I’m out West! I’ll call GC and ask what’s in stock. According to the website, these small models are not on the floor right now.Are you anywhere near New York State? I have all the amps we've been discussing and would be happy to let you play through them.
This is a good reality check. I have not gigged with any amp in more than a decade because I always play venues with a PA and take just a tuner and a SansAmp BDDI. Now suddenly I have a couple of small gigs lined up with no sound. Fluke or new normal? Hard to tell. Might start cheap with the Rumble and upgrade if/when needed.Take the money saved by choosing the Rum40 over the Mark Bass and put it into no load mutual funds then sit back and watch
Thanks for the offer, but I’m out West! I’ll call GC and ask what’s in stock. According to the website, these small models are not on the floor right now.
This is a good reality check. I have not gigged with any amp in more than a decade because I always play venues with a PA and take just a tuner and a SansAmp BDDI. Now suddenly I have a couple of small gigs lined up with no sound. Fluke or new normal? Hard to tell. Might start cheap with the Rumble and upgrade if/when needed.
I’ve got a Rumble 40 ..... it’s too muddy.
My experience, too. Maybe it's the cab/speaker driver that is at the root of this?I had the same experience with the Rumble 40.
Also, @srayb, just doing a double take on this post. Thanks for the roundup. Very curious about the SB106 after digging up some old threads on it. Love the sleek look, shape, and size. I know you prefer the SB110, but how exactly does the 106 compare with the Micromark? Lacking in highs, but what about for a player who doesn’t care for a horn? And highs aside, what is the overall Traynor Small Block tone like?I’ve played through the Micromark a few times in a store and really liked it. I’ve also had a Traynor SB106, but found it lacking in highs.
I would suggest a Traynor SB110. I liked it better than the Micromark & SB106 (and is also cheaper). It’s a little bigger (14” cubed, 21 lbs) but has a good tweeter (with defeat switch) as well great sounding 10” speaker and can put out 120W. Plus a great warranty and made in Canada.
My goal when I was trying out the SB106 might be a bit different from most people; I was primarily interested in it for quiet small room solo/practicing, which is low volume, but I wanted full-range (as I play 6-string basses). I already have a small Genz Benz Shuttle 3.0-8T combo (8” with tweeter), which I love, so was comparing it to that. That being said, I know a lot of bass players don’t need or want a tweeter, and if that is you, I would say the SB106 is actually fantastic. The low-end on it is pretty amazing, very smooth and strong down to the low B, and the entire range is balanced nicely (which you can further tweak with the EQing section). The unit is very high quality and sturdy (Traynors have always been notorious for being incredibly well-built). The bonus with this combo, is that the amplifier section is basically their SB200H head installed into this little combo, and you have the ability to plug in an external cabinet (which disconnects internal 6.5” speaker) and you have the full 200W @ 4-ohms output. Here’s a pic of both my current Genz Benz and the Traynor side-by-side for comparison. With the SB106 you cannot remove the head section, as I can do with my Genz Benz.Also, @srayb, just doing a double take on this post. Thanks for the roundup. Very curious about the SB106 after digging up some old threads on it. Love the sleek look, shape, and size. I know you prefer the SB110, but how exactly does the 106 compare with the Micromark? Lacking in highs, but what about for a player who doesn’t care for a horn? And highs aside, what is the overall Traynor Small Block tone like?