The funnest tribute thing that I ever did was a Yes band. Freaking awesome and challenging but ..... venues were not exactly easy to come by... 
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Any really good song or piece of music exists to be played by whoever can interpret it in a way that can touch someone.
HA!!! I hadn't a clue. I like strange coincidences.I may hit you up now for thoughts, experience, whatever... iffin ya don't mind of course. I'd be happy to share whatever I could once we're up and running.
However---and I'm not talking about you personally---but, when I did the original scene there were alot of bands writing pedestrian music with trite lyrics and acting like rock stars.
Honestly, I can see how someone in a cover band can find that obnoxious and want to strike a blow against those guys.
I think you already understand that "weekend warriors", as you call them, play originals as well as covers.The operative word in your statement is "can", though- not everyone who does a cover reinterprets the song the way Hendrix did with "All Along The Watchtower", for example. Take your average weekend warrior sports bar duffers (not talking about anyone here, of course) belting out "Mustang Sally" for the billionth time- are they reinterpreting the song, or just regurgitating it?
Sure you can put your own stamp on a great song, but I don't see that done very often.
I have to agree with the thread start that cover bands are worthless.
Somebody belting out their own stuff for the first time can be just as dreadful as someone playing Mustang Sally for the billionth, despite their no doubt noble intentions.
Oh yeah, I freely admit that 90% of original bands are total crap. And some of them are famous rock stars!
I have a problem with cover/tribute bands.

And 90% of cover bands are total crap. And ALL of them are making money.![]()
Yep, agreed.Oh yeah, I freely admit that 90% of original bands are total crap. And some of them are famous rock stars!
But without the remaining 10%, rock music would be stagnant, like an exhibit in a museum.
And 90% of cover bands are total crap. And ALL of them are making money.![]()
The operative word in your statement is "can", though- not everyone who does a cover reinterprets the song the way Hendrix did with "All Along The Watchtower", for example. Take your average weekend warrior sports bar duffers (not talking about anyone here, of course) belting out "Mustang Sally" for the billionth time- are they reinterpreting the song, or just regurgitating it?
Sure you can put your own stamp on a great song, but I don't see that done very often.
I think we're confusing the issue with "songs that have been overplayed or considered cliche." Although I'm gonna stick to my guns and so although it isn't has likely, I stand ready to be entertained by someones vision of Mustang Sally.
The interpretation vs regurgitation is gonna be a really subjective thing to navigate.
Totally disagree with this statement.
Just for one small example, you need to go find a TV performance of Judy Garland singing Harold Arlens Over the Rainbow somewhere around 1963. She was near the end of her rope and her life. She had sung that song dozens of times.
But at that moment, his song- totally HER expression of what SHE was feeling.
If your statement were true we have just devalued all music.
Any really good song or piece of music exists to be played by whoever can interpret it in a way that can touch someone.
And that is yet another reason that makes this thread kinda dumb...

...
To make a cross reference - If you write an original diary, then its how YOU feel. If your reading someone elses, then re-copy it because it applies to you, your not stating how you feel. With bass, you get some lee-way in cover songs, to change it up a little here and there. But your still not expressing to the world, or local bar, how you feel. Its someone elses expression being re-itterated.
With all due respect, you're cross reference misses the point.
A "diary entry" is presumably private and not intended for anyone else to read, let alone use or repeat in public.
This is not the case with songs - that is, unless you are one of those rare composers who is only composing for yourself and also don't want your material heard, let alone played by others or repeated in public.
Further - ascribing motive - i.e. "If you're feeling sad..." or "That song was written as an expression of sadness..." - you are simply doing what many others are doing in this thread - which is assigning your idea of why someone is doing something to "others" and commenting on how YOU'D feel - not on the reality of the situation.
You hear it time and again - People all think this song's about [X] only to discover from the author it was actually about [Y].
It's the very same thing with playing in a band of any "kind". My motivation for doing so and yours could be very similar - could be miles apart - you (and I) just don't know.
What I do know is that I DON'T know why you do it and I would never presume to speculate. Furthermore, I'd certainly not judge you based on my limited understanding of you or why you do anything.
That's the ugly subtext of this discussion - that people have judged others (harshly and unfairly in many cases) and done so "on the record" with comments describing their musical cohorts as "sell-outs" or "elitist" or "worthless".
Hopefully, if there's anything of value to be gained from this discussion, it's that assessing value judgments (good or bad) to musicians simply by the "type" of band they are in is at best a waste of time, at worst severely limiting their own opportunity to be musical.
