There are a couple of separate, though related topics in play in this thread.
I owned and gigged several of the pre-Gibson Signature 5’s, including the one @spade2you showed
https://www.talkbass.com/threads/gibson-is-bringing-back-tobias-basses.1666441/#post-28888748
…or it’s identical twin. Here is the last one I had:
Every one of those had some issue that did not work for me. I finally sold the one above and commissioned Mike to build this one, which almost hits every one of my prefs.
Meanwhile, I acquired this Nashville era 6 string used around 2003; and after a certain amount of corrective improvement by Pat Wilkins, it is now the finest 6 string I’ve ever been privileged to play. It will go to the grave with me.
Point being that Gibson actually has produced some fine instruments using Mike’s original designs. I understand the antipathy towards Gibson for the way the deal with Mike went down; and I’m not saying that wasn’t a problem. At the same time, it is false to say that Gibson was incapable of producing nice instruments with the designs they purchased. I’m not a proponent of Gibson any more than I’m a proponent of Fender. But, a good bass is a good bass. Perfectly fine for players to make choices based on whatever logic they choose. At the same time, it is false to generalize that Gibson didn’t produce any decent instruments. Hope that makes sense.
I owned and gigged several of the pre-Gibson Signature 5’s, including the one @spade2you showed
https://www.talkbass.com/threads/gibson-is-bringing-back-tobias-basses.1666441/#post-28888748
…or it’s identical twin. Here is the last one I had:
Every one of those had some issue that did not work for me. I finally sold the one above and commissioned Mike to build this one, which almost hits every one of my prefs.
Meanwhile, I acquired this Nashville era 6 string used around 2003; and after a certain amount of corrective improvement by Pat Wilkins, it is now the finest 6 string I’ve ever been privileged to play. It will go to the grave with me.
Point being that Gibson actually has produced some fine instruments using Mike’s original designs. I understand the antipathy towards Gibson for the way the deal with Mike went down; and I’m not saying that wasn’t a problem. At the same time, it is false to say that Gibson was incapable of producing nice instruments with the designs they purchased. I’m not a proponent of Gibson any more than I’m a proponent of Fender. But, a good bass is a good bass. Perfectly fine for players to make choices based on whatever logic they choose. At the same time, it is false to generalize that Gibson didn’t produce any decent instruments. Hope that makes sense.
