Thank you.This had been today's Bisontennial minute.
I was gonna say jazz bass. It looks jazzy to me.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Thank you.This had been today's Bisontennial minute.

No, not right, it's not a Jazz and that in the photo is a Vista Sonic.
@Matt O for the win. Here's my call:
That's not a Burns Bison. That's some sort of Burns-styled homebrew with a neck off some other bass.
The picture Matt posted shows that the body shape is all wrong: the horns are way too big, even for a Bison.
Now look at the headstock and the tuners. That's not a Burns neck. Someone with a more encyclopedic knowledge of old basses than I have ought to be able to figure out where that neck came from.
Now look at the pickguard: it's multi-piece, but not in anywhere near the same configuration as a Legend.
Now look at the square bridge cover: that screams "homemade," or at the very least "low volume hobby builder."
The pickup might be a Burns pickup, but Burns never made a bass with one pickup in that position.
I think someone made a body that was sort of Burns-inspired (unsurprising given the time period), salvaged a neck from some other bass, and built their own. Could have even been a very early Burns prototype...I have no idea. But it's not a Bison or any other production Burns.
View attachment 4346403 View attachment 4346404
Not the bass in question but it looks like, at some point, we had a real Burns.
Yep, I think I pulled the wrong one but your reissue looks closeHey, that's my bass, so you can see I have some familiarity with Burns.
Close, the end of the pig head looks a little rounder and I don't see the slanted string tree but it could be it.