TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
@Jeff Genzler I apologize if this may be a dumb question, but what the benefit of using this for recording over just coming direct out of my MG800 via XLR?
I never thought of that. So in essence, you can make your MG head into a 2 channel head. Interesting. I wish I had more gigs that used an amp as this is a fantastic idea/option.@PaulS
BUT also, if you do have a Magellan amp and you've always wanted a second preamp channel for a different bass in your set-up, then you can run the MG-PRE-PEDAL into the AUX IN of the Magellan 350 or 800 and have a different instrument plugged in there.
Hope this information is helpful.
@PaulS ---- That is a good question. Frankly there would be no difference in recording with the DI out from your MG-800 or the PRE/DI pedal. So if you already have an MG amp and you don't have a need for an even more portable preamp option, then this might not be a product for your needs.
BUT also, if you do have a Magellan amp and you've always wanted a second preamp channel for a different bass in your set-up, then you can run the MG-PRE-PEDAL into the AUX IN of the Magellan 350 or 800 and have a different instrument plugged in there.
Hope this information is helpful.
I never thought of that. So in essence, you can make your MG head into a 2 channel head. Interesting. I wish I had more gigs that used an amp as this is a fantastic idea/option.
Any plans for a V2 head with the filters added? Maybe a Bluetooth Aux in?@PaulS ---- That is a good question. Frankly there would be no difference in recording with the DI out from your MG-800 or the PRE/DI pedal. So if you already have an MG amp and you don't have a need for an even more portable preamp option, then this might not be a product for your needs.
BUT also, if you do have a Magellan amp and you've always wanted a second preamp channel for a different bass in your set-up, then you can run the MG-PRE-PEDAL into the AUX IN of the Magellan 350 or 800 and have a different instrument plugged in there.
Hope this information is helpful.
What would the advantage be of using the AUX IN vs FX LOOP Return? Just curious.@PaulS ---- That is a good question. Frankly there would be no difference in recording with the DI out from your MG-800 or the PRE/DI pedal. So if you already have an MG amp and you don't have a need for an even more portable preamp option, then this might not be a product for your needs.
BUT also, if you do have a Magellan amp and you've always wanted a second preamp channel for a different bass in your set-up, then you can run the MG-PRE-PEDAL into the AUX IN of the Magellan 350 or 800 and have a different instrument plugged in there.
Hope this information is helpful.
The ability to use the preamp as a second channel along with the amp’s main preamp… more common in dual pick-up setups (esp. mag + piezo, mag + mic or piezo + mic)What would the advantage be of using the AUX IN vs FX LOOP Return? Just curious.
This would be a nice way to implement Rick-O-Sound.The ability to use the preamp as a second channel along with the amp’s main preamp… more common in dual pick-up setups (esp. mag + piezo, mag + mic or piezo + mic)
Correct, and with a second preamp on the second channel into the aux, taking a DI from the second channel keeps the two signals separate all the way to the console.This would be a nice way to implement Rick-O-Sound.
No it does not.Does the headphone output have a sort of cabinet emulation?