This thread is 34 pages of two irrational extremes calling the other passive aggressive and illogical.
Anyone else see the problem here?
Anyone else see the problem here?
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Truktek2 said:Just read through most of the forum....and I just have to say....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RFZrzg62Zj0&feature=youtube_gdata_player
This thread is 34 pages of two irrational extremes calling the other passive aggressive and illogical.
Anyone else see the problem here?
Why is it so important to convince someone else that your property is what you believe it to be?
Just read through most of the forum....and I just have to say....
The problem is nobody quite knows what any of this means. I play some cheapo basses that sound great, not just "reasonably good". That is because I personally have gone over them with a fine tooth comb making them just what I wanted. They started with nice pieces of wood picked out by me and "tonewood" doesn't make much difference anyway.
So now we have a question. Am I still playing a "cheap" bass? If I have an SX Pleked and plays like a Sadowsky, what is it? Yes it's $200 more for one thing. But uncounted here is what is my time worth. If I paid Roger Sadowsky to do the things I did then the bass could be worth thousands. But if I do it, and only use some of my time, is it still a cheap bass? But on the other hand *I* really like what I do to a bass so when I'm done it's specifically tailored to me. Surely that sort of thing is worth money?
The bottom line therefore, is that rules like "you get what you pay for" are simply not always valid. Sometimes you pay what the guy is charging regardless of what he's doing. And sometimes you don't pay at all and get great. So while there is SOME truth to judging a bass by it's headstock shape, it's also easy to be fooled by a Squier or SX because you don't know where it's been or who has been tweaking on it. On the other hand if you are the sort of person who isn't much with tools, then obviously you have to pay someone else to do it, and the more talented they are, the better job they do, which means the more they charge. Which is sort of what expensive boutique basses are about.
That's not the issue at all. It's typically non-boutique players justifying why it's NOT good to own them.
It is "you are fricking high"If I have an SX Pleked and plays like a Sadowsky, what is it?
True, if you are talking about Gibson, Fender or any other major brand that charge you thousands more for... nothing really.The bottom line therefore, is that rules like "you get what you pay for" are simply not always valid.
95%+ of our instruments since inception have been either 3-piece or one piece. When folks work with us to spec out an instrument and they are interested in a 5, 7 or 9 piece neck we are straight forward with them and tell them that north of a three piece neck you gain next to nothing from a stability standpoint...it's all about looks at that point -- which is fine, but not necessary from a functional standpoint.
At an extreme level you can actually argue that more glue = less resonance = diminished tone. There is definitely a stability / structural benefit when you make the jump from one piece to three (there's also an added cost), but north of 3 pieces it's more about achieving a certain look.
You've nothing to prove.
Nor am I trying to prove anything, but foundation of these threads are to justify cheap basses and start stuff with those who own expensive basses.
You are not obligated, like a knight to a leige lord, to defend the reputation of expensive basses. You are not duty bound to slug it out for 30 pages because someone's opinion clashed with yours.
To claim they "started something" with you is absurd. And Juvenile. Why are you on here, arguing with phantoms? Go play your awesome expensive bass, leave him to his opinion.
It's not absurd. It's a double standard. Bashing expensive basses and the people who use them is condoned. Bashing cheap basses is snobbish.
), it came bone stock with the original hardshell and cost around $350. Last summer I finally had it with the stock passive PJ Jackson pickups that came with it.... I decided to go all-out with it and put a set of Seymour Duncan Music Mans in there.... that and a 3 band EQ (total investment around $300) was the best thing I ever did for that bass.... other than buying the bass. I've taken it out alot since I modded it and done Country, Blues, Folk, Rock and Metal gigs with it.... I did a few recordings with it. One was a Skynyrd type tune, the other was more along the lines of Metallica. It held up amazingly well for all that it's been thru.... The only thing that I'd like to get for it is a Hipshot D-tuner.... but that's on my "want" list...It's not absurd. It's a double standard. Bashing expensive basses and the people who use them is condoned. Bashing cheap basses is snobbish.
Bottom line: Whichever choice you've made, cheap or boutique or anywhere in-between, if it works for you that's all that matters. And if you go to extensive lengths defending it, you're likely somewhat insecure about whether it's right for you or not.