• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Genzler Amplification Club

I was never was a tube guy with bass amps. I remember when the Streamliner came out and Jeff said to me “it’s probably not something you’re interested in” cuz he knew what I liked. I had the ShuttleMAX 12.0 at the time. Years later, he told me about the Kinetix 800 and shipped one to me. It changed everything about my feelings with tubes. I use the Kinetix live and the Magellan lives in our practice studio. There’s just something that the Kinetix brings on stage that I didn’t know I needed. I can’t say enough about how great that amp is. My second fav is the Magellan 800+‼️😎
 
I owned a couple of Streamliner 900's and did not care for them. They were too....woolly? sounding for my taste. I now have the Kinetix and am knocked out by the great tone that is there without my having to turn knobs for a while to get there. It will approach the fatness of the Streamliner but still retains more clarity.

I smile every time I play through my Kinetix. Fat, warm, clear and very powerful amp. It is crazy good!
 
I need to try one through my (RevSound 112) cabinet with my bass. it does seem to tick all the boxes. not cheap tho! I'm planning to sell my Quilter 803 regardless. it doesn't "move me".

I've played the Kinetics 800 through RevSound 212 and RS28V cabs. Both sounded terrific!
 
I owned a couple of Streamliner 900's and did not care for them. They were too....woolly? sounding for my taste. I now have the Kinetix and am knocked out by the great tone that is there without my having to turn knobs for a while to get there. It will approach the fatness of the Streamliner but still retains more clarity.

I smile every time I play through my Kinetix. Fat, warm, clear and very powerful amp. It is crazy good!
+1 :thumbsup:
 
Play through one and you will “need” it.
Oh, I have. Kinetix into a Magellan 2x10 I think. Super nice although I think I prefer a 12" cab.
I feel ya. I can't "reasonably" justify it to myself, because I'm happy with everything else.
My MG350/12T-V is all I ever seem to need. I play in a jazz quartet and I only run my gain at 11 o'clock and my master at like 9 o'clock. And the one hand grab is so nice. And it sounds great.
 
Since falling for the Genzler Magellan and Kinetics amps hook, line and sinker, I've had to deal with a side issue, which is having cabs (I love) that are high sensitivity and relatively low wattage capacity for the amps' 800 watts of juice. I thought I could manage through this by closely monitoring the preamp/master volume intensities but finally decide to give in and get higher-rated cabs and avoid blowing drivers.

Since weight is a major issue, I first went for a Magellan ULV-212T and have been thoroughly satisfied with that move. After waffling on whether to replace a beloved 208 cab, I finally decided to try the Magellan ULV-112T. It arrived yesterday. I was surprised by the small and compact size (not to mention the 19.5 pound weight). Built like a tank. Looks great. And so easy to move! After breaking it in for 4-5 hours with a solid dose of Duck Dunn basslines, I cycled through all my basses and the two amps. There is no physical way a 112 can match the girth and presence of a 212, and this was true for the 112T. However, I was pleasantly surprised to capture some of the larger cab's presence with a small boost of the bass EQ. In cycling through my basses and amps, the 112T clearly reflected unique characteristics of each configuration. What you put in is what you get. Equally important is tone: the 112T sounds exactly like the 212T, which makes using either cab more predictable.

The most useful discovery was performance of the 112T in my music room, which is a sound treated bedroom with 11 foot ceiling. The 212T, while sounding great in that room, also was overpowering the room with its presence in a band setting -- even at lower volume. I guess it was due to the large volume of air being moved by the dual driver cab? In contrast, the single driver 112T creates bass in perfect balance with the small room's acoustics. Super happy with this practical discovery--especially for acoustic recording!

The other benefit is I can use both cabs together as a stack thanks to both amps' support of 2.67 ohms. I couldn't run a stack before 'cause my old 208 was 4 ohms; so is the 212T.

The first photo is of the 212/112 stack. I can't imagine "needing" a full stack but if my imagination proves wrong, my gear will be ready for action! The second photo is the 112T in its new daily position. As usual, Jeff Genzler provided terrific, speedy help in answering my questions. Thanks Jeff and the whole Genzler crew for such amazing gear!

Genzler Magellan-ULV-212 and 112 stack.jpeg


Genzler Magellan-ULV-112T.jpeg
 
Since falling for the Genzler Magellan and Kinetics amps hook, line and sinker, I've had to deal with a side issue, which is having cabs (I love) that are high sensitivity and relatively low wattage capacity for the amps' 800 watts of juice. I thought I could manage through this by closely monitoring the preamp/master volume intensities but finally decide to give in and get higher-rated cabs and avoid blowing drivers.

Since weight is a major issue, I first went for a Magellan ULV-212T and have been thoroughly satisfied with that move. After waffling on whether to replace a beloved 208 cab, I finally decided to try the Magellan ULV-112T. It arrived yesterday. I was surprised by the small and compact size (not to mention the 19.5 pound weight). Built like a tank. Looks great. And so easy to move! After breaking it in for 4-5 hours with a solid dose of Duck Dunn basslines, I cycled through all my basses and the two amps. There is no physical way a 112 can match the girth and presence of a 212, and this was true for the 112T. However, I was pleasantly surprised to capture some of the larger cab's presence with a small boost of the bass EQ. In cycling through my basses and amps, the 112T clearly reflected unique characteristics of each configuration. What you put in is what you get. Equally important is tone: the 112T sounds exactly like the 212T, which makes using either cab more predictable.

The most useful discovery was performance of the 112T in my music room, which is a sound treated bedroom with 11 foot ceiling. The 212T, while sounding great in that room, also was overpowering the room with its presence in a band setting -- even at lower volume. I guess it was due to the large volume of air being moved by the dual driver cab? In contrast, the single driver 112T creates bass in perfect balance with the small room's acoustics. Super happy with this practical discovery--especially for acoustic recording!

The other benefit is I can use both cabs together as a stack thanks to both amps' support of 2.67 ohms. I couldn't run a stack before 'cause my old 208 was 4 ohms; so is the 212T.

The first photo is of the 212/112 stack. I can't imagine "needing" a full stack but if my imagination proves wrong, my gear will be ready for action! The second photo is the 112T in its new daily position. As usual, Jeff Genzler provided terrific, speedy help in answering my questions. Thanks Jeff and the whole Genzler crew for such amazing gear!

View attachment 7471480

View attachment 7471481
Such a fine modular rig. I've noticed the same thing, that a 212 in my 11' x 20' practice room overwhelms while my 115 is perfect.