I was just doing some reading on my "throne", when I saw this article in Readers Digest. Of course, your situation immediately jumped into my mind.
Check it out: Invalid Link Removed
Check it out: Invalid Link Removed
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Does anyone really see this as a "heroic" act? If so, I think we are really lowering the standards of what we consider a hero. Now if the car had been burning or hanging precariously over a dropoff.....
It's still not clear from the OP whether or not the lady was in immediate danger of losing her life. That makes a big difference. Doesn't mean he deserves to get sued, it just means he did a dumb, albeit well meaning thing. I really can't imagine rescue personnel like cops and paramedics just standing there if she was in danger of dying.
You make a fair point; in order to see this as a "heroic" act, one must be at least over the age of 12 to understand the differences between movies/comic books and reality. Since you seem (ahem) handicapped in this regard, perhaps you should spend a few years developing your cognitive facilities before chiming in on the discussion, yes?

You also have to be over the age of 12 to understand the difference between heroism and common civic duty.
Safe to say we only have one side of a story that has many sides (as many as there were people at the scene). And there's too much information missing to not be skeptical of the OP's perspective of events.
Not to mention referring to himself as a "hero" in the first place.![]()
Hm? Lownered? wazzat?
A 'loner' thread is a thread wherein the original poster does not post after the OP.