• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Issues with the Fender Ultra Jazz 5

When you see stuff like that. It makes me wonder, are there any bass players working at Fender?

The first time I'd see something like that come down the line, I'd be pullin' the big lever and be bringing the production line to a standstill until that stuff was figured out.
But that's just me :)
19cad7bcb1a73e9b7e86c3c03dac8280.gif


original.gif


giphy.gif
 
Last edited:
Imagine this: my 2015 Squier Dimension 5-string has the same 3" bridge and the same problem of the G string sitting too close to the edge, though I guess a little less close than the Fender Ultras. Plus I had to file the slot in the G string saddle because I couldn't get the G string low enough. But all this is about a €400 Squier, not a €2250 Fender....:rollno:

upload_2019-12-15_15-29-38.png
 
Imagine this: my 2015 Squier Dimension 5-string has the same 3" bridge and the same problem of the G string sitting too close to the edge, though I guess a little less close than the Fender Ultras. Plus I had to file the slot in the G string saddle because I couldn't get the G string low enough. But all this is about a €400 Squier, not a €2250 Fender....:rollno:

View attachment 3631542

I have that bass, and hadn’t noticed it. Thanks for the post!
 
  • Like
Reactions: DJ Bebop
One I've owned 5 Fender American Jazz V's (1 deluxe & 4 Standard/Series) and an Fender American P5 in the past 18 years. They have all left me wanting.

For the Fender Ultra money I bought an Sadowsky Metro Express 5 and am happy as can be. I can see Roger Sadowsky has not overlooked a thing. Nothing gets past his eye. Everything is perfect. No distractions. No issues. 8.4 lbs. He sets up each instrument and does the final inspection before the instrument ships. Truly a joy to play. My band mates dig this bass.
 
I wonder if they're installing the wrong bridges at the factory?

Well, interestingly enough, they did install the wrong neck on mine.

I had the “Mocha Burst” finish with a maple fingerboard:

303C6BA6-5678-477F-B5C2-2843122AD873.jpeg


After I returned it, Some folks started asking questions about why it had a maple fingerboard.

Fender’s website only shows rosewood as the neck option for that finish:

upload_2019-12-15_10-57-13.jpeg


The store got into contact with Fender and it turns out that it was a mistake. This was the only Mocha Burst that had a maple neck/fingerboard.
 
After I returned it, Some folks started asking questions about why it had a maple fingerboard.
Fender’s website only shows rosewood as the neck option for that finish:
The store got into contact with Fender and it turns out that it was a mistake. This was the only Mocha Burst that had a maple neck/fingerboard.
Collector's item?
 
Collector's item?

From a novelty standpoint, maybe. But I don't think there's gonna be any appreciation in value.

Fender's no longer in their heyday and there are way more bass manufacturers with better quality standards. IMHO the stuff that has a chance of appreciating in value these days are small builders who are putting out great quality stuff, like Sadowsky, Serek, Michael Tobias, FBass, etc.

There will be a day where you can't really get those basses anymore and the limited quantity might drive the price up. Just like the fact that Leo isn't making '60s Precisions anymore.

That's why I think that in 20 years a Pudulla might be worth a good bit more since Michael Pedulla retired earlier this year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DJ Bebop
Well, interestingly enough, they did install the wrong neck on mine.

I had the “Mocha Burst” finish with a maple fingerboard:

View attachment 3631698

After I returned it, Some folks started asking questions about why it had a maple fingerboard.

Fender’s website only shows rosewood as the neck option for that finish:

The store got into contact with Fender and it turns out that it was a mistake. This was the only Mocha Burst that had a maple neck/fingerboard.
That’s one of nicest screwups I’ve ever seen
 
At some point I was gassing for the deluxe fender the one with the passive mod but couldnt afford it at the time.
When the elites were out I went for the elites used bought unseen,the j was a dog 13lbs of dead spots.
The p was great but too polite,too elegant no metter how I played it.
I should try the deluxe again.

Anyway checked the only fender dealer in the country and they are selling the elites for 1500$ now,ultras gonna be in soon for 3000$ :)
 
Well, interestingly enough, they did install the wrong neck on mine.

I had the “Mocha Burst” finish with a maple fingerboard:

View attachment 3631698

After I returned it, Some folks started asking questions about why it had a maple fingerboard.

Fender’s website only shows rosewood as the neck option for that finish:

View attachment 3631701

The store got into contact with Fender and it turns out that it was a mistake. This was the only Mocha Burst that had a maple neck/fingerboard.

I like the look of that maple fingerboard, but that G string is barely on the fingerboard in both the maple and rosewood versions.
 
Last edited:
To be fair, it only takes a few seconds to get used to the G string being close to the edge Ala Stingray 5's. Once you "adjust" for it it becomes a non-issue.

Eh, maybe for some folks, but that’s exactly why I don’t play MusicMan 5s anymore.

Some manufacturers, like Sadowsky, actually test for g-string fingerboard slippage in their QA process. To me it just feels more like a design fault than a feature. Playing live, sometimes that extra bit of adrenaline that you’re not used to when practicing at home will cause you to fret just a tiny bit too hard and, whoops! There goes the string.
 

Latest posts