• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Inaccurate fender.

I got an email from fender advertising among other things their new 63 precision bass. It stated that the 63 model was the first bass to have a laminated rosewood fretboard, how do i know this is not accurate? Because i have an old 62 precision and it has a laminated rosewood board on it, dont these people know about their own history?
 
I've been watching Fender Marketing copywriters totally blow their own history since the last century. It's freaking amazing.

It's just meaningless hype. If FMIC doesn't pay any attention, why should you? :rollno:
 
It'd be better if they concentrated their energies into trying to make decent instruments, no?

Besides, it's not really their own history anyway, it's a history FMIC bought off CBS, who bought it off the real history maker.
 
Everyone calls the first contoured body Precision a '55, including Fender Custom Shop, but the first ones were produced in late '54 and into '57 when the split pup model was introduced. An official launch is just that. It's when they put it into full production. It's possible you got a pre-launch one.
 
Part of the problem knowing Fender history from the Leo days is everything was a little loose and often on-the-fly. I think Fender historians often find many examples of dates that don't even match up with what Fender themselves were publishing at the time. You need to recall that R&D, manufacturing, and sales were all run differently by the different henchman. It seems sometimes Don Randall and the sales and marketing guys would not exactly know what Leo and Freddy Tavares were changing, and other times they (sales) would ask for changes before the manufacturing side could deliver.
 
I played a P bass dated 12/59 for 18 years. It was three color sunburst with the slab rosewood board. I let it go some time ago for a fabulous sum. FWIW Fender is building better sounding basses than that one now and I have several.
 
I also remember the story as to how the '57 and '62 Reissue Strats came to be. The fewtures were not exclusive or even 100% correct to those two years, but in the American mind those two years were better than the years around them due to a combination of more positive memories and fewer negative memories. Marketing before accuracy, but still good and successful product.
 
Like said before, the veneered rosewood was introduced in the 2nd half of 1962, so technically speaking 1963 is the first "real year" that there were veneered fretboards*

*(and that's not completely true, the very first mustangs (guitar) from 1965 had a slab rosewood fretboard, and those were no leftovers from Jaguar necks, since they had the pearloid dots, while slabboard jags had clay dots)
 
Wow, off by a couple months. They should be shut down by the government!

Not to mention all that stuff about beating up perfect new bodies to make them look old back there in Mexico... The only explanation possible is that Fender is managed by the devil!

Don't really get why people get so bothered by such small things
 
Fender rosewood fingerboards first appeared in 1959 (slab) Around the end of 1962 the radius was cut in the rosewood. (veneer)

This is what I believe is accurate and I do not at all blame marketing copy for stating that laminate boards started in '63 - we are not talking about entries in the Fender encyclopedia of basses and their various quirks. How do we think marketing communications should handle the neck-width options that were offered at various junctures? I understand how this practice - mass communications - may offend those who are more clued in, but decisions have to be made, and we can content ourselves with knowing better.