• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Is Deep Purple in the same league with Led Zeppelin?

Is Deep Purple in the same league with Led Zeppelin?


  • Total voters
    706
rofl! I just watched a few spy movies the other day and am now having fun imagining
-what conspiracies’ actions they could have been executing while on tour or in the studio
-What other bands and publicly known organisations would be part of their syndicate
-would there have been bands that were part of competing or contrary syndicates against whom they were taking action?

Maybe they were part of the Bat Protection League and had teamed up against Ozzy :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: MattZilla
It occurs to me that this thread would have been quite different if it had been "Is Deep Purple in league with Led Zeppelin?".
They way I see the question is first, you have to establish what puts Led Zeppelin into the league that they are in? Then, look at Deep Purple and see if they posses those attributes and requirements? When I did that, it was clear that they certainly had some, but lacked some very significant others.. the ones that actually set Zeppelin apart from almost all the rest of the world class rock bands.
 
They way I see the question is first, you have to establish what puts Led Zeppelin into the league that they are in? Then, look at Deep Purple and see if they posses those attributes and requirements? When I did that, it was clear that they certainly had some, but lacked some very significant others.. the ones that actually set Zeppelin apart from almost all the rest of the world class rock bands.
Yeah like minus writing their own material!
 
Like: Hush, River Deep Mountain High and Kentucky Woman.. and a couple others l think a Beatles and a Hendrix tune, too? Smh..
Yeah but they are full songs and they always credited the original artist unlike Zep who blatantly stole riffs and lyrics and never gave credit to the original artists. It is no wonder why Zep were in and out if Court for their Plagiarism. Purple are far more original and not a cover band like Zep!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tanner5382
It's true they used some traditional blues licks in a handful of songs. That's very common in the blues. Page was heavily influenced by Willie Dixon and should have credited him with a few songs when he released them with Zeppelin. I don't like that kind of bs either. They are crediting him now, though. The intro to Staiway is similar to another song. But, zeppelin won that case and it is over. A lot of songs stem from other songs especially in the blues. So, "similar" is par for the course in music... the blues, more so than most genres.
 
In the day, both were "my bands"...loved both then & love both, still.
Learned mucho from both.
Burn was the last DP album I bought (March '74) until recently. Eventually, picked up their back catalog (Mk I) & Stormbringer. Within the past couple years, I broke down & bought the Bob Ezrin/Steve Morse albums.
In the day, Led Zep's HOTH was the last one I bought until I got the rest, like, 20 years later. I cut my teeth trying to play/learn their 1st 5 albums.
 
I don’t really think Led Zeppelin and Deep Purple are in the same category. They were a huge influence on bands like Rush, Heart, Van Halen, but that doesn’t mean they are the same band.

Whitesnake began life as a Deep Purple spinoff, and they have more in common with Deep Purple as a result.
 
mages?q=tbn:ANd9GcTqErW48G71DChGt95poEbH7Nzu4iahZxQhtFymCCR6nOmK4EkslTxCzwGQbwYABGqEK3c&usqp=CAU.jpg
 

Latest posts