I used to do this professionally back in the day, ending in 2002. I've had 3 major label deals (Capital, Atlantic and Interscope). Both bands had very solid, airtight contracts by "big name" music attornies. While the advice of getting an attorney is paramount, there is unfortunately an immutable yet little known truth. With few exceptions (repeat, few exceptions) all things being equal (music, image, label, etc), a band with a better recording contract will attain less success than a band with a bad one. Why? Because the record company will work harder for what has a greater potential profit, period. The younger A/R guys (from my day) may or may not not agree, but the OG cigar chomping moguls got rich off it. If all the artists that we know from rock 'n roll history had great contracts, the landscape would look different. Maybe not
wildly different, but different.
When I got back into music a few years ago, I was in disbelief with these 360 deals, but it is what it is. And Napster and [you

] younger guys are to blame, believing art has not value. And who are our icons now? American Idol winners? No, thanks.
I believe we'll probably never see again the type of giants that were created with the advent of radio, films, TV and MTV. IMO we'll go back to music being a "folk" thing where everybody plays something, a little, like 100 years ago. When I was a kid, a kid who had a Fender without taking music serious was a spoiled brat. Now, my generation of parents spoil our kids with tiny instruments, medium instruments, decent instruments all through their upbringing and for the most part they were just used and abused as toys. A lot more guitars yet a lot less guitar heroes now. There's a lot less yearning and a lot more satiating.
That's all I got for today. I gotta take a nap and tell the neighborhood kids to get off my damned lawn.