TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
It's different for each of us. But your wife knows the answer.
I suppose it's like that line reformed alcoholics say, about how many drinks were sufficient back in their boozing days: "One was too many, and a hundred wasn't enough."
I have a formula:
TM = B+2
Where TM is too many and B is the number of basses I have when asked.
One observation, there is a lot of support for having one of each, i.e., P, J, P/J, Active, Hollowbody, upright, ABG, variations of basses strung with flats or rounds, but I didn't see a reference to the need for a short scale bass.
One observation, there is a lot of support for having one of each, i.e., P, J, P/J, Active, Hollowbody, uprights, variations of basses strung with flats or rounds, but I didn't see a reference to the need for a short scale bass.
It's different for each of us. But your wife knows the answer.
There is no such thing as too many basses but IMHO over 10 basses is probably getting into ridiculous territory.
Only limiting factor should be $
Thank God I'm not married.... no limit. And I'm only at 4 (+1 in parts waiting to be assembled one day, +1 neck that will become a parts bass after I teach myself to re-fret).
Who knows.
Personally, I believe that every gigging musician should own at least two basses. Beyond that, it becomes a matter of preference. If three basses is your comfort zone, that's perfect. If it's thirty-three basses, that's perfect, too.
There is no such thing as too many basses but IMHO over 10 basses is probably getting into ridiculous territory.
