Agreed.In my experience, regardless of the bass, "piano-like" tones come from higher tension strings and "clank" comes from lower tension strings. I've never had a bass that could do both simultaneously. YMMV
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Agreed.In my experience, regardless of the bass, "piano-like" tones come from higher tension strings and "clank" comes from lower tension strings. I've never had a bass that could do both simultaneously. YMMV
An SVT for clank? Really?Don't forget that the AMP is very important in that sound too. "Grind" and "clank" is Ampeg SVT all day.
Disagree. Too much sizzle on that circuit for clank, IMO.Agreed, but depends on what the OP is looking for. I suggested PJ mainly because of the fundamental P tone +J for that extra clarity. It bridges the gap between P & J without giving up the P tone entirely, and you can still solo the P pickup.
If OP is looking for entirely clank and to move completely away from any resemblance of P-tone, definitely a Stingray or something modern & active. Or even perhaps jazz bass (70's pup spacing maybe) and stainless steel strings - that ought to do it just as well. But the Ric tone is too unique due to pickup type & position to achieve without a true Ric, IMO.
Um, lol what? Have you never dimed the gain on an SVT?An SVT for clank? Really?
Never thought of that... might be worth a try.Has anyone considered lowering the bridge pu on a jazz to achieve an in-between P-J sound? This would still offer the noise cancellation with both pu full-on, but maybe bring up some of those low-mids and raise/de-emphasize the mid-dip frequency, while still retaining some clarity in the high-mids. I've been experimenting with this.
Rotosound Swing Bass 66 ( steel) will do it regardless of bass choice in my opinion ; downside magic tone doesn't last longLove my P, the low mid hump and that classic P bass tone.
However i'm on a quest for less high end roll off, more grind and clearer "piano" like tones.
Should i get a J? Will it give me that? Not planning on ever selling the P, but pondering adding a J to the collection
Also love Geddy's tone, a classic Ric tone (but will never afford a Ric) and some classic 80s tones that i'm fairly sure that were produced on a J eg. OMD, Skids etc
Perhaps it's the rig you are playing through too. I have a Fender P with flats, Fender J 5 string and a Lakland 55-94 Deluxe 5(active electronics). All 3 sound amazing but a big part of your tone also comes from your amp/cab combo. Have you tried other rigs? My P came with rounds that had plenty of clank, I replaced with flats which toned it down a lot but that was my intent. If I roll up the tone knob I get some of it back. Strings make a big difference in your sound. I also like my action very low. A lot goes into your sound, strings, PUs, action, fingerboard material, amp, cab, playing style, etc. Tone is subjective so try various combos until you find "your tone".A j-style bass is typically going to give you a tone that is more flexible than a p (due to the inclusion of two pickups) and is potentially less mid-range-heavy (particularly if you run both pickups full on). Neither bass should have any high-end roll off unless you use the tone knob to roll off the high end. Neither bass should be "clearer" than the other unless you happen to interpret the mid-range focus as impacting clarity. It is possible that you might interpret a less mid-range-heavy tone as more like a piano.
"Grind" means something different to everyone, but I would not say there is any objective reason why a j would offer "more grind." If anything I would go with the p for that.
Yep! I concur. I use Ampeg amps/cabs and my tone is orgasmic. lolDon't forget that the AMP is very important in that sound too. "Grind" and "clank" is Ampeg SVT all day.