• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Headstock Decal Etiquette

if you or I , look at the heal of our Warmoth neck , it does state Licensed by Fender .. ! I would think they have licensed it to look like , feel like , and be very similar to a Fender neck ... which could include the decal ... which is how a Fender neck looks .. !!?? if you want to be a purist , only items that have been touched by Leo Fender should wear a Fender logo .. !

it is 'my' bass ... i'll do whatever I want with it ... but I always give Full Disclosure on everything I might sell ...

so if you're an honest person ... no problem ... if it's meant to deceive someone to make a sale ... nope !
 
You should put a Gibson decal on it...
Jon-Stewart-mind-blown.gif
I'd suggest "*ickenbacker", but I don't want my name on Mr Hall's poopie list if it isn't already! ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: mikeyjm2
In my opinion, a neck from Warmoth is not a Fender neck in spirit or otherwise and should not have the decal on it.

Again, that's my opinion and, of course, opinions vary.

I agree. Once the neck has been replaced with an aftermarket, its no longer a Fender.
 
i know, it's like those people that are present at a murder being considered legally as guilty as the one that pulled the trigger.

Not guity, but contributing to the problem.

But I love how people say "I'm not trying to fool anyone" but put a Fender decal on a non-Fender.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pacojas and Turock
It's cool to customize the instrument however you want, and lots of folks like modding their basses to make them appear older, newer, road-worn, have anachronous features like pickup and bridge covers, etc., but...

I wouldn't put a decal on that makes it look like the bass is anything other than what it is. Unlike a paint color or a pearloid pick guard, the headstock logo is an explicit identifier. IMHO, it would be cooler to find a different logo to put up there. Or no logo—whenever I see a bass with no logo, I know there's a story and the bassist usually likes talking about it.

Like the others said, even if you're scrupulous, there's not guaranteeing that the next owner will be.
 
IMO, only Fender has the right to put its trademark on a product. No one else has the right to do that. If you don't own the name you're putting on, don't put it on. One can say that one is not trying to fool anyone, except for oneself, and that's not a good practice.

It can be simple: If there isn't a Fender logo on something, don't put it on. If there is, you don't have to take it off. And then always tell the truth about what your bass is. Easy.
 
Before I said that I have no problem with it and I still don't. But thinking from a legal standpoint the first sale doctrine says you can do whatever you want with the bass. Mod it. Cut it. Burn it. But placing a registered trademark on an item without permission of the rights holder is against the law. If I bought it from you on eBay I could file a claim that it's a counterfeit and get my money back. Maybe even keeping the bass or eBay may destroy it. Fender isn't going to go after you unless your selling it and then most likely will not bother you unless your selling multiples as a business.
 
  • Like
Reactions: buldog5151bass