• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Get off my LAWN! "Grumpy Old Farts"

Status
Not open for further replies.
Thanks to @Bob Clayton for taking the time and effort to clean and reopen this thread. As a reminder to everyone, if someone opens a door to politics, disrespect, or any other rabbit hole that is contrary to site rules, please report the post rather than walking through the same door in reply to it, even if that reply is attempting to contradict or correct it.

Every quote of a rule breaking post draws more attention to it, invites more replies, and makes more work for the moderators. Thanks in advance.
+1:thumbsup:
 
To what? A large cinder?
I think if it happens it will be more like the Earth depicted in WALL-E. Not nuked to cinders but covered in trash and way too much crud in the water and air. Not that cinderation couldn't happen, but we as a society are more likely to die a death of 1000 or 1000000 or 1000000000 cuts....
 
The worst I’ve heard in the “too many notes club” is Al Di Meola on guitar. I totally get that playing 64th notes on a fast song shows off some skills, but I would rather hear an interpretation of the melody that is fresh, interesting, and not completely based on speed. They live in different worlds, but that is why I prefer Santana’s solos to those offered by Al Di Meola.
While I'm 'aware' that any note can be played against any chord, it doesn't always make for a 'good' sound. Playing 64th notes at Tempo di Tearass may be flashy, and at least some of the notes may fit or be 'right', I'm not that impressed for long.
 
Last edited:
I imagine that people that worked at the paper would bring in their personal film for processing.

Reporters with cameras are notoriously sloppy photographers :meh: A lot of darkroom rescue work takes place to salvage a photo, and certainly Been There. Not my full time job, tho.
 
…deposit a turd in everyone else's soup…

With that image in mind, I’ve gone off eating soup. :laugh:

The thread has been cleaned ….

Thank you for all your work and allowing the thread to be reopened.

My wife was a chamber maid in a hotel and knows what it’s like to clean up other people’s messes. Not something you want to do but well appreciated.

9D871258-7D12-4EBA-A41B-BA1A2B0B83DE.jpeg
 
My 'bitter half', who isn't musically trained, refers to solos like the alto solo here as "running scales". Even though I get what's being played, to some degree I wonder if they're being paid by the note.

On a fast bebop tune, I request in advance to be paid by the note. Nothing like playing that for several soloists and 6-7 mins then someone says "bass solo!". No, but thanks asking. :laugh:
 
On a fast bebop tune, I request in advance to be paid by the note. Nothing like playing that for several soloists and 6-7 mins then someone says "bass solo!". No, but thanks asking. :laugh:
Realistically, you're playing a solo throughout the tune. But it would give everyone-band and audience alike-a chance to chat.;)
 
First couple of mins were pretty cool and I liked the groove but 6 mins of that was a little too much.
The BL/arranger of one of the big bands I was a part of almost always put in a section where the entire band played in unison.
That's 6 saxes(including BL), 4 'bones, 4 trumpets, piano, drums, and bass, all playing the same notes/rhythm. Other musicians thought it was "cool", crowd was unimpressed. Me too. I s'pose it's a jazz thing I don't understand-or something.:eyebrow:
 
:laugh:

That's a running gag in the school combo. I usually give the others a topic to discuss while I'm playing. I may have posted this about 35,000 posts ago. Some self deprecating humor.
View attachment 4337150
Yeah, I was told a story by a sax player friend(?)of mine. "Everyone talks during the bass solo" being the punchline.
 
The BL/arranger of one of the big bands I was a part of almost always put in a section where the entire band played in unison.
That's 6 saxes(including BL), 4 'bones, 4 trumpets, piano, drums, and bass, all playing the same notes/rhythm. Other musicians thought it was "cool", crowd was unimpressed. Me too. I s'pose it's a jazz thing I don't understand-or something.:eyebrow:
BTW, I'm not saying "I'm right". I'm saying I don't see the point and it's not something I wanna hear. One chorus in a 45 minute set is(more than)enuff...For me.
 
But one can't really argue with the ease and quality of digital photography; what a pleasure it is now to be able to take almost unlimited shots of a subject until you get that very special right one!
Sadly, that's sort of killed the real art and skill/knowledge of the process of photography.
I imagine that people that worked at the paper would bring in their personal film for processing.
A friend of mine was a nwsppr photographer. Each photographer at the nwsppr he worked at had their own darkroom. I've spent plenty of time in Rick's back in the day.

A lot of darkroom rescue work takes place to salvage a photo, and certainly Been There.
BTDT way more times that I should have at the lab. My goal was to make everyone look like Ansel Adams, Weegee, Bresson, et al. The trash can was the most important tool I had in the darkroom...
First couple of mins were pretty cool and I liked the groove but 6 mins of that was a little too much.
To each their own; I happen to like TT.
 
Sadly, that's sort of killed the real art and skill/knowledge of the process of photography.

No, I don't think so... It's just changed. In the past the pros showed up with 4 or 5 rangefinder and/or SLR 35mm cameras hanging from them and with a few dozen rolls of film in their bags. They might shoot hundreds of shots of a given event or subject! And then the heavy duty artwork in, say, the Life Magazine studios, came in the selective editing the skilled photo editors did in their workshops. Thinking every great shot was taken at the first and only press of the shutter was one of the great myths surrounding pro photography! Yes of course some great shots were, but this was mostly a matter of great good luck combined with some rare skills not many possessed...
So IMO digital photography is now actually expanding the art in some ways by allowing more folks to become their own skillful editors... Now you can simply delete your own mistakes and imperfect shots rather than having another editor (with different opinions and tastes?) crumpling them into the wastebasket! :laugh:
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.