• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Gibson is bringing back Tobias basses...

There are a couple of separate, though related topics in play in this thread.

I owned and gigged several of the pre-Gibson Signature 5’s, including the one @spade2you showed
https://www.talkbass.com/threads/gibson-is-bringing-back-tobias-basses.1666441/#post-28888748
…or it’s identical twin. Here is the last one I had:

IMG_0199.jpeg


Every one of those had some issue that did not work for me. I finally sold the one above and commissioned Mike to build this one, which almost hits every one of my prefs.

IMG_0300.jpeg


Meanwhile, I acquired this Nashville era 6 string used around 2003; and after a certain amount of corrective improvement by Pat Wilkins, it is now the finest 6 string I’ve ever been privileged to play. It will go to the grave with me.

IMG_0284.jpeg


Point being that Gibson actually has produced some fine instruments using Mike’s original designs. I understand the antipathy towards Gibson for the way the deal with Mike went down; and I’m not saying that wasn’t a problem. At the same time, it is false to say that Gibson was incapable of producing nice instruments with the designs they purchased. I’m not a proponent of Gibson any more than I’m a proponent of Fender. But, a good bass is a good bass. Perfectly fine for players to make choices based on whatever logic they choose. At the same time, it is false to generalize that Gibson didn’t produce any decent instruments. Hope that makes sense.
 
Looks like a ripoff of an Ibby BTB... :eyebrow:
That was my first thought the moment I saw it. They “Ibanezed” it.
That's a pretty thick top and similar to pre Gibson Tobias that had laminate tops.
See my avatar. Both functional and aesthetically pleasing, in that it highlights the craftsmanship of the build and materials in the body lam.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bucephylus
I like that look
The "top doesn't quite cover the body" look always reminded me of cheap 90's cars, where the manufacturers couldn't figure out how to make the doors open without hitting the body-side cladding.

So, instead of putting money, time, and intellectual expertise into the design to keep that from happening, they just put a big dent in the cladding from the factory and hoped no one would notice or care. It always looked like excrement as well:

20250126_061233.jpg


20250126_061248.jpg


Laughable fail. Again.
 
I think they look great, and I look forward to trying one. That was a great line, and I was sorry to see it discontinued in the first place. I especially miss the Growler 5. (*)

Not for nothing, but this is a different day and a different Gibson than the organization running things in Nashville in the 90's. I get the Talkbass hivemind out-of-hand dismissal of anything Gibson related. I don't care.
 
Last edited:
It's a bit much to word something outside of your personal preference as a laughable fail, particularly when looking at the market shows that a lot of high-dollar basses made by companies with a track record of delivering high-quality instruments for decades continue to sell instruments built this way.

A small example of companies that produce instruments that use laminate top woods that reveal the other body wood due to contouring of the instruments edges:

Fodera
Ritter
Alembic
Dingwall
Ernie Ball
 
So all this angst over the little place where the arm contour goes into the substrate beneath the top veneer?

Nothing about how it plays, how it sounds, how it feels in the hands?

I think there are some people who need to consider what it's like in the real world that something like 99% of the world inhabits, where having an electric bass that works is in itself tremendously exciting; not to mention that having ELECTRICITY to run it is in itself quite a step up.
 
Anybody knows if they are bringing back the Tobias Signature model? The one with a wenge neck and Purple Heart neck ?

Did all the original Signature models have that wood combination for their necks? I was (perhaps mistakenly) under the impression that the original Signatures, Classics, and Basics were all customizeable with any variety of wood combinations.
 
Did all the original Signature models have that wood combination for their necks? I was (perhaps mistakenly) under the impression that the original Signatures, Classics, and Basics were all customizeable with any variety of wood combinations.
No ! Some had other wood combos ; and some even had a top and back laminates (5 piece bodies), BUT the typical signature models had the 9 piece wenge and Purple Heart necks with either zebrawood , Bubinga or lacewood 3 piece bodies with a middle wenge tone plate in the body . This is my 5 string signature :

IMG_1364.png
IMG_1363.png
 
Did all the original Signature models have that wood combination for their necks? I was (perhaps mistakenly) under the impression that the original Signatures, Classics, and Basics were all customizeable with any variety of wood combinations.
The basics had solid wings only ! Either maple , Koa , alder , walnut , zebrawood , lacewood , ash or Bubinga .

The classics were above the basics and were the most common models . Usually with a walnut or alder back and an exotic top (Goncalo Alves was a great wood they used ! ); Purple Heart was another nice option . The necks were 7 piece usually made of maple and Purple Heart or walnut; sometimes the necks were made of walnut with Purple Heart laminates.

And the signatures were already described in my previous post. The signatures are the most RARE and expensive ones . They sound great ! But usually all of them had a great tone ! The basics were great basses too !
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bob_Ross

Latest posts