theres nothing to debate, a new fender parts bass thats been gone over with a grinder to "look" old is not going to sound or feel like an instrument thats fifty plus years old and has been played on, it just isnt. You can to give the appearance of age or use, but you cant replicate the passing of time and the effects it has on wood and metal. Go to a vintage guitar store where they have verifiable great playing old fender basses, and compare it to a new fender roadworn bass, the differences should be obvious, that being said not ALL old basses are great players, some are complete junk and should not be used as a reasonable comparison, there are varying conditions that these old instruments may have been subjected to, but anything decent will set itself apart from a newer bass, its something you will know when you play one.
Sure - IF you have enough experience and knowledge (which also can't be faked, just like true ageing!). I've been playing for 35 years, and can (mostly) tell the difference. Many others can't - but that doesn't mean to say they deserve to be ripped off. The whole relic'ing can of worms has opened the door for a whole lot of dishonesty to creep in: the problem came with charging MORE for a worn-looking instrument than a new/clean one - perfectly good instruments are being f*cked up to make extra bucks, and I have a big problem with that. Wear and tear can be beautiful in its own way (if it's real, because then it tells a story), but it shouldn't cost extra.
