• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

GK 800RB vs GK 400RB vs 1001rbii

For anyone who has owned, gigged and has experience with these amps, which would you choose and why? I use a gk400rb weekly at one of my practice spaces with a single 15 classic ampeg cab and I really like the tone I get. Its not the same than when I used to gig mesa 400+ or svt classic but it still sounds great. I owned a 1001rbii for about a year and a half and remember it sounded too modern for my taste. I have played with a 800rb and dont remember much about it. My cabs are ampeg 410 heritage, and mesa powerhouse 1000. I currently have a acoustic 370 and 150b, svt classic. I'm looking to switch up the acoustics for the gks...

Thoughts?
 
The "modern" with the 1001RB II comes from the manual's suggestion of running the master high and the "Volume" (eq pre gain) for loudness. Running the "volume" just under distortion and the master (and boost for harmonics) for loudness brings out a whole new animal.

The 800RB is a classic, punchy amp and the separate 100 watt amp can be used for a drummer's monitor or Biamp. It does have a steep HPF so it does not have the low stage rumble the 400RB's will give.

You already know some of the 400RB's capabilities.
 
My favorites are basically listed in order in your OP.

800- loud, powerful, and punch without the rumble.

Old 400- like an 800 but less power and deeper. I used that more often with the bass knob dialed back a notch...because I could crank the bejeesus out of it and still be within reasonable, "still get asked back" gig volume limits.

1001/700-II - can basically do what the old ones do, or at least righteously mimick them, but too powerful. By the time you crank them into "that sound", you're risking speaker damage or just plain too loud. I'd pick the 700 over the 1001 specifically because it's LESS power. Can still run plenty loud clean if that's what you're after.

B-string is right on about ignoring manual suggestions in this case. Run the input volume up to just under audible distortion and use the master for overall loudness. Even if you're looking for pure clean, have the Boost cracked open a little bit, not completely off.
 
I ran a 1001ii for a few years into an ampeg 8x10. Massively killer amp. Alot of tones, ton o power and very easy transportation. Now, I got my modern sound with the contour clockwise and old school sabbath the opposite. I think it's the best overall modern amp.

I wanted that Duff tone and realized I could not rail that thing with all that power. I got an '87 800rb, perfect. The woofer vol and boost are all the way up, vol knob just cracked and I have zero interest in anything else. I run it live into an 8x10 and rehearsal into a genz benz 2x15 (like Duff did for AFD). I get the rails without blowing everyone away but its NOT. Low volume
I want to get an old 400rb just cuz.
 
I played for years with a 400RB and 2 single 15" Boogie bass cabinets. I still miss that rig. Take 1 cab for a small gig, two for a big one. Never had a problem with "not enough volume". Kinda the opposite actually. Played an 800RB quite a few times, similar to the 400 but always kept coming back to the 400. I'd buy another 400 today if I could find one that hasn't been beat half to death. That's getting hard.
 
It all depends on what's right for you and your musical situation. I will say that out of those 3 I prefer (and own) the 800rb. I really feel that the 800rb is an all time classic on par with the 360, SVT, etc. I use mine with a crusty fender 2x15 and it's a gloriously dirty old school sound. Of course with the right cabs it does the tight/punchy/clean yet growly thing that it's known for. And the best part is they regularly turn up used for around $400!
 
I own all 3 of the amps listed.
I got rid of the 1001RB but upgraded to a 2001RB.
The 1001 had a little too much power which kept it cleaner.

I still have the 400RB and 800RB and use these mainly for tone and practice.

The 2001RB gets main stage on any large to medium venues due to power, tone, versatility, bi-amping tweeter.
Heavy amp though.
I would've picked up the 700RB if I would have known that it's very similar to the 2001RB.
 
  • Like
Reactions: thedovewarlord
I own a mid 80's 400 rb and it is by far the best sound I could ask for, since it is the perfect combination between a powerful sound and an easy-transportable equipment. It's got that old GK growl I haven't been able to find in any of the new gear they launched. So taking that into consideration, and since you said you really liked the 400 rb sound, I can assure you that if you buy an 800 rb, it will definitely blow your brains out ! I could have bought it but it felt like too much volume for medium-size gigs I'm used to play at ( or even big ones since I play directly from my sansamp ).

I hope this advise serves you right, good luck with that dude ! :bassist:
 
Hopefully everyone,in the conversation,don't think I am trolling? Noticed all the comments,about the 800RB. Just so happens,have one for sale,in the classifieds. I would keep it,but have 3other amps? So if interested PM me. I apologize,if anyone thinks,I crashed the conversation. Take Care! Merry Christmas,to you all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wolfkeller
Hopefully everyone,in the conversation,don't think I am trolling? Noticed all the comments,about the 800RB. Just so happens,have one for sale,in the classifieds. I would keep it,but have 3other amps? So if interested PM me. I apologize,if anyone thinks,I crashed the conversation. Take Care! Merry Christmas,to you all.
I traded a trace Elliot for my first 800rb with this guy, its my live amp and kills! Good dude if you want a mint 800rb
 

Latest posts