• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

I have a theory about maple fingerboards

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have a theory about maple fingerboards- while maybe not as warm as rosewood, it allows the tone of the bass to "breathe" more. Thus, allowing the more subtle nuances of the bass to come through. It can always be dulled down by turning the tone knob down. Thoughts?
 
Maybe on some basses but not necessarily on others.

You might be right about the beautiful Warmoth birdseye maple neck & FB on my franken 5er. But when I think about hearing "subtle nuances" in my tone, I really dont approach my T-20 and T-40 that way! :D:p
 
I think it's cross sensing. It's lighter and therefore registers "brighter." I doubt anyone can tell the difference blindfolded if the bass were exactly the same except for the fingerboard.

Now, ebony, graphite or ebonol -- THAT feels different. Sounds sharper.
 
I have a theory about maple fingerboards- while maybe not as warm as rosewood, it allows the tone of the bass to "breathe" more. Thus, allowing the more subtle nuances of the bass to come through. It can always be dulled down by turning the tone knob down. Thoughts?

I'm not inclined to believe this. Fist of all there really is no way to come close to testing it. Because of the inherent differences from one bass to another even another of the exact same type simply getting one with a different fingerboard could hardly attributed to any massive shift in tone (if there is any).
 
Ive been saying this for years, but I gave up, as according to TB, Im totally wrong.

I've been seriously considering this as well. I believe that every part of a bass can affect the tone but it's a matter of degrees and not nearly as blatant as so many seem to suggest. Nothing can be completely discredited but by the same token nothing can be absolutely proven. Keep in mind none of the wood on a bass ever comes into direct contact with the strings unless the bass is fretless and even then it's only the fingerboard not the body or neck woods.

Put shortly, I think that all wood in a bass affects the tone of a bass but I think that considering the comparatively small quantity of fingerboard wood to the neck or body it doesn't have as large an effect as so many seem to believe.
 
With Jazz Basses, I'd go maple all the way. I have experienced many a J, and I've always found that when they've got maple boards, they are more comfortable to play, look cooler, and I've sometimes noticed a very slight subtle tonal differenece. However, it's so insignificant that it wouldn't really matter to anyone but a tone-nut who probably would be buying some 10K boutique bass anyway.

With a Ric, I'm fine with rosewood (don't really have a choice do I? :D). A Ric actually carries a brighter tone than a jazz, and a more, clanky sound, and has rosewood.

When it comes down to it, it's all about hardware (bridges especially), strings, pickups and the hands. The woods only do a little bit of the job. Unless you play upright, in which case you're on the wrong half of the forum my friend.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.