• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Has Gretsch been lying to us for over a decade?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm just waiting for stealth changes to occur here.

G2220 Electromatic® Junior Jet™ Bass II Short-Scale, Black Walnut Fingerboard, Torino Green

That's likely all they'll do. A screen grab might be a good idea.

Here we go, just for the sake of things.

screen.png
 
“Fraud” is a setting the bar pretty high and quite frankly a bit dramatic.
Fraud implies intent.
The best anyone can realistically hope for is that they correct the specifications in the future. Hopefully they do.
To get up in arms over a spec sheet typo on a cheapo student level bass ? Doesn’t seem like the end of the world .
 
“Fraud” is a setting the bar pretty high and quite frankly a bit dramatic.
Fraud implies intent.
The best anyone can realistically hope for is that they correct the specifications in the future. Hopefully they do.
To get up in arms over a spec sheet typo on a cheapo bass ? Doesn’t seem like the end of the world .
I agree, worst things in the World presently… but I bought this one assuming that it had humbuckers, a bit annoyed. And worst (hope I’m right), the hum doesn’t look to be completely cancelled when the two pickups are selected like on a Jazz…

**BTW, I missed the fact that Gretsch is owned by FMIC since a long time. As a sidenote, I’m really fond of my little Gretsch Catalina drum kit for what it’s worth ;)
 
Misrepresenting? « Mini-humbucker » means hum canceling pickup for me…

I don't disagree. It's more to the point of, was there a point where it was decided that they would use a different and less expensive pick up with the intent to increase profits while intentionally marketing it as having a (presumably) more expensive pick up.

So, misrepresenting it for monetary gain could be considered fraud I suppose. But again, it's all about the intent. And more importantly, being able to prove it.

Just for clarification, I don't have any doubts about the findings of the esteemed lobster. Just sharing what I have learned after too many years of working with insurance and financial products.

and now I have to watch the video just to see the cat! I really need to get out more
 
I don't disagree. It's more to the point of, was there a point where it was decided that they would use a different and less expensive pick up with the intent to increase profits while intentionally marketing it as having a (presumably) more expensive pick up.

So, misrepresenting it for monetary gain could be considered fraud I suppose. But again, it's all about the intent. And more importantly, being able to prove it.

Just for clarification, I don't have any doubts about the findings of the esteemed lobster. Just sharing what I have learned after too many years of working with insurance and financial products.

and now I have to watch the video just to see the cat! I really need to get out more
Yes, and to paraphrase @Lesfunk : « First World problem »…

…but please Fender, send me two Thundertrons or Thunderblades and I will install them myself, thanks ;) :)
 
Last edited:
“Fraud” is a setting the bar pretty high and quite frankly a bit dramatic.
Fraud implies intent.
The best anyone can realistically hope for is that they correct the specifications in the future. Hopefully they do.
To get up in arms over a spec sheet typo on a cheapo student level bass ? Doesn’t seem like the end of the world .
True, product misrepresentation is no big deal. We should just shut up and get back to playing our crappy student basses. We shouldn't even admit we have them. No real bassist would be caught dead with one. :whistle:
 
Projection is a psychological defense mechanism in which individuals attribute characteristics they find unacceptable in themselves to another person.
True, product misrepresentation is no big deal. We should just shut up and get back to playing our crappy student basses. We shouldn't even admit we have them. No real bassist would be caught dead with one. :whistle:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Robot.G
“Fraud” is a setting the bar pretty high and quite frankly a bit dramatic.
Fraud implies intent.
The best anyone can realistically hope for is that they correct the specifications in the future. Hopefully they do.
To get up in arms over a spec sheet typo on a cheapo student level bass ? Doesn’t seem like the end of the world .
So you think it was a typo???? Why do you think it matters if it’s “student level”. Beginners driving themselves crazy trying to figure out why their humbuckers Are noisy will definitely make me reconsider more expensive instruments or doing any business with this company. It’s fine that you don’t care but to dismiss it just because there are bigger problems in the world doesn’t seem right to me. Yeah we’re not talking about war because this is a bass message board. A super popular bass is not what it claims to be. Now of course you’re right that we don’t know who’s fault it is but it’s somebody’s fault and it’s not the students who aren’t getting what they pay for…
 
So you think it was a typo???? Why do you think it matters if it’s “student level”. Beginners driving themselves crazy trying to figure out why their humbuckers Are noisy will definitely make me reconsider more expensive instruments or doing any business with this company. It’s fine that you don’t care but to dismiss it just because there are bigger problems in the world doesn’t seem right to me. Yeah we’re not talking about war because this is a bass message board. A super popular bass is not what it claims to be. Now of course you’re right that we don’t know who’s fault it is but it’s somebody’s fault and it’s not the students who aren’t getting what they pay for…
Show me the intent to defraud the consumer and I’ll feel more strongly about it.
Hopefully they will update the specs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Poobini
Show me the intent to defraud the consumer and I’ll feel more strongly about it.
Hopefully they will update the specs.
Well, the fact that it’s Ben 10 years leads me to think somebody was doing it on purpose. However, I am more than happy to hear an explanation and if it’s an honest mistake i’ll be happy to give them my business in the future.
 
“Fraud” is a setting the bar pretty high and quite frankly a bit dramatic.
Fraud implies intent.
The best anyone can realistically hope for is that they correct the specifications in the future. Hopefully they do.
To get up in arms over a spec sheet typo on a cheapo student level bass ? Doesn’t seem like the end of the world .

Marketing single coil pickups as "dual-coil humbucking pickups" is not some minor thing that you can just shrug off and ignore. It's one of the biggest features of a bass, with arguably the most impact on the tone. And it's pretty well-defined too, it's not like some marketing speak that can be left to different interpretation.

It's not like some honest mistake, either. Who would have thought that the product specs happen to present the pickups as something that are more expensive to manufacture? That's quite a convenient mistake if you ask me. Calling it fraud might be a stretch, but calling it a "spec sheet typo" is pretty disingenuous imo.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.