I am now GAS free. (I think I may have said that before...) 700RB-II, MB200, 4 ohm 212 MBE-II, 8 ohm NEO 112-II. Can mix and match any way I like.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I've got the same amps (plus a 400RB) but with Neo410s. No GAS either. If I got anything, it'd be another GK, though.![]()
I am now GAS free. (I think I may have said that before...) 700RB-II, MB200, 4 ohm 212 MBE-II, 8 ohm NEO 112-II. Can mix and match any way I like.
The Fusion 550 is more plush and round down low than any other G-K I've tried. The MBF800 won't biamp G-K cabs.?..I like everything about the 550 but the weight. So, I'm thinking about parting ways with F550 and going to the MBF800. Good idea? Bad idea? I'd love a little more power, and a LOT less weight, but I really dig the sound...
This ^^^is my main rig love it...Nice taste VooDoo
The Fusion 550 is more plush and round down low than any other G-K I've tried. The MBF800 won't biamp G-K cabs.
Other than that, IMO, it's all down to what you want and like.
You'll get many here that will say to match cabs. The amp can push these two yes. Is it a recommended combo. No.I'm looking at a GK700RB-II to replace my Crate BT350, I have a 4x10@8 ohm plus a 1x18@8 ohm cabinet I'll be running it through. Will I be OK with that setup?
You'll get many here that will say to match cabs. The amp can push these two yes. Is it a recommended combo. No.
However I have run a combo like this but it was a power amp driven beast with Bag End cabs. I could adjust the output to either cab for a balanced volume without over driving the 18.
Won't make any difference regarding how well the cabs will or won't work together. Those amps sound quite different from each other however. RB is more traditional GK where MB is more modern sounding.Unfortunately I can't change out my cabinets anytime soon. Would I be better off with the MB500?
Which amp you use won't matter.Unfortunately I can't change out my cabinets anytime soon. Would I be better off with the MB500?
Plush and round down low, huh? Are we still talking about amps?
You'd be better off using just the 410. The 700 still provides plenty of power -- and volume -- at 8 ohms.Unfortunately I can't change out my cabinets anytime soon. Would I be better off with the MB500?
I've thought of starting a "dictionary" thread on here for that exact reason! It can cover terms, shorthand abbreviations, give some example of "plush and round" or "pillowy", etc. I think it would help!I think I'll need some sort of bass glossary because I don't know what half of these adjectives mean.
You'd be better off using just the 410. The 700 still provides plenty of power -- and volume -- at 8 ohms.
You'll get many here that will say to match cabs. The amp can push these two yes. Is it a recommended combo. No.
However I have run a combo like this but it was a power amp driven beast with Bag End cabs. I could adjust the output to either cab for a balanced volume without over driving the 18.
I fail to see why my cabinets aren't matched; many bassists run a 4x10 and a 1x15 (though mine is an 18 instead) and they're both 8 ohms.
You'd be better off using just the 410. The 700 still provides plenty of power -- and volume -- at 8 ohms.
You got me there. You're right: Try the cab combo and see. I'm merely suggesting the 410 may be enough.Have you heard his 410+118?
No?
They might work really well together.
They might not either, but to just say out of hand it's a fail is pretty presumptive
And, for me, the 700rbii didn't have enough clean power, so I sold it and got the 1001.