TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I've always thought Bowie was another interesting case - from what I can tell, his guitar playing was never really stellar, more like strum-along folkie, and he tinkered on piano, but he had a very clear vision of what he wanted to make musically. And not just "simple pop stuff" either, he got quite sophisticated at times, theory-wise. I wonder if any video of any of his recording sessions survives...
I don't know Pat but I do know his work - I loved that album he did with Richard Page in the 90s as well.Pat Leonard, after Trillion, worked for Zappa, and the Allman Brothers, then toured with Jackson as musical director. He wrote, recorded, and toured with Madonna for years, then formed Toy Matinee with Guy Pratt and Kevin Gilbert. He has since done more work with Madonna and other "A" list artists, too numerous to list here.
I've known Pat since the mid 70's, and there's no doubt in my mind who wrote most of Madonna's, and some of Jackson's music.
Sure, but different situation. A producer can produce another songwriter's work, or the songwriter can sell the rights to the producer and exit the situation. Whether the songwriter's name remains attached to the IP after the sale is a matter of how the contract is written.The songwriter I now record for sells his material to another writer (with connections) - they are listed under the buyers name.
Almost by definition, popular music is neither harmonically nor rhythmically complicated. Irving Berlin, who composed some of the most commercially successful music of the 20th century, never learned to play piano at more than a rudimentary level and preferred to play exclusively on the black keys. In fact, the piano he used to write most of his music was a custom-designed "transposing" upright.
Totally disagree.Most pop songwriting is a collaborative efforts. How many threads are there here from bassists in original bands who think it's appropriate to develop their own bass lines on songs written by and mate?
A song is melody and lyrics. The rest is arrangement.

The credits on their albums show them as the sole writer on some of their songs, including their biggest hits.
So, if neither of them played an instrument, isn't it interesting that they got complete songwriting credit for just words and melody? I don't doubt that they probably provided enough melody and maybe even harmony, to suggest the correct chords for the musicians and producers. But I just think this is very interesting.
The vocal line and the lyrics make it a song. Its in the word itself.
Totally disagree.
What a shortsighted view of songwriting. Arrangement is not a separate thing. There are countless famous songs where "melody" and "lyrics" alone are quite irrelevant and the arrangement is what "makes" the song. And there is a huge chance that the vocal line was the last thing they wrote. Is the vocal line the arrangement of the arrangement in this case?
"Arrangement"
since for so very long the words and melody were the only copyright-protected parts of a song, i would expect the matter to be as you originally suggested, and not particularly interesting. yet, copyrighted authors are not always the original writers. did not elvis regularly get 50% credit for songs he recorded but did not write?
Here's MJ's demo for Beat It. Nary an instrument to be found.
I don't know Pat but I do know his work - I loved that album he did with Richard Page in the 90s as well.
You may have info I don't, but as a concept I doubt he or any other producer would be complicit in an artist faking a writing credit, particularly one like Madonna who had so much visibility at that moment. There's too much to lose and a terrible professional precedent to set in an intellectual property business.
More likely Madonna provided enough to claim the credit - lyrics, melody, and maybe rough chord progression - and Pat and his team took it from there. Which is fairly normal; what we hear on albums is very much the sonic design of the producer against a rough sketch provided by the songwriter.
Think of Taylor Swift's first few albums with the Nashville sound. Very unlikely she had the skill or experience at that point in her career to take her songs and make them sound _exactly_ like Nashville pop country was supposed to sound at that moment. Doing that is a highly specialized set of skills that goes to the producer role in most situations.
This is true, though instrumentalists have repeatedly gotten screwed in the past when their parts became iconic after the fact. Flea got scale, which is currently just under $30/hour and was probably about half that at the time, for recording "Bust a Move" and it's one of the most recognizable basslines of the last 40 years. Lee Sklar is bitter about how widely his bassline from "Stratus" gets sampled and copied.
If you have a strong enough brand that you can negotiate back end in return for doing a session, you do that. Otherwise, you just work.
Madonna:
1. How did she use "money" to write her early hits like "Lucky Star" which is pretty harmonically simple.
2. She did not learn to play guitar until the late 1990's. Almost 20 years into her career.
I suppose I was talking about whichever ones you meant by saying "The credits on their albums show them as the sole writer on some of their songs, including their biggest hits."Which particular Madonna songs are you talking about specifically? Many of her hits, she has NO writing credit on.