- Dec 25, 2002
- 9,737
- 310
- 49
- Disclosures
- Owner / Tech: Strange Guitarworks
This thread just begs the obvious question: Why should mainstream Black culture embrace Hendrix?
I'm not one to say that anybody should embrace Hendrix, but what confuses me is the seeming lack to embrace him at all, when it appears (to an outsider) that the black community idolizes many heroes as a point of pride. As a white man, I see the black community almost claiming certain figures that represented them. This is why I mentioned Tupac, Muhammad Ali, etc. - not because of their stances towards civil rights or whatever, but because how the are apparently... well, for a lack of better word, "owned" by the black community.
Now, only for the sake of illustration, I'd like to bring up a few other notable black figures: R Kelly, Michael Jackson, and OJ Simpson. None of these characters are what I would call shining examples of humanity, nor are they representative of the black community any more than Hendrix, but I have found that black attitudes towards these men are similar to the "ownership" that I expressed above. When these men got in trouble, it seemed to me that many in the black community came forward to offer their support, and in a sense to protect them. I heard dialog on the news and on the streets by black people saying stuff along the lines "they are one of us", "we protect our own", etc., etc. I may be putting it badly - forgive me if I don't sound eloquent, and try to see the point I'm making here.
Why isn't Hendrix "claimed" then? Tupac, Bob Marley, etc., are icons within the black community - so much so you see them on t-shirts of black men and women everywhere, especially the young. Where's all the Hendrix shirts? Why isn't Hendrix an icon to black people in this sense?
