• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Gibson Studio Thunderbird 5-string Review

Hey guys, here's a review of the aforementioned bass. It's also in another thread, but I figured I'd also post it here to allow people to put their own experiences with it.

I actually own the T-Bird 5......for tonight, the thing goes back tomorrow. And here are the reasons why. For the truly curious, here is what I ran it through: Eden WT-800, Eden 210XLT, SWR Big Ben, Monster Bass Cable, I play fingers only. No lack of bottom ability from the rig :).

1. Finish, finish, finish: You keep hearing it, and it's still true, especially here in Canada. You think you've got finish issues in the States? Try coming to Canada, I work at L&M in Calgary and see every Gibson that comes in, so sad. They say Canada gets the seconds, and it's true.

2. Technical Issues: Does anyone at Gibson really check out these instruments before they go out the door? My inspection card has a straight line through all the check boxes, no individual checks. This would indicate to me that one guy just looked at it, briefly, and ran his pen through it.

I removed the pickups to try and fix a slant issue (bridge PU was leaning backwards), and lo and behold, the area where the adjustment screws go into the body was cracked in half, on both sides, on both pickups. Pre-drilling? Who knows if they even did it.

The truss rod. What a nightmare. First of all, hard to adjust as it was so close to the headstock wood. Secondly, the truss rod when well adjusted rattles like a loose tuning head. So annoying, and not easily fixed. Again, no attention to the most basic elements of setup.

3. Sound: I have to admit, G through E were nice and warm, if a bit muddy, which was also not helped by the inability to set the neck without truss rod rattle. The ceramic humbuckers are pretty nice, at least for those strings. The B, on the other hand, had the weakest sound I've heard in a while. The balance was completly out, and no matter what I tried I couldn't make it sound good.

Here's an example: While playing a simple open B power chord (B,F#,B) I could hardly hear the low B, the E had great tone, as did the B. But what's the point of a 5 string? Low B of course.

So, a bad example, or a bad bass in general? I don't really know, although with pickups being a problem it could easily be the whole line that has issues.

I'm gonna try that Ibanez BTB Prestige 1205 I passed up to get this bass. Hopefully that one will grab me and not let go.
 
Bassjunior said:
I'm gonna try that Ibanez BTB Prestige 1205 I passed up to get this bass. Hopefully that one will grab me and not let go.

Firstly, excellent review, Bassjunior, I've been wondering how those 5 string T-birds were since I first saw them at Musiciansfriend. Maybe you got a lemon, but I've heard other stories of Gibson's quality control getting worse in the past few years.

Secondly, BUY THAT IBANEZ BTB 1205 !!!

I just bought one in January; in fact it's 3 months old today, and let me just say that it is a beautiful instrument looks-wise, sounds great and the workmanship is top-notch!
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]

I'm so happy with mine. I haven't posted a review yet, but will probably do so soon.

If you have any questions about this bass, feel free to ask them here, or PM me.

Believe me, you won't be disappointed if you buy one of these!

Mike ;)
 
There's nothing wrong – both technically and sound-wise – with my (recently purchased) T'bird Studio, then again I have a 4, not the 5. I had it set up by the shop I bought it from and it plays very well and sounds awesome, very balanced. Typical Gibson sound, I love it.

The finish is so-so, yes, but I expected that and honestly, I couldn't care less.
 
I bought my 2005 Gibson Les Paul Standard bass in cherry sunburst sight unseen from Music 123, & of all the problems you have, mine is just the opposite. The finish is perfect, frets dressed very smooth, I cannot think of a more beautiful instrument made.
The only problem it had was a very annoying humming sound, depending where in the room I played it. After further investigation, it turned out to be a light dimmer switch in the dining room that was the culprit. The LP bass has a lot hotter pups than my Fender Jazz, which only slightly picked up the noise from the dimmer.
As far as Gibson QC, I have bought maybe 10 electric, acoustic, & basses for myself & my children, & NOT 1 has any of these QC issues the Gibson bashers keep raising. Maybe not hanging on a rack in GC for a couple months has something to do with it.

"1. Finish, finish, finish: You keep hearing it, and it's still true, especially here in Canada. You think you've got finish issues in the States? Try coming to Canada, I work at L&M in Calgary and see every Gibson that comes in, so sad. They say Canada gets the seconds, and it's true."

OK, anyone can say the finish sucks, but what sucks about it? How about some specific examples. Overspray? Color not even? What my friend?

The pup issue you have might just be an isolated one, mine are fine, as I recall, the same ones that are on the T-Bird. Being only a 4 string, the Les Paul does not have the 5th string to deal with, but a lot of 34 sacle 5 stringers seem to be a bit lacking in the low B dept. My Fender American Jazz V is OK, but I've played 35 basses that had a lot more defined B.

I'm sorry your T-Bird was not what you expected, but I am happy with my LP & will keep it for as long as........