TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I agree about with the others about alot of them being ripped from files and not truly isolated master tracks, however, there have been a few Ive come across where the playing has been an eye opener. Sloppy and just not good, but it sounds fine in the mix. I wont name names but some bigger players have disappointed me. *cough* *cough*
I looked thru the entire thread and noticed some people commented about the track being midi.
Then said studio will not see any of my money.
Typically, mixing engineers and producers want to start with as full range a bass tone as possible so they have more options for making it work in the mix. That's why their first priority is usually getting a clean DI signal. If you've cut a lot of bandwidth before it gets to them it limits how they can fit it among the other instruments.
So, for example, if there's a gap in a mix where some 1500hz would make things sound better and you've cut it all out already, you are not a solution to that problem.
Never mind that garbage, listen to Entwistle.
A large number of those tracks are reproductions made by Guitar Hero/Rock Band musicians.
Yeah I’ve always found that when I, or we (my band) are signing the check the engineer is pretty a accommodating in working to preserve my tone.I agree with you up to a point, certainly when I have been in a studio as hired help I have been at the mercy of what is wanted and needed but when I have been recording with my own bands and my own music I have never had a problem reaching an agreement about how I/we want to sound.. my point was that it´s not necessary to start off with that horrible thin tone to end up with a better tone if that´s what one wants.