TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Woah now... I wasn't calling out either one of those stars. For all I know, they wrote every thing attributed to them! I was making a general comment on the disparity of compensation between writers and performers. Nashville has a long history of working this "angle"( see: Acuff/Rose).I looking forward to your tell-all biography documenting all the time you spent in the studio with MJ and Madonna. Should be a real page-turner.
Woah now... I wasn't calling out either one of those stars. For all I know, they wrote every thing attributed to them! I was making a general comment on the disparity of compensation between writers and performers. Nashville has a long history of working this "angle"( see: Acuff/Rose).
There's the pride issue, and there's the money issue.
All I'm saying is, how big a deal would it be to ANY of these artists if the money part wasn't such a big deal....
It's a fact, not a theory. Patrick Leonard wrote all the music in all the songs co-written with her, which is most part of her career. She only wrote the lyrics.Evidence?
Evidence?
Thanks, I was wondering if that's what you meant. I don't know which ones she retains credit for because I've never been that interested in her music, but I would assume that if she has a sole songwriting credit on it, it's because she wrote it.I was referring to songs in which she received (sole) 100 percent credit. I've edited my previous post.
Me Against the Music - I think she had more than a little help on that one. See all the co-writers listed.
You'll See - David Foster had a hand in that one, too.
Most of her songs list one or more co-writers.
Footage of Madge singing and playing guitar in her early ska-pop-band-thingie. Footage @2'12"
Ya know, starting to think TB might not be the best place to come for actual facts, matters of nut width notwithstanding
Footage of Madge singing and playing guitar in her early ska-pop-band-thingie. Footage @2'12"
Ya know, starting to think TB might not be the best place to come for actual facts, matters of nut width notwithstanding
To editorialize, I would assert that most music artists with careers spanning multiple decades tend to bring in other writers to keep it going. Kiss come to mind. And Aerosmith. Iggy Pop's "Passenger" was a riff thought up by a guitarist with whom he teamed to co-write songs for one album. Iggy did an album or two with Steve Jones co-writing. I don't see how having co-writers invalidates an artist.
This is a song about Madonna's breakup with Sean Penn. Her catalogue is full of confessional work. She's not a hack, she's an auteur.
It's a thing. There's a whole subtopic going on about how some musicians in the earlier days were robbed of their writing credits because people in the business figured they could get away with it. They got away with it, in part, because too many people were willing to say "I don't think that (kind of) person would have been able to write that song."
And yet, here we are on the same thread trying to suggest that, in another context (one where the person actually does retain credit), that (kind of) person isn't capable.
Not sure what that says about us but it's time for lunch. Homemade soup. I made it myself.
The biggest example I can think of that no one would question authorship on is the whole Aja album. Walter and Donald do play instruments on that album, but almost all the heavy lifting for them was done by seasoned session pros, and they brought in lots of those guys and paid them handsomely, sometimes recording many different players for the same song until they got the vibe they were looking for. It could be argued (and I would not do that) that their contributions as songwriters were minimal, but you won't hear anyone saying that, because it would be ridiculous. They wrote the songs, they hired the talent to play it well, they guided the effort and signed off on the final version of everything. Why is it so clear that they deserve credit, and not as clear for others who are doing essentially the same thing?
There's a difference between songwriting, instrumentation, production and engineering. A lot of artists have their hand in more than one piece of that, and often need assistance to get the best product possible.
To editorialize, I would assert that most music artists with careers spanning multiple decades tend to bring in other writers to keep it going. Kiss come to mind. And Aerosmith. Iggy Pop's "Passenger" was a riff thought up by a guitarist with whom he teamed to co-write songs for one album. Iggy did an album or two with Steve Jones co-writing. I don't see how having co-writers invalidates an artist.
This is a song about Madonna's breakup with Sean Penn. Her catalogue is full of confessional work. She's not a hack, she's an auteur.
Yeah BTW I think the thread questioned whether these artists are capable of writing the whole song alone, no one questions they are capable of writing the whole structure of the vocal line but in my book who writes the arrangement is an "author", not a "producer".She writes usually with other songwriters but 70% of Madonna’s first album songs were written by her and only Her including the US TOP 5 Hit “Lucky Star” and her first single, released only as maxi-single, “Everybody” (that peaked #03 at Maxi-Single Sales Chart in US and #107 at Singles Charts). In UK her song “Gambler” that peaked #05 on the charts was also 100% written just by Madonna.
Actually, who writes the arrangement is an arranger. By your logic, every cover version ever recorded that wasn't a note-for-note reproduction would require a revision to authorship.Yeah BTW I think the thread questioned whether these artists are capable of writing the whole song alone, no one questions they are capable of writing the whole structure of the vocal line but in my book who writes the arrangement is an "author", not a "producer".
Easy to jump to the conclusion that sexism is behind the dismissals but I’m not convinced. Madonna chose to work the “sex kitten” persona and image to her advantage from the start. It’s pretty much inevitable that anyone who does that and who doesn’t also demonstrate an obvious musical talent is going to be labelled as being not much more than a pretty face. George Michael (for example) suffered from the same sorts of unfair judgments.I hate to say it, but I think there is also a bias against women. Madonna can't write songs because she's a girl. Not truly "talented" like the overweight neckbeards playing blues or something to half-empty bars in strip malls. No, those are the "real" musicians. Not Taylor Swift.