Yes. But as indelible riffs go, Stairway to Heaven grates less than Smoke on the Water.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
But Plant grates more than anyone/anything.Yes. But as indelible riffs go, Stairway to Heaven grates less than Smoke on the Water.
But Plant grates more than anyone/anything.
Yes. I'm sure you're right.Only to you...
And to me!Only to you...
Paice was a VERY good drummer. But Bonham was a heavy, heavy influence on drummers of every genre. It's very interesting to me to hear a jazz drummer or a R&B drummer or a whatever genre drummer, high profile amazing drummers, mention what a huge influence Bonham was. He was unique. Paice was very good but he was not unique, did not have the influence that Bonham had. That's a hard period. I've watched this chat since it began and the take away for me is that Deep Purple were waay more popular in Europe than in the states. I have Machine Head and Live in Japan as most of us rockers from the 70s here in the states had and thats it. I've got every Zep album. That's how it went here. It's not even close here. In the states Zep is in another atmosphere.
I can listen to Stairway all day long. I can listen to SotW - or the whole Machine head Album - all day long. Just because they're overplayed doesn't mean they aren't awesome.Yes. But as indelible riffs go, Stairway to Heaven grates less than Smoke on the Water.
Well once again the thread isn't about which band was better, or even which one you prefer, it's about whether they are in the same league--and that goes for the members as well.Paice was very good but he was not unique, did not have the influence that Bonham had.
I mean zeppelin sold way more albums than DP. Sold out stadiums. DP couldn’t touch that. Not here in the us. I mean that’s just facts. So if you say they were on even par with your friends then I believe you. And it was unique. Not the norm. It just wasn’t.US here. Or Texas, anyway, but spent lots of time living in another state. 8^) Different experience. The people I hung with were, on average, as into Deep Purple as Zep. A lot of us had as many (or more) DP albums as Zep albums. Especially the MK 2 and Mk 3 versions. For me, the Mk 2 era especially was consistently excellent, whereas most Zep albums had songs that didn't do a lot for me. Still, I wish (like all Zep fans) that John had lived. Who knows where they'd have gone?
Are you of the opinion that popularity equals quality? If so, then you must agree that Adele's 21 and the soundtrack to The Sound of Music are better than any Led Zeppelin album and that Elton John and Madonna are better than Led Zeppelin.I mean zeppelin sold way more albums than DP. Sold out stadiums. DP couldn’t touch that. Not here in the us. I mean that’s just facts. So if you say they were on even par with your friends then I believe you. And it was unique. Not the norm. It just wasn’t.
Ok so this conversation has now gone there. Lol. Ok yea. Zeppelin is as popular as Adele. Stay with me here. I was responding to a guy who said the friends he hung with liked Zeppelin as much as DP. I never said sales equated quality. But his experience was unique because as evidenced by sales in records and concert tickets sold Zep was way more popular than DP. At least in the US. It’s just not even close. So when I grew up, I was born in 1961, Zep was absolutely and it wasn’t even close in another atmosphere than DP. That said we loved Machine Head and Made In Japan. I’ve never said that Zep was better or worse. To each his own. If you like DP better than Zep good for you. Whatever floats your boat. You have a love for music. Many do not. I feel sad for them. There is a lot more of music out there I don’t listen to but I don’t think it’s better or worse it’s just not my thing. But Zep was by far and it’s not even close more loved in the US than DP was. So his experience that his friends liked DP as much as Zep would not have been the norm. And the idea that Ian Paice was as influential of a drummer and Bonzo is just ridiculous. Now that’s not saying Paice wasn’t a good drummer. He was. DP was a good band. But not a great iconic band. Just another good rock band from the 70s. And as far as I’m concerned DP was one of the pioneers of hard rock. But they are not in the same league as Zeppelin. How else can you quantify that if not by sales of records and tickets. Anything else is just subjective opinion.Are you of the opinion that popularity equals quality? If so, then you must agree that Adele's 21 and the soundtrack to The Sound of Music are better than any Led Zeppelin album and that Elton John and Madonna are better than Led Zeppelin.
DP were better than LZ at times. But overall, LZ were better.
DP were definitely better from the aspect of live performances.
It's a pleasure to read such a deeply thought out and well-argued opinion.