TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Plus that looks real nice...View attachment 3127852
Oh yeah, i assumed that. And just in the spirit of the scientific method... no difference.

While I'm skeptical of this working with every Fender (I've played/owned some with really dead, dead spots), I could see how this could help in some cases.
I currently don't have a bass with a string tree, but I'm wondering if something similar to a foam mute pad would work on basses with angled head stocks.
The dead spot can be removed only when the neck’s resonance frequency shifts. I don’t see how adding a washer can change the resonance frequency unless it substantially weighs.
You can get a bit of high pitched chirp from the strings on the headstock. But you have to hit the strings hard and it's so high pitched, that it's really not going to come through an amp. But something like a Gruv Gear Fret Wrap behind the nut would kill most of that chirp. If you have a bass with a string tree, then you would need to kill that portion of string too. Gromet washers will fit between the strings and then your headstock is completely silent. But it has nothing to do with dead spots.
Joe- you make a valid point that increasing theWell, here's a question: Is it the dampening factor of the rubber washer, or is it that the thickness of the washer presses the strings more firmly into the nut? The latter makes a bit more sense to me. The firmer the pressure against the nut, the less that anything beyond it influences vibration of the string. I'm not saying this is what is happening, but it seems reasonable, sight unseen.
Ross-Some comedy writes it's self;went to AceIs the hard rubber Fender washer like the rubber strap locks they sell? I’ve had a number of Fender items over the years, but I can’t picture this mystical rubber washer you speak of.
Rich-Even though yours isn't a Fender,if it has aI put grommet washers between all strings on the headstock which killed any and all string vibration. No difference in the dead spot.
Rich-Are you sure there is no string to stringView attachment 3127852
Oh yeah, i assumed that. And just in the spirit of the scientific method... no difference.
It worked for me-just trying to help.Put a rubber washer under your string tree it is a miracle cure for dead spots.![]()
A dead spot is partial phase cancellation from aThe dead spot can be removed only when the neck’s resonance frequency shifts. I don’t see how adding a washer can change the resonance frequency unless it substantially weighs.
IMO this is one of the most classy headstocks on any instrument that I’ve ever seen. Fair enough though!y'know, I'd love those basses if it wasn't for the ugly headstock.
IMO this is one of the most classy headstocks on any instrument that I’ve ever seen. Fair enough though!
I’m thinking that I don’t really have to do any of those things.cataract-Hope thats not literal because you need to look up nodes,anti-nodes,hard and soft end points, standing waves and phase inversion.
I’m a huge fan of the more classic headstock shape as well— personally, I think Fender nailed it with their contours! It’s a shame that the non-angled back headstock opens up the topic that this thread is about but I’m all about function over form in these cases.It's just too blocky for me. I wish he would consider doing custom headstock shapes, or something inline. A few musicians of some of my favorite bands play them, but man... so blocky, lol. To each their own : )
Hi. You must be new here? Welcome to Talkbass.Seems like a ton of negativity toward something so simple and cheap to try.
