TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Something else to considerHi TB!
I've been trying to search for a thread on this but didn't have much luck most likely due to not knowing how to phrase what I wanted to ask.
So I've noticed that on my 5 string Jackson bass which has a bolt on neck, access to the highest two frets on the B/E is basically impossible/painful. I have tried using different methods but because of the size and thickness of the neck plus the body, it's really hard to access these highest frets.
"But who would play all the way up there?!" I hear you say.
Well, this is more of a just discussion thread about the ergonomics and playability rather than note choice. Plus, I paid for these frets so I should be able to play them, right?
So if I want to play on the two highest frets on these strings, I have to grab the neck and the neck pocket with my entire palm which leaves no physical way of fretting the frets on B and E with my pinkie. It's too short. Middle finger works better but then I can't hold my bass properly and I lose control over it.
So, this made me think... What if I had a neck thru bass?
Something like this
View attachment 4269016
Looks way more accessible than this
View attachment 4269076
And it made me think about my 6 string bass that is coming soon to me... which has a bolt on neck... and now I'm thinking that I should have gotten a neck thru instrument because it seems like it would offer a better and easier access to the highest notes on the B/E string.
What do you all think of this?
Am I wrong in thinking that a neck thru offers better accessibility and playability?
Any opinions? I would love to hear some more about this.
Thanks![]()
Hi TB!
I've been trying to search for a thread on this but didn't have much luck most likely due to not knowing how to phrase what I wanted to ask.
So I've noticed that on my 5 string Jackson bass which has a bolt on neck, access to the highest two frets on the B/E is basically impossible/painful. I have tried using different methods but because of the size and thickness of the neck plus the body, it's really hard to access these highest frets.
"But who would play all the way up there?!" I hear you say.
Well, this is more of a just discussion thread about the ergonomics and playability rather than note choice. Plus, I paid for these frets so I should be able to play them, right?
So if I want to play on the two highest frets on these strings, I have to grab the neck and the neck pocket with my entire palm which leaves no physical way of fretting the frets on B and E with my pinkie. It's too short. Middle finger works better but then I can't hold my bass properly and I lose control over it.
So, this made me think... What if I had a neck thru bass?
Something like this
View attachment 4269016
Looks way more accessible than this
View attachment 4269076
And it made me think about my 6 string bass that is coming soon to me... which has a bolt on neck... and now I'm thinking that I should have gotten a neck thru instrument because it seems like it would offer a better and easier access to the highest notes on the B/E string.
What do you all think of this?
Am I wrong in thinking that a neck thru offers better accessibility and playability?
Any opinions? I would love to hear some more about this.
Thanks![]()
That's it! I'm quitting!About 0:20 this little monster shows something I wish I were taught... ever.
The size ratio of her hand to that Ray’s neck is probably about the same as yours would be to a typical sixer’s neck.
It appears this girl’s parents are friends with Victor Wooten and he’s (or somebody has) taught her pretty perfect fret-hand technique, particularly in the upper register. Her tiny hands probably could handle the clunkiest neck joint with that kinda floating thumb technique.
That said, I do enjoy a nice small-heel neck-thru joint. There were a lot of mfrs making them in the 90s.
What do you all think of this?
Am I wrong in thinking that a neck thru offers better accessibility and playability?
Any opinions? I would love to hear some more about this.
Thanks![]()
This Jerzy Drozd is a better example, but its ONLY 28 fret. Obsession V that's on Reverb right now.Need 24 fret access? Peavey Cirrus has you covered. They make 5 and 6 string also.
View attachment 4269435
Need more access and have more money? Le Fay has you covered
View attachment 4269437
Or just get more frets. Jerzy Drozd's 36 fret Excellency IV
View attachment 4269436
Yes and no. It all simply depends on the design of the bass.Hi TB!
I've been trying to search for a thread on this but didn't have much luck most likely due to not knowing how to phrase what I wanted to ask.
So I've noticed that on my 5 string Jackson bass which has a bolt on neck, access to the highest two frets on the B/E is basically impossible/painful. I have tried using different methods but because of the size and thickness of the neck plus the body, it's really hard to access these highest frets.
"But who would play all the way up there?!" I hear you say.
Well, this is more of a just discussion thread about the ergonomics and playability rather than note choice. Plus, I paid for these frets so I should be able to play them, right?
So if I want to play on the two highest frets on these strings, I have to grab the neck and the neck pocket with my entire palm which leaves no physical way of fretting the frets on B and E with my pinkie. It's too short. Middle finger works better but then I can't hold my bass properly and I lose control over it.
So, this made me think... What if I had a neck thru bass?
Something like this
View attachment 4269016
Looks way more accessible than this
View attachment 4269076
And it made me think about my 6 string bass that is coming soon to me... which has a bolt on neck... and now I'm thinking that I should have gotten a neck thru instrument because it seems like it would offer a better and easier access to the highest notes on the B/E string.
What do you all think of this?
Am I wrong in thinking that a neck thru offers better accessibility and playability?
Any opinions? I would love to hear some more about this.
Thanks![]()
You will never hear that from me."But who would play all the way up there?!" I hear you say.
Plus, I paid for these frets so I should be able to play them, right?![]()





I'm going to remember that point for the next time there's a "No money above the 5th fret" thread.About 0:20 this little monster shows something I wish I were taught... ever.
The size ratio of her hand to that Ray’s neck is probably about the same as yours would be to a typical sixer’s neck.
It appears this girl’s parents are friends with Victor Wooten and he’s (or somebody has) taught her pretty perfect fret-hand technique, particularly in the upper register. Her tiny hands probably could handle the clunkiest neck joint with that kinda floating thumb technique.
That said, I do enjoy a nice small-heel neck-thru joint. There were a lot of mfrs making them in the 90s.
Well but if the heel is fat then that wont really do a lot when you make a bigger cutaway in the body, you'll still have to work around the heel. Just noting it, not saying it's a bad choiceI have found that for me, the key to easy access on the highest frets isn't on the back of the bass, but on the front.
View attachment 4269595 View attachment 4269596 View attachment 4269597
I'm having a bass made by a local guitar maker. I tried to describe what I wanted, some extra finger room on the lower bout. He wasn't getting it from my descriptions, so I brought those two bodies to him, along with a neck. I just put the neck in place and then had him feel it, and then the light bulb went on for him.Well but if the heel is fat then that wont really do a lot when you make a bigger cutaway in the body, you'll still have to work around the heel. Just noting it, not saying it's a bad choice![]()