• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Getting big fat thud tones in big resonant rooms

Apr 11, 2005
127,257
125,180
Plymouth NC
Disclosures
Endorsing: Yamaha, Ampeg, Line 6, EMG
I'll keep it brief (EDIT: I tried but failed)...I grew up in an era where bass players were exploring more and more what treble can do, and while I enjoyed a lot of bassists who had dark sounds, I wanted treble, dang nab it! Never tweeter frequencies, but good brightness that made it obvious I was using a pick. And I've gone through all the ups and downs of tone that different bass players used over the years and a lot of knob twisting and setting them at noon ll kinds of crap and nonsense.

But my first pro band was with an Elvis impersonator, and he absolutely insisted that I turn my bass up all the way and turn treble and mids all the way down unless we were in a large theater, at which point he gave into soundman complaints. So naturally I hated him for it :D and resisted it for a long long time. But over the years, I started to see the appeal in those darker tones and started gradually cutting back on the treble, especially if it wasn't a straight up 80's rock gig, and now I'm full-on in love with them for a whole lot of things I'm doing. Not so easy to make those kinds of sounds pop in a room full of low end resonances and blasting it through big PA's.

But if you're playing rooms that are really resonant with low mids and bass response and you want dark tones, it's really not a bad idea for you to send a relatively flat signal to the PA and discuss your objectives with the sound tech. They do need you to give them mids and treble because of possible mud buildup that causes you to have no tone at all. IMHO they don't need tweeter or big fat hip hop low end frequencies, so with me they never get them :D but you do have to use your ears and know when something's a mistake. I love thud, but the most important thing when getting awesome thud tones in a bigger and more resonant room without mud involves not turning treble and mids so low the sound tech can't use them. Some think I micromanage my PA sound but I'm very conscious of that.

Over the past few years I've had the privilege of working with and getting to know the great Steve Boone, from the 60's folk rock band The Lovin' Spoonful. The Spoonful pretty much wrote the book on that style of music, had a butt-ton of major hits, many of which Steve wrote or co-wrote, and to this day Steve brings the thud in any room I've ever heard him play and on any supplied backline he's ever used, including a pretty wide variety of my amps. He started out playing a Guild Starfire and a Precision with flats into a B-15 in their earliest days, but since I've known him and before, he's been using an Ibanez BTB active neck-thru 4 with rounds that usually somewhat used but sounded pretty lively to me while he's playing unplugged. But you can drop him into any room across the world no matter how big or small, and his sound always has a massive low end with just enough clarity so you can make out his notes. And he's done it on a handful of my basses that don't sound like his. Flats, rounds, passive or active, it comes across. And that's his entire tonal goal and always has been with the Spoonful...put out a big warm low end that doesn't sound clanky but always clear enough to tell what notes he's playing.

And here's his secret...Steve Boone. That's just how he plays. He doesn't micromanage his sound much at all. I suppose he has some pet settings that he likes, but he gives the house a direct full range sound and will literally plug into anything you give him, and just plays like he does and has since day one. And I've heard a goodly amount of treble and mids coming out of some of the systems he plugs into, and yet, no matter what bass, amp, or PA he uses, it's this big beautiful low end with tonal clarity like I've never heard from anyone else, and it's 100% consistent and easily duplicated. He just plays in a way that lends his sound to it and lets the amp and sound techs (they don't usually bring their own, at least not on the gigs I've done with them) do what they will.

And now I'm playing in a couple bands where my goal is to get the same basic thing happening, and I believe I get a terrific sound when I want a similar vibe happening. But it's never quite like Steve's. Nobody's is. I do my best, but I play like me and I'll never fully cop his sound because of that. And that's OK. Before anything else, tone is always from the musician. But if there's one thing I've learned from working with him (and there's plenty more besides that), the way you cop a great big fat wall of thud and still achieve clarity without clank in any really resonant room for bass is to play like you want it really bad, give the sound tech enough tools to deal with translating it in the house, and the rest falls into place. But playing like you want it really bad is key and it'll never happen otherwise.
 
IME, the active bass is the key. With my Ibanez Musician active 3 band eq and dead half rounds, I can beat any rig into submission. A few tweaks and adjust it to the what you hear in your head. Might work for you.:thumbsup:
Sorry Stumbo, but he can do that with any bass active or passive, and I have actives too and can't achieve what he achieves. I've heard him do it many times right before my eyes...er...ears. He prefers his Ibanez these days but he'll do it on anything.
 
Hi Jimmy :)

an Elvis impersonator, and he absolutely insisted that I turn my bass up all the way

:D

Before anything else, tone is always from the musician

Yep! You can only amplify what you actually create. Only the right technic translates into the right sound. IME

to play like you want it really bad, give the sound tech enough tools to deal with translating it in the house, and the rest falls into place.

Amen to that!

I rather change my sounds by using different right hand positions and technics

than by fiddling too much on the amp (e.g. changing gain too much is a big no go!)

I use post eq or microphone on nearly all of my gigs to give a good workable sound to FOH.

My sound fits in my "sonic space" in the band. (my job!)

The sound tech makes it fit in the room. (his job!)

playing like you want it really bad is key and it'll never happen otherwise.

I sung my song to Mr Jimmy :D

You can' t always get what you want,

but if you try sometime you find

You get what you need!


Ooops that 's not Elvis... :laugh:


greetings

Wise(b)ass
 
I gave up on processing my live sound long ago. (My) reality is, any sound guy works best when given untied hands. I don't even make suggestions. I have learned that most of then know only one formula to solve band sound, and suggestions and directions move them out their comfort zone and just make a mess. In the end, only thing that counts is how band as whole sounds.
I also gave up on EQing and compressing my signal before sending it to mix. It just makes it harder for a sound guy to work. He knows his room, and if he doesn't there's no help. Pushing him only increases pressure, and there are more important things to get done during sound check.
So, I ALWAYS send my clean unaltered bass guitar signal via DI. I play passive AVRI '75 Jazz with deadish roundwounds, and every sound variation comes with my hands. Signal is semi-bright and well defined and, band mates tell me, always sounds great in PA. Genre is soul, drumms+guitar+keys+voxs, most of time also with sax, trombone, trumpet.
My advice to every working bass player, except stars that show revolves around, is to take it easy, simplify things and focus on playing tight.
 
So you conclude that it’s all in his hands.

Plucking technique is important. Pick or fingers, dig in or light touch. Does Steve use a mute, sponge at bridge or palm. All contribute.

I naturally do this thing where I pick and mute with the fleshy part of my thumb. Very light muting but it suppresses the highs. Of course the amp has to play a roll, but that can be dial in as desired.

Finger picking James Jamerson used a sponge mute to get his thud, he really dug in and had the action set high like on a standup bass.

966705A6-F8D2-410A-B0E0-F54EEA307689.jpeg
 
I gave up on processing my live sound long ago. (My) reality is, any sound guy works best when given untied hands. I don't even make suggestions. I have learned that most of then know only one formula to solve band sound, and suggestions and directions move them out their comfort zone and just make a mess. In the end, only thing that counts is how band as whole sounds.
I also gave up on EQing and compressing my signal before sending it to mix. It just makes it harder for a sound guy to work. He knows his room, and if he doesn't there's no help. Pushing him only increases pressure, and there are more important things to get done during sound check.
So, I ALWAYS send my clean unaltered bass guitar signal via DI. I play passive AVRI '75 Jazz with deadish roundwounds, and every sound variation comes with my hands. Signal is semi-bright and well defined and, band mates tell me, always sounds great in PA. Genre is soul, drumms+guitar+keys+voxs, most of time also with sax, trombone, trumpet.
My advice to every working bass player, except stars that show revolves around, is to take it easy, simplify things and focus on playing tight.

I can't argue with what your saying. It's all true except for one thing. Back in the day I was a very well known sound guy, and I was usually the one with the heat.
 
Talent and technique is obviously important to create a specific sound but finger anatomy matters too. I can thump like the best with my middle finger but my index finger creates a much brighter tone unless I play VERY carefully. If I need real old school thud I can only use my middle finger. Which is what Jamerson did anyway, lol.

Different bass players have different fingers and this matters more than most people realise. If anyone in my band picks up my bass when I'm in the next room I can instantly hear who it is, not based on what they play but on their tone. Some have "brighter" fingers than others.

This only applies to fingerstyle of course. With pick style I don't think it matters at all.
 
Very good post and interesting to hear about Boone. I'd agree that the major part of producing tone is "in the hands." I'd just add that I think it helps to not have too much low end coming out of the amp or FOH, which is sometimes a challenge in a sub-happy world. That seems counterintuitive if you want a dark sound, but you still need definition.
 
Talent and technique is obviously important to create a specific sound but finger anatomy matters too. I can thump like the best with my middle finger but my index finger creates a much brighter tone unless I play VERY carefully. If I need real old school thud I can only use my middle finger. Which is what Jamerson did anyway, lol.

Different bass players have different fingers and this matters more than most people realise. If anyone in my band picks up my bass when I'm in the next room I can instantly hear who it is, not based on what they play but on their tone. Some have "brighter" fingers than others.

This only applies to fingerstyle of course. With pick style I don't think it matters at all.
I think you mean index finger as far as Jamerson is concerned. In this pic, you can clearly see the three fingers anchored, and the index finger the actual one plucking.
JAMERSON-GettyImages.png
 
I agree that personal technique is a big piece of the equation. For me, it comes down to two things.

The first is attack. I think it needs to be a distinct attack. I usually finger pick, but it is a firm attack. I use a pick on songs where the song needs it or the rhythm fits a pick better. I generally use little to no compression. If you do compress, make sure that it the attack parameter is adjusted so that the attack doesn't get squashed.

An interesting sidelight. I have a Line6 Variax 705 modelling bass. It is a cool piece of kit, but one thing keeps me from using it very much. It has no attack. I assume it has to do with the modelling algorithm or some compression it does internally. Every time I play it, and then switch back to any of my other basses, I get this feeling of, "Wow, I really missed the attack that was not there on the Variax." I've tried different strings, but nothing brings an attack.

Just as important (or maybe more) is your release. In my view, legato is your enemy. I instinctively end notes by lifting my fretting finger before hitting the next note. Lift just enough to mute or choke the note off. Another thing I do is end a note just as the snare drum hits, giving plenty of space for the snare. I understand that some sound guys put a gate on the bass channel, driven by the snare channel. I prefer to do the mute myself. It's part of my groove.

I think these techniques really make a difference, especially in a boomy and reverberant space. I know a bassist in a local dance-oriented band that insists on playing with "his sound". His sound is picked, highly compressed, kind of clanky and has no space between notes. In every band I've heard him in, the low end in the room just turns to a loud, indistinct mush.

Those are my thoughts. YMMV.
 
Just as important (or maybe more) is your release. In my view, legato is your enemy. I instinctively end notes by lifting my fretting finger before hitting the next note..

Totally agree. A lightbulb went off for me when I read an interview with Nathan East where he said, and I'm paraphrasing, that how you release the note is just as important as how you start it.
 
I think you mean index finger as far as Jamerson is concerned. In this pic, you can clearly see the three fingers anchored, and the index finger the actual one plucking.

In the Motown documentary that came out on Showtime recently there is some brief footage of Jamerson playing. It demonstrates clearly that he uses only the index finger, and it looks like he rakes it back and forth to execute faster passages.