OK; Here it is; the big question; Can you hear the difference between the MB 800 and the Fusion in the mix or is it more of a feel thing like when using an all tube amp?
FWIW, my old WA and current 7-Pro did have some tube amp attributes like compression (which may react differently to frequency), increased touch sensitivity as well as smoother high end.
Lastly, don't the MB 500 and MB 800 have different pre amps with the latter being FET with the former being based on non-discrete components?
I was hoping the MB 800 sounded warmer than the 500 based purely on preamp design.
Alan, You and I seem to prefer the warm, clean, harmonically rich, 3-D tones of say the WA being pushed (but before obvious distortion).
Sounds like it takes the 800's overdrive channel to get to this point of harmonic complexity or can you get there with channel A?
Ken, did you have a horrible experience when you were a kid with tubes?
I pretty much only use the 60's and 70's European, used, high end tubes and they seem rock solid (as he looks for wood to knock on)...
Edit: Simul-post with Vic; sounds like the difference is audible when the others are making racket too.
I hear more difference between the MB500 and MB800 than I do between the MB500 and MBF500. Those MOSFETS seem to bring you closer to the more classic GK tone to me ear.
Yes, growing up using tube amps, I learned to hate, hate, hate them. Of course, I gigged Eden and SWR for years with no issue, but those tube executions were 'marketing tubes' that didn't really have an impact on voltage or whatever. Also, gigging with guitarists with tube amps that CONSTANTLY have trouble also makes me VERY happy when I can get 'my sound' from an amp free of tubes! IMO and IME there.
